Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Barnsley threatening EFL ahead of Disciplinary action for Wednesday, Derby & Birmingham

1252628303140

Comments

  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Can we name who owns us and have they given the EFL what they require in the last 7 months 
    I'm worried that the EFL will find a way to dock us points because we can't find anyone since January who can prove source and sufficiency of funding. If we can't provide that going forward I'd say there is a chance they won't let us compete next season.
    The 1st part can't happen, the second looks increasing likley. 
    Pardon my ignorance of the EFL rules (assuming they’re not made up as the season goes along - cos that’s what it feels like) but if we are not allowed to compete next season what happens to us? Do we drop out of the leagues completely and have to work our way back in or do we automatically drop to League Two? 😳
  • Markg2004 said:
    siblers said:
    Even if Wednesday were deducted, I'd really fear for us next season in the championship with the owner situation, obviously being in the Championship will make the club more attractive to buyers but trying to get in players for the start of the season would be very difficult
    More attractive to crooks i would also believe. 

    PV and AB have said League One doesn't affect them. They just need to know who owns CAFC from the EFL.
    Good luck with that....and if they do watch out for the abuse of ungrateful CARD holders who wanted Roland out that led to this...and the revenge is not over yet. With Covid , who will by into football ?
    Not this again .....
  • Wigan can't win their appeal and won't. It does genuinely sadden me to say that, but administration has a penalty everybody understands and it needs to remain so. I feel a brotherhood with them as we are both clubs fcuked up by cnuts.
    Also read that they will be limited to a playing squad of 20 next season and have a 2 year transfer ban.

    Assume that means banned from paying a fee though, as they'd have to be allowed loans and free transfers.
    Is that 20 senior pros as that's the size of most L1 squads anyway?
  • Wigan can't win their appeal and won't. It does genuinely sadden me to say that, but administration has a penalty everybody understands and it needs to remain so. I feel a brotherhood with them as we are both clubs fcuked up by cnuts.
    Also read that they will be limited to a playing squad of 20 next season and have a 2 year transfer ban.

    Assume that means banned from paying a fee though, as they'd have to be allowed loans and free transfers.
    Why is that? - Never known the two year transfer ban to be part of the Administration punishment?
  • Wigan can't win their appeal and won't. It does genuinely sadden me to say that, but administration has a penalty everybody understands and it needs to remain so. I feel a brotherhood with them as we are both clubs fcuked up by cnuts.
    Also read that they will be limited to a playing squad of 20 next season and have a 2 year transfer ban.

    Assume that means banned from paying a fee though, as they'd have to be allowed loans and free transfers.
    Why is that? - Never known the two year transfer ban to be part of the Administration punishment?
    Not sure, i was surprised by it too but it's what their administrator said.

    2 year ban which remains even if they win the points appeal. Bizarre.
  • Wigan can't win their appeal and won't. It does genuinely sadden me to say that, but administration has a penalty everybody understands and it needs to remain so. I feel a brotherhood with them as we are both clubs fcuked up by cnuts.
    Also read that they will be limited to a playing squad of 20 next season and have a 2 year transfer ban.

    Assume that means banned from paying a fee though, as they'd have to be allowed loans and free transfers.
    Why is that? - Never known the two year transfer ban to be part of the Administration punishment?
    Not sure, i was surprised by it too but it's what their administrator said.

    2 year ban which remains even if they win the points appeal. Bizarre.
    Guess its a further rule that stops clubs from using it as an excuse just to wipe clear some debt
  • edited July 2020
    Wigan can't win their appeal and won't. It does genuinely sadden me to say that, but administration has a penalty everybody understands and it needs to remain so. I feel a brotherhood with them as we are both clubs fcuked up by cnuts.
    Also read that they will be limited to a playing squad of 20 next season and have a 2 year transfer ban.

    Assume that means banned from paying a fee though, as they'd have to be allowed loans and free transfers.
    Why is that? - Never known the two year transfer ban to be part of the Administration punishment?
    Not sure, i was surprised by it too but it's what their administrator said.

    2 year ban which remains even if they win the points appeal. Bizarre.
    Guess its a further rule that stops clubs from using it as an excuse just to wipe clear some debt


    Also I don't think it's in the rules as part of a punishment so not sure why it's been applied
  • It's surely punishing a club twice for the same thing though.

    I assume they'll be able to sign free transfers and loans though as otherwise they won't have a squad. Pretty sure it just means they can't sign players for a transfer fee, but not many clubs in league one pay fees for players these days anyway.
  • Sponsored links:


  • It's surely punishing a club twice for the same thing though.

    I assume they'll be able to sign free transfers and loans though as otherwise they won't have a squad. Pretty sure it just means they can't sign players for a transfer fee, but not many clubs in league one pay fees for players these days anyway.
    Not to mention the free transfer market is surely going to have plenty of gems in it this summer!!
  • It's surely punishing a club twice for the same thing though.

    I assume they'll be able to sign free transfers and loans though as otherwise they won't have a squad. Pretty sure it just means they can't sign players for a transfer fee, but not many clubs in league one pay fees for players these days anyway.
    But if you've gone into administration because you're "broke" it doesn't look very good if you immediately start splashing the cash as soon as you have your debts written off.

    Imagine that you're a business that's just lost thousands of pounds because a football club has only settled up, at best, a few pence in the pound after going into administration. How would you feel if, a couple of months later, that same football club goes out and spends hundreds of thousands on a new player whilst you're struggling to survive?
  • edited July 2020
    Just can't see it being applied this season. Especially if they can appeal, it will just create a headache for the EFL, I think it will be next season that they will get the deduction
  • We're going to be reinstated aren't we? PV and AB takeover, buy the ground and we'll be challenging for Europe within 3 years! 
    Nah!!
  • siblers said:
    Just can't see it being applied this season. Especially if they can appeal, it will just create a headache for the EFL, I think it will be next season that they will get the deduction

    Ok they stay in the Championship for now. If after their appeal they are still found guilty then it's a two division relegation and no further appeals.
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited July 2020
    If both get a points deduction for next season, it makes relegation all the worse as we'd have had an immediate head start on them

    Ifs and buts and all that but still :(
  • The EFL are not fit for perpose, they signed it off, they even sent an email to the club that we could 'go ahead' with the transfer of the sale yet after a few objections from Barnsley and Middlesboro they started to have a 're-think'

    The Wigan fiasco shows what state the game is in, its a joke.

    Comiserations on your relegation that must have been a bitter pill to swallow that and I'm sure you will be back soon.
    Did the Football League also sign off recording the sale in an earlier financial year than when the transaction took place?
    Beat me to it. Any response to this from a Wednesday fan? Seems pretty cut and dry to me.
  • The EFL are not fit for perpose, they signed it off, they even sent an email to the club that we could 'go ahead' with the transfer of the sale yet after a few objections from Barnsley and Middlesboro they started to have a 're-think'

    That is an extreme over simplification of events. It sounds like a criminal act to me (pushing a sale into a previous accounting year). But, not to worry the EFL are dragging their heels from last November, and will move the punishment into next season.
  • The EFL are not fit for perpose, they signed it off, they even sent an email to the club that we could 'go ahead' with the transfer of the sale yet after a few objections from Barnsley and Middlesboro they started to have a 're-think'

    The Wigan fiasco shows what state the game is in, its a joke.

    Comiserations on your relegation that must have been a bitter pill to swallow that and I'm sure you will be back soon.
    Did the Football League also sign off recording the sale in an earlier financial year than when the transaction took place?
    Do you know exactly when the transaction took place ? 

    If the club has had the sale, date, times, colour of paint on doors approved and an email confirming it what more can the club do? 

    Whilst I do not like our current owner one bit if he has provided everything that was asked and an email back rubber stamping it - and then the EFL has had another re think due to objections from outside parties then sorry the blame lies with the inept lot that talks about betting scandals with fans on the street.
  • Just checking but if we lose players to relegation release clauses and the EFL then apply a deduction to Wednesday - Do our departed players have to return?
  • edited July 2020
    The EFL are not fit for perpose, they signed it off, they even sent an email to the club that we could 'go ahead' with the transfer of the sale yet after a few objections from Barnsley and Middlesboro they started to have a 're-think'

    The Wigan fiasco shows what state the game is in, its a joke.

    Comiserations on your relegation that must have been a bitter pill to swallow that and I'm sure you will be back soon.
    Did the Football League also sign off recording the sale in an earlier financial year than when the transaction took place?
    Do you know exactly when the transaction took place ? 

    If the club has had the sale, date, times, colour of paint on doors approved and an email confirming it what more can the club do? 

    Whilst I do not like our current owner one bit if he has provided everything that was asked and an email back rubber stamping it - and then the EFL has had another re think due to objections from outside parties then sorry the blame lies with the inept lot that talks about betting scandals with fans on the street.
    According to SWFC accounts it took place before the company that purchased it even existed.

    Remind us, who provided the valuation for Hillsborough as well?

    Have you seen this email that 'rubber stamped' the deal? Was it a formal approval of a sale of the stadium backdated to a previous years accounts from someone high up on EFL Governance? Or was it from Sid in accounts?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!