Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

No Vaccination Novak Djokovic

12931333435

Comments

  • bigstemarra
    bigstemarra Posts: 5,098
    Homeopathy; I like to think of it as a tax on morons.

    It's clear that Novak has fully signed up for this bullshit -  someone should try and sell him a bridge, it could be profitable....
  • EugenesAxe
    EugenesAxe Posts: 3,283
    edited January 2022
  • TEL
    TEL Posts: 10,100
    Said to be looking to sue the Australian government for $6million.

    He needs to get over himself.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,331
    TEL said:
    Said to be looking to sue the Australian government for $6million.

    He needs to get over himself.
    They should agree to pay him.  And tell him they'll leave it, in cash, in a bank in Sydney.  He can come and get it whenever he wants...
  • JamesSeed
    JamesSeed Posts: 17,380
    Agh, can’t believe I missed that. 👍
  • TEL
    TEL Posts: 10,100
    Chizz said:
    TEL said:
    Said to be looking to sue the Australian government for $6million.

    He needs to get over himself.
    They should agree to pay him.  And tell him they'll leave it, in cash, in a bank in Sydney.  He can come and get it whenever he wants...
    Morrison said he had left the door open for him to return....seems the automatic three year ban isnt being implemented.
  • red10
    red10 Posts: 833

  • arny23394
    arny23394 Posts: 1,180
    red10 said:

    That’s a good one - shame it’s already been posted 380 times on this thread.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,484
    TEL said:
    Chizz said:
    TEL said:
    Said to be looking to sue the Australian government for $6million.

    He needs to get over himself.
    They should agree to pay him.  And tell him they'll leave it, in cash, in a bank in Sydney.  He can come and get it whenever he wants...
    Morrison said he had left the door open for him to return....seems the automatic three year ban isnt being implemented.
    The balls in Djokovic's court
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,759
    edited January 2022
    BBC research has cast doubt on the timing of the positive Covid test Novak Djokovic used to enter Australia to try to compete in the Australian Open.

     Documents submitted by his lawyers to federal court in Australia included two Covid (PCR) test certificates, one with a positive result on 16 December and one with a negative result on 22 December.

     However, the serial number on his positive test appears out of sequence with a sample of tests from Serbia over the same period gathered by the BBC. It is also higher than for his second (negative) test result from six days later.



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhvDu94wrDU
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,989
    edited January 2022
    Yes, it would appear that allegedly it was some kind of fake positive result.
    Although of course the BBC and others won't want to say that for fear of being sued.
  • Yes, it has seemed for a while, this is the case. Probably why he went out when  'positive' because he wasn't, just lied and cheated to get in
  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265
    edited January 2022
    He will get some negative reactions when he turns up at Wimbledon, he may even be tut-tutted, and have the occasional Strawberry hurled in his general direction.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,143
    Well, ahead of my summit post -Jan beers with my Serbian mate, I am appreciative of Scott Morrison firing the vax shot across Kayne West’s bows. That will at least take the sting out of his Serbia-as-victim narrative.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,728
    If it is proven he has done this, surely the tennis authorities should take action.
  • If it is proven he has done this, surely the tennis authorities should take action.
    Agreed. In some ways it feels even more criminal than if he had gone out after actually testing positive
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,779
    I see Novax has started the PR offensive with an interview with the Beeb.
    Claiming his stance is all about freedom of choice.
    Says he’d sacrifice the French Open and Wimbledon to make his stand.  
    Distanced himself from anti-vax groups.
    Expressed disappointment in his ‘colleagues’ at the Oz open. Whatever that means.
    Obviously, no questions were asked about his dubious “positive test” in December, or about his twatting about at functions without a mask after the fact, but there you go.

    Call me an old cynic, but the guy just seems like a liar who came unstuck because he thought he was untouchable. Now he’s been wheeled out by his advisors to start reparation.

    The guys a twat. Fuck him.
  • cafcnick1992
    cafcnick1992 Posts: 7,413
    edited February 2022
    Why wouldn't be play at Wimbledon? There's no vaccination requirement to enter England?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 11,983
    I have to say, I agree with his point about pro choice not anti-vax.
    Why can’t we live in a society where you either make the choice to have it, as I have. 
    Or you don’t, and that’s fine.
    There’s so much anger about. 
    While the likes of Boris J piss about with our country, the worker bees fight it out amongst themselves. 
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,779
    edited February 2022
    Valley11 said:
    I have to say, I agree with his point about pro choice not anti-vax.
    Why can’t we live in a society where you either make the choice to have it, as I have. 
    Or you don’t, and that’s fine.
    There’s so much anger about. 
    While the likes of Boris J piss about with our country, the worker bees fight it out amongst themselves. 
    Well, you could argue that, but you could also argue that being vaccinated helps those around you as well, so it’s not just about one person’s choice.
    Regardless, that’s not the point. The point is he’s wriggling out of a PR disaster of his own making that was exacerbated by (allegedly) lies, corruption and an attitude of entitlement.
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842
    He thinks he is essential to the tournaments but I wonder. He will soon be forgotten once the tournaments start.

    He's arguably the greatest ever player and tournaments are the lesser if he is not there.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,033
    I see Novax has started the PR offensive with an interview with the Beeb.
    Claiming his stance is all about freedom of choice.
    Says he’d sacrifice the French Open and Wimbledon to make his stand.  
    Distanced himself from anti-vax groups.
    Expressed disappointment in his ‘colleagues’ at the Oz open. Whatever that means.
    Obviously, no questions were asked about his dubious “positive test” in December, or about his twatting about at functions without a mask after the fact, but there you go.

    Call me an old cynic, but the guy just seems like a liar who came unstuck because he thought he was untouchable. Now he’s been wheeled out by his advisors to start reparation.

    The guys a twat. Fuck him.
    He didn’t really make a stand for his beliefs in Australia, he lied (seemingly multiple times) and got kicked out of the country. 
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842
    Valley11 said:
    I have to say, I agree with his point about pro choice not anti-vax.
    Why can’t we live in a society where you either make the choice to have it, as I have. 
    Or you don’t, and that’s fine.
    There’s so much anger about. 
    While the likes of Boris J piss about with our country, the worker bees fight it out amongst themselves. 

    I don't think many people disagree with free choice and he is absolutely within his rights not to take the vaccine. He just has to accept the consequences of that choice.

    If he had come out prior to the Aussie Open and said something like "I respect the sovereign rights of Australia to impose entry limitations and as I have for the time being decided against taking the vaccine then I will regrettably withdraw from this year's tournament" then I believe that would have been reasonable and accepted. He didn't - it appears he opted to cheat the system.
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    Nice bit of PR for Novak set up by a huge PR firm with the BBC. 

    Allowed to air his views without much debate to millions of people in the UK. So much for being cancelled.
  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265
    edited February 2022
    bobmunro said:
    He thinks he is essential to the tournaments but I wonder. He will soon be forgotten once the tournaments start.

    He's arguably the greatest ever player and tournaments are the lesser if he is not there.
    nah! who would miss a no personalty droid like him, he's 34 there will be a new one round the corner any time soon.

  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,143
    Amol Rajan seems to divide opinion. I’m on the side that considers him to be an over-rated narcissist who should have pissed off to GB News with Andrew Neil. There’s no way Novax’s people were going to let someone like Emily Maitlis or even Neil himself, on him, as for starters they would have point blank refused any advance discussion on the interview topics.
  • I see Novax has started the PR offensive with an interview with the Beeb.
    Claiming his stance is all about freedom of choice.
    Says he’d sacrifice the French Open and Wimbledon to make his stand.  
    Distanced himself from anti-vax groups.
    Expressed disappointment in his ‘colleagues’ at the Oz open. Whatever that means.
    Obviously, no questions were asked about his dubious “positive test” in December, or about his twatting about at functions without a mask after the fact, but there you go.

    Call me an old cynic, but the guy just seems like a liar who came unstuck because he thought he was untouchable. Now he’s been wheeled out by his advisors to start reparation.

    The guys a twat. Fuck him.
    I agree with your conclusion. 
  • He was booted out of Australia because he lied on his visa application This is a felony that the home office acts up to They say why wasn't he refused entry in the fist place ,and not make it look like they changed the rules when he was in flight. which is a good question to ask Craig Tiley (Tennis Australia) and the Victorian government in Melbourne, So we can assume it was the dollars involved- The contentious issue, of  does a previous infection of Covid 19 within 6 months Professor Sutton (virologist) in Victoria, said yes. while the N S W health minister said no. It's so confusing. But N J, lied any way. I think N J will look back on his decision with great regret Probably the best tennis player ever