Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Iran

1246789

Comments

  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,385
    one of the crew of the 'British' tanker is Russian .. get Putin to 'ave a word
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,719
    one of the crew of the 'British' tanker is Russian .. get Putin to 'ave a word
    Please don't 
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,658
    Chizz said:
    Addickted said:
    My point is the French do exactly what suits the French.

    Always have done.
    At the risk of further sidetracking this thread, whom should the French be trying to suit instead of the French?
    The French taking control of their sovereignty. The bastards.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,772
    A British ship with no British crew owned by a Swedish company. 
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,900
    Sounds like a Starbucks franchise. 
  • Ferryman
    Ferryman Posts: 2,922
    Dave2l said:
    Karim bagheri

    20mins at Ipswich.

    A million well spent.

    Now, close the thread 
    Reza....
  • addick05
    addick05 Posts: 2,348
    If you want to pursue a successful foreign policy you need to understand the history of a region - you ignore lessons of history at your peril. 

    If the best we can manage is a simple knee-jerk reaction then we won't get very far. Bolton in the US is desperate for war in the region and it would be easy to escalate things.
    Very true. One of the problems with countries like Iran - and Iraq - is that you are not dealing with one political group. These countries are 'governed' by disparate religious groups which really complicate matters. 
  • addick05
    addick05 Posts: 2,348
    Addickted said:
    I think you'll find the Grace 1 was travelling through EU waters illegally which gives EU member states the right to impound it.

    And of course we expected Iran to react, which is why the RN have seven warships in the region (Montrose, Ledbury. Blyth, Brocklesby, Shoreham and Cardigan Bay) as part of Operation Kipion and the new naval base in Bahrain (HMS Jufair), but even they cannot be everywhere within the Straits.
    This where the RAF (and USAF) come to the fore - hopefully.
  • Wheresmeticket
    Wheresmeticket Posts: 17,304
    edited July 2019
  • Addickted said:
    I think you'll find the Grace 1 was travelling through EU waters illegally which gives EU member states the right to impound it.

    And of course we expected Iran to react, which is why the RN have seven warships in the region (Montrose, Ledbury. Blyth, Brocklesby, Shoreham and Cardigan Bay) as part of Operation Kipion and the new naval base in Bahrain (HMS Jufair), but even they cannot be everywhere within the Straits.
    Gibraltar is not in the EU, neither is Morroco and I believe Spain has been critical of the seizure.  If we are going to interfere in affairs outside the UK, we need more justification than that given in our lapdog press. Plus retaliation has been on the cards for over a week. Where is our expensive navy and air force? If the ship's GPS was hacked, why wasn't it remotely monitored by Department of Defence and warned ? This is what you get with morons like Mourdant in positions of power.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,350
    Addickted said:
    I think you'll find the Grace 1 was travelling through EU waters illegally which gives EU member states the right to impound it.

    And of course we expected Iran to react, which is why the RN have seven warships in the region (Montrose, Ledbury. Blyth, Brocklesby, Shoreham and Cardigan Bay) as part of Operation Kipion and the new naval base in Bahrain (HMS Jufair), but even they cannot be everywhere within the Straits.
    Gibraltar is not in the EU, neither is Morroco and I believe Spain has been critical of the seizure.  If we are going to interfere in affairs outside the UK, we need more justification than that given in our lapdog press. Plus retaliation has been on the cards for over a week. Where is our expensive navy and air force? If the ship's GPS was hacked, why wasn't it remotely monitored by Department of Defence and warned ? This is what you get with morons like Mourdant in positions of power.
    Only to the same extent that Bromley isn't. 


  • If Gibraltar is not part of the eu why did they get the opportunity to vote in the referendum.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,282
    edited July 2019
    Chizz said:
    Addickted said:
    I think you'll find the Grace 1 was travelling through EU waters illegally which gives EU member states the right to impound it.

    And of course we expected Iran to react, which is why the RN have seven warships in the region (Montrose, Ledbury. Blyth, Brocklesby, Shoreham and Cardigan Bay) as part of Operation Kipion and the new naval base in Bahrain (HMS Jufair), but even they cannot be everywhere within the Straits.
    Gibraltar is not in the EU, neither is Morroco and I believe Spain has been critical of the seizure.  If we are going to interfere in affairs outside the UK, we need more justification than that given in our lapdog press. Plus retaliation has been on the cards for over a week. Where is our expensive navy and air force? If the ship's GPS was hacked, why wasn't it remotely monitored by Department of Defence and warned ? This is what you get with morons like Mourdant in positions of power.
    Only to the same extent that Bromley isn't. 




    Bromley isn't a British Overseas Territory, although I can imagine there would be some tax benefits if it was so let's make it happen.

    Gib voted in the 2016 referendum as it is a British Overseas Territory, and as such joined the EU (EEC as was) along with the United Kingdom in 1973. 
  • harveys_gardener
    harveys_gardener Posts: 7,038
    edited July 2019
    Gibraltar is considered a colony of the UK. It does not have a vote on the council and I believe it has only to follow it's jurisdiction on trade not EU laws. It is a very gray area, but to glibbly claim the ship was in EU waters needs examination. If it is a free borderless member of the EU, try telling that to the queues in and out of Spain every day.
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,125
    It's in the EU, therefore its waters are very much EU waters.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_member_state_territories_and_the_European_Union
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,282
    Gibraltar is considered a colony of the UK. It does not have a vote on the council and I believe it has only to follow it's jurisdiction on trade not EU laws. It is a very gray area, but to glibbly claim the ship was in EU waters needs examination. If it is a free borderless member of the EU, try telling that to the queues in and out of Spain every day.
    I don't know if you have noticed but the UK has controlled borders with other most EU States and is , at least for now, a member of the EU.

    Running oil to a fellow murderous and oppressive Syrian regime is the issue not some fantasy excuse about Gib not being in the EU but as ever the Corbyn cult takes the side of any regime or terror group, no matter how vile, just as long as they are anti-USA. 
  • harveys_gardener
    harveys_gardener Posts: 7,038
    edited July 2019
    On what basis is Iran a terrorist state? They were invaded by Iraq with UK/US support. That turned out to be a successful partnership didn't it? When did Syria last invade another country?  We are up to our armpits in that nation's troubles as well. In my lifetime we have been  in over directly involved a dozen wars against smaller countries, implicated involvement in many more, none of which threatened our coastline, does that not make us s Terrorist State. I fucking hate bullies.
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    I fucking hate bullies.
    What, like Bashar al-Assad?


  • harveys_gardener
    harveys_gardener Posts: 7,038
    edited July 2019
    Gibraltar is considered a colony of the UK. It does not have a vote on the council and I believe it has only to follow it's jurisdiction on trade not EU laws. It is a very gray area, but to glibbly claim the ship was in EU waters needs examination. If it is a free borderless member of the EU, try telling that to the queues in and out of Spain every day.
    I don't know if you have noticed but the UK has controlled borders with other most EU States and is , at least for now, a member of the EU.

    Running oil to a fellow murderous and oppressive Syrian regime is the issue not some fantasy excuse about Gib not being in the EU but as ever the Corbyn cult takes the side of any regime or terror group, no matter how vile, just as long as they are anti-USA. 
    But it is OK to cosy up to murderous oppressive regimes like Saudi, Israel, previously Iraq, Turkey, Libya, Bahrain.

    Our supposed greatest ally had its president with a s smug smile, while his supporters chanted send her back, about a Somali born US citizen. But I agree it is all Corbyn s fault.
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    So they're only nasty oppressive regimes if you say they are.

    Like Gibraltar not being part of the EU.

    Weird.

  • Sponsored links:



  • harveys_gardener
    harveys_gardener Posts: 7,038
    edited July 2019
    Addicted you need to finesse your post.  I have explained the grey areas of Gibraltar being "part of the EU" such as they  don't have a vote on the council. Put up or shut up.  Please justify why you think the regimes I've mentioned are not murderous.

    If you can't manage more than knee jerk comments, don't bother posting.
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    edited July 2019
     Put up or shut up. 


    The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, which entered into force in 1995, set a new standard of 12 nautical miles.

    Most countries, including the members of the European Union, are signatories to the Convention. It applies to Gibraltar.

    Under the Convention Gibraltar generates its own "Territorial Sea" of 12 nautical miles, or out to median lines where other states coastlines are under 24 nautical miles distant from Gibraltar.


  • Addickted said:
     Put up or shut up. 


    The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, which entered into force in 1995, set a new standard of 12 nautical miles.

    Most countries, including the members of the European Union, are signatories to the Convention. It applies to Gibraltar.

    Under the Convention Gibraltar generates its own "Territorial Sea" of 12 nautical miles, or out to median lines where other states coastlines are under 24 nautical miles distant from Gibraltar.


    Game set and match 

    now bomb the bstds 
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    As regards murderous regimes, we seem to have thousands of both Iranians and Syrians desperately trying to get into this country as asylum seekers - even illegally.

    Certainly cannot think of any small boats crossing the channel filled with Saudi, Turkish or Israeli refugees fleeing oppression in their Countries.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,350
    Addickted said:
     Put up or shut up. 


    The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, which entered into force in 1995, set a new standard of 12 nautical miles.

    Most countries, including the members of the European Union, are signatories to the Convention. It applies to Gibraltar.

    Under the Convention Gibraltar generates its own "Territorial Sea" of 12 nautical miles, or out to median lines where other states coastlines are under 24 nautical miles distant from Gibraltar.


    Game set and match 

    now bomb the bstds 
    Just before we issue the final instructions, can you confirm which country's bastards are to be bombed?  And where - roughly - are these bastards?  

    And, although it's nit-picking somewhat, are you at all bothered as to whether any of our bastards get caught up in the bombing? 
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,501
    Chizz said:
    Addickted said:
     Put up or shut up. 


    The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, which entered into force in 1995, set a new standard of 12 nautical miles.

    Most countries, including the members of the European Union, are signatories to the Convention. It applies to Gibraltar.

    Under the Convention Gibraltar generates its own "Territorial Sea" of 12 nautical miles, or out to median lines where other states coastlines are under 24 nautical miles distant from Gibraltar.


    Game set and match 

    now bomb the bstds 
    Just before we issue the final instructions, can you confirm which country's bastards are to be bombed?  And where - roughly - are these bastards?  

    And, although it's nit-picking somewhat, are you at all bothered as to whether any of our bastards get caught up in the bombing? 
    How would they get caught up in the bombing......no land troops would be involved?
  • Chizz said:
    Addickted said:
     Put up or shut up. 


    The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, which entered into force in 1995, set a new standard of 12 nautical miles.

    Most countries, including the members of the European Union, are signatories to the Convention. It applies to Gibraltar.

    Under the Convention Gibraltar generates its own "Territorial Sea" of 12 nautical miles, or out to median lines where other states coastlines are under 24 nautical miles distant from Gibraltar.


    Game set and match 

    now bomb the bstds 
    Just before we issue the final instructions, can you confirm which country's bastards are to be bombed?  And where - roughly - are these bastards?  

    And, although it's nit-picking somewhat, are you at all bothered as to whether any of our bastards get caught up in the bombing? 
    We don’t have bstds only god loving queen adoring men and women now bomb the bstds 
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,350
    Chizz said:
    Addickted said:
     Put up or shut up. 


    The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, which entered into force in 1995, set a new standard of 12 nautical miles.

    Most countries, including the members of the European Union, are signatories to the Convention. It applies to Gibraltar.

    Under the Convention Gibraltar generates its own "Territorial Sea" of 12 nautical miles, or out to median lines where other states coastlines are under 24 nautical miles distant from Gibraltar.


    Game set and match 

    now bomb the bstds 
    Just before we issue the final instructions, can you confirm which country's bastards are to be bombed?  And where - roughly - are these bastards?  

    And, although it's nit-picking somewhat, are you at all bothered as to whether any of our bastards get caught up in the bombing? 
    How would they get caught up in the bombing......no land troops would be involved?
    Well, if we are bombing people who have taken possession of one of "our" ships, it's likely that the sailors from that ship might be in the vicinity.  No? 
  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172
    edited July 2019
    “Round em up, put em in a field and bomb the bastards”
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,772
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Addickted said:
     Put up or shut up. 


    The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, which entered into force in 1995, set a new standard of 12 nautical miles.

    Most countries, including the members of the European Union, are signatories to the Convention. It applies to Gibraltar.

    Under the Convention Gibraltar generates its own "Territorial Sea" of 12 nautical miles, or out to median lines where other states coastlines are under 24 nautical miles distant from Gibraltar.


    Game set and match 

    now bomb the bstds 
    Just before we issue the final instructions, can you confirm which country's bastards are to be bombed?  And where - roughly - are these bastards?  

    And, although it's nit-picking somewhat, are you at all bothered as to whether any of our bastards get caught up in the bombing? 
    How would they get caught up in the bombing......no land troops would be involved?
    Well, if we are bombing people who have taken possession of one of "our" ships, it's likely that the sailors from that ship might be in the vicinity.  No? 
    It's ok they are foreign