Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .3
-
Maybe the reality is that Cawley just doesn't have any clout in the industry.0
-
UnfairBedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .
Cawley has provided masses of useful information and analysis.
He's clearly on our side, but at the end of the day he's a news reporter, and has to report the story. He's not writing a blog or fanzine where it's obvious you're getting a partisan view45 -
It probably is unfair but it’s the feeling I get from him .killerandflash said:
UnfairBedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .
Cawley has provided masses of useful information and analysis.
He's clearly on our side, but at the end of the day he's a news reporter, and has to report the story. He's not writing a blog or fanzine where it's obvious you're getting a partisan view0 -
Sorry but you are totally out of order.Bedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .
This is disrespectful bollocks and you should retract it.18 -
I reckon that’s bollocks and yes, out of order unless you can back it up with something other than “a feeling”.Bedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .0 -
erm no . It's my opinion and i stick by it sweetheart .Covered End said:
Sorry but that is disrespectful bollocks and you should retract it.Bedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .3 -
And it's not funny either.Covered End said:
Sorry but you are totally out of order.Bedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .
This is disrespectful bollocks and you should retract it.4 -
The only reason that it appears Cawley likes seeing us suffer is because the basket case of an ownership we have gives him so much material to work with. I'm sure he'll be as delighted as anyone when it's ove2
-
It a feeling not a fact . How do you back up a feeling?? Wow. so feelings and opinions are not allowed now on CL ? If you disagree fine , just say why but i'm not having people tell me to retract a post or back it up. Bollocks to you.cafcfan1990 said:
I reckon that’s bollocks and yes, out of order unless you can back it up with something other than “a feeling”.Bedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .3 -
Sponsored links:
-
He's a journo, he gets a story he runs it.
If he didn't I'd have a massive amount of disrespect for him, it's his job, there's already far too many high profile journalists and news outlets that act as opinion pieces rather than news pieces.4 -
Feelings are easy to back up, there must be something that’s made you form that opinion or feeling? You even said it may be unfair but now just getting all defensive.Bedsaddick said:
It a feeling not a fact . How do you back up a feeling?? Wow. so feelings and opinions are not allowed now on CL ? If you disagree fine , just say why but i'm not having people tell me to retract a post or back it up. Bollocks to you.cafcfan1990 said:
I reckon that’s bollocks and yes, out of order unless you can back it up with something other than “a feeling”.Bedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .
Dont think anyone has said you can’t have an opinion, but it your going to publicly criticise someone it’s not fair to have anything at all to back it up,2 -
Makes no sense what you saying and not even relevant. Always one or on here quite a few ones. SlowBedsaddick said:
erm no . It's my opinion and i stick by it sweetheart .Covered End said:
Sorry but that is disrespectful bollocks and you should retract it.Bedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .2 -
Hate to add to the burgeoning overflow of posts but Richard Cawley is not the problem. He has already said SLP will happily print any reply from either an official source or a fan-driven source.
The letter from PE is full of holes. A non-threatening response could easily be drafted that responds to his points and mentions the inconsistency between his assertions in the letter and those made in court by either ESI 2 or their barrister.
if we get that published we can all use our non-bogus twitter accounts to like and retweet it.8 -
Apologies readers.
It's one of my personality traits, not suffering fools gladly or perhaps foolish comments.3 -
MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.
0 -
Quite right.killerandflash said:
UnfairBedsaddick said:I might be out of order saying this but I have a feeling Cawley enjoys seeing us suffer .
Cawley has provided masses of useful information and analysis.
He's clearly on our side, but at the end of the day he's a news reporter, and has to report the story. He's not writing a blog or fanzine where it's obvious you're getting a partisan view1 -
it did cross my mind though, that could one group who had failed the EFL test be critical of another who had done the same ?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.0 -
Lauren doesn't seem overly bothered
19 -
That concerned me. I’ve no basis on this, purely my thoughts, but MM cocking up like that could of seriously dented our case. Are we sure he’s on ‘our’ side?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Or she's doing the smart thing and keeping schtum until required.carly burn said:Lauren doesn't seem overly bothered7 -
Not ours, but Nimer's and for me that says he wants PM to win so TN gets a payday from TS.ozaddick said:
That concerned me. I’ve no basis on this, purely my thoughts, but MM cocking up like that could of seriously dented our case. Are we sure he’s on ‘our’ side?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.0 -
Ok thanks mate.Dazzler21 said:
Not ours, but Nimer's and for me that says he wants PM to win so TN gets a payday from TS.ozaddick said:
That concerned me. I’ve no basis on this, purely my thoughts, but MM cocking up like that could of seriously dented our case. Are we sure he’s on ‘our’ side?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.0 -
On Tuesday Lauren had her 'professional' head on.Dazzler21 said:
Or she's doing the smart thing and keeping schtum until required.carly burn said:Lauren doesn't seem overly bothered
Today she's wearing her 'fan' head.1 -
To be honest, if this is their master plan to win the appeal it is pretty pathetic.5
-
Who's PM?Dazzler21 said:
Not ours, but Nimer's and for me that says he wants PM to win so TN gets a payday from TS.ozaddick said:
That concerned me. I’ve no basis on this, purely my thoughts, but MM cocking up like that could of seriously dented our case. Are we sure he’s on ‘our’ side?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.0 -
Panorama Magiccarly burn said:
Who's PM?Dazzler21 said:
Not ours, but Nimer's and for me that says he wants PM to win so TN gets a payday from TS.ozaddick said:
That concerned me. I’ve no basis on this, purely my thoughts, but MM cocking up like that could of seriously dented our case. Are we sure he’s on ‘our’ side?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.1 -
Panamera I guessed.carly burn said:
Who's PM?Dazzler21 said:
Not ours, but Nimer's and for me that says he wants PM to win so TN gets a payday from TS.ozaddick said:
That concerned me. I’ve no basis on this, purely my thoughts, but MM cocking up like that could of seriously dented our case. Are we sure he’s on ‘our’ side?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.0 -
I'm 99.99% sure he doesn't support Elliott. His mistake nearly cost us, but I think we can be sure it was just incompetence rather than a deliberate ploy.ozaddick said:
That concerned me. I’ve no basis on this, purely my thoughts, but MM cocking up like that could of seriously dented our case. Are we sure he’s on ‘our’ side?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.4 -
Boriscarly burn said:
Who's PM?Dazzler21 said:
Not ours, but Nimer's and for me that says he wants PM to win so TN gets a payday from TS.ozaddick said:
That concerned me. I’ve no basis on this, purely my thoughts, but MM cocking up like that could of seriously dented our case. Are we sure he’s on ‘our’ side?mendonca said:MM messing up the details about the Oadt test meant that it was an area that we could not expose in the trial.
There were so many holes in that area which we could not pursue with questioning. So much so that better questions have been posed on the board.33
This discussion has been closed.
