Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Matt Smith MK2 (the Arsenal loanee one) - gone to Wigan p7

24567

Comments

  • Champs85
    Champs85 Posts: 254
    Swindon fans love him. A lot of Motm performances. 


    Seems we’ve done a bit of a Swansea last season with Gallagher. I’m happy with this! Him and jfc in central midfield, Kirk and millar as wingers, thats a strong midfield 
  • Being a arsenal youth team player, I expect he has plenty enough ability on the ball. I just don't see how he will be better then Shinnie, or JFC on current form - I'd even be interested to see what is he bringing to the side that Morgan does not have?

    Unless Bowyer is going to play him in the Pratley or Watson role which I dont see happening.

  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,195
    Hopefully he’ll be more Coquelin than Frimpong. 
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,167
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    He was told to man mark and did it well. Pratley is frustrating and has a lot of failings, but credit should always be given where due. 

  • Champs85
    Champs85 Posts: 254
    He can tackle and pass. I’d like to think in a 442 he’s replacing the pratley/Watson role who aren’t mobile enough (yes I know pratley contained Fraser but he is not mobile enough) 
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,218
    edited February 2021
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    25 games in to this season and that’s the first time we’ve built a player around fully man-marking another. It ended with us winning the game 1-0. No idea why sarcasm is needed a week later. Just enjoy the win and the fact Pratley did a certain kind of job well for ONE specific game. 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
    All this talk of binning off Maddison has aroused my ire
  • Sponsored links:



  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
    All this talk of binning off Maddison has aroused my ire
    IF we see Maddison go it'll add to the argument that Bowyer can only manage easy to manage players and that he can only use already decent players and doesn't in fact make any players better, he just bins the ones that don't play well for a spell. 
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    Dazzler21 said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
    All this talk of binning off Maddison has aroused my ire
    IF we see Maddison go it'll add to the argument that Bowyer can only manage easy to manage players and that he can only use already decent players and doesn't in fact make any players better, he just bins the ones that don't play well for a spell. 
    Nonsense
  • Champs85 said:
    He can tackle and pass. I’d like to think in a 442 he’s replacing the pratley/Watson role who aren’t mobile enough (yes I know pratley contained Fraser but he is not mobile enough) 
    Can he?

    He's a passing midfielder, so I'd be amazed if a 20 year old could also be a solid defensive player as well
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    edited February 2021
    Rothko said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
    All this talk of binning off Maddison has aroused my ire
    IF we see Maddison go it'll add to the argument that Bowyer can only manage easy to manage players and that he can only use already decent players and doesn't in fact make any players better, he just bins the ones that don't play well for a spell. 
    Nonsense
    Don't see how it is, what hard to manage players has he had?

    What players have genuinely improved under Bowyer? A few have gone backwards. 

    I'm not calling for the guys head, just calling out his BS on how he always improves players. We've seen it is not true. We've also seen him fail a few times to manage players that could be seen as more difficult. 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314
    Albie Morgan's got better at kicking people 
  • Dave Rudd
    Dave Rudd Posts: 2,865
    I haven't done the groundwork yet (for which I apologise), but the arrival of Matt Smith forms the basis for a nice quiz question:

    Apart from the obvious 1947 team, which Charlton players (past and present) have an FA Cup Winners medal?
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    Dazzler21 said:
    Rothko said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
    All this talk of binning off Maddison has aroused my ire
    IF we see Maddison go it'll add to the argument that Bowyer can only manage easy to manage players and that he can only use already decent players and doesn't in fact make any players better, he just bins the ones that don't play well for a spell. 
    Nonsense
    Don't see how it is, what hard to manage players has he had?

    What players have genuinely improved under Bowyer? A few have gone backwards. 

    Taylor didn’t exactly smack me as easy for example, I don’t know the personalities of individual players. 

    As for improvement. Well Taylor, Grant, Gallagher, Doughty, Belik, Cullen, Aribo etc etc 
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,484
    I've a hunch Smith will play quite a lot once he's settled here. Of all the loanees I'd probably rather Maatsen wasn't involved as Purrington can do a job. Though all six being fit is another matter. 
  • Dave Rudd said:
    I haven't done the groundwork yet (for which I apologise), but the arrival of Matt Smith forms the basis for a nice quiz question:

    Apart from the obvious 1947 team, which Charlton players (past and present) have an FA Cup Winners medal?
    From the current team; Ben Watson
  • Sponsored links:



  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Rothko said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
    All this talk of binning off Maddison has aroused my ire
    IF we see Maddison go it'll add to the argument that Bowyer can only manage easy to manage players and that he can only use already decent players and doesn't in fact make any players better, he just bins the ones that don't play well for a spell. 
    Nonsense
    It's only as much nonsense that we improve everyone that walks through door is. 
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,824
    Rothko said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Rothko said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
    All this talk of binning off Maddison has aroused my ire
    IF we see Maddison go it'll add to the argument that Bowyer can only manage easy to manage players and that he can only use already decent players and doesn't in fact make any players better, he just bins the ones that don't play well for a spell. 
    Nonsense
    Don't see how it is, what hard to manage players has he had?

    What players have genuinely improved under Bowyer? A few have gone backwards. 

    Taylor didn’t exactly smack me as easy for example, I don’t know the personalities of individual players. 

    As for improvement. Well Taylor, Grant, Gallagher, Doughty, Belik, Cullen, Aribo etc etc 
    Phillips, Dijksteel, Sarr, Cullen, Aribo, Bielik, Morgan, Doughty, Grant, Taylor, Gallagher, Innis, Famewo.  It's a long list.  
  • Valiantphil
    Valiantphil Posts: 6,410
    The Arsenal Reconnection Does In Swindon

    Who ?
     
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Dave Rudd said:
    I haven't done the groundwork yet (for which I apologise), but the arrival of Matt Smith forms the basis for a nice quiz question:

    Apart from the obvious 1947 team, which Charlton players (past and present) have an FA Cup Winners medal?
    Smith, Barnes, Blomquist, Crooks, Maxie Miller, Watson, Pates, Jeffers, Murphy? 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    edited February 2021
    Rothko said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Rothko said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Leuth said:
    Leuth said:
    But the opposition will have a good player so we'll have to play Pratley instead to man-mark him and get rave reviews from everyone for what a good job he did running around after one specific opposition player 
    You're being really mopey today, and it's getting a bit repetitive across the threads. Maybe take a break.
    All this talk of binning off Maddison has aroused my ire
    IF we see Maddison go it'll add to the argument that Bowyer can only manage easy to manage players and that he can only use already decent players and doesn't in fact make any players better, he just bins the ones that don't play well for a spell. 
    Nonsense
    Don't see how it is, what hard to manage players has he had?

    What players have genuinely improved under Bowyer? A few have gone backwards. 

    Taylor didn’t exactly smack me as easy for example, I don’t know the personalities of individual players. 

    As for improvement. Well Taylor, Grant, Gallagher, Doughty, Belik, Cullen, Aribo etc etc 
    He didn't manage Taylor very well did he?

    - Taylor had a good season before joining us. 14 goals and 7 assists in a struggling side. 

    - Gallagher arrived already good enough to smash the Championship. 

    - Doughty hasn't really improved a great deal IMO, arrived quick and with a sometimes sloppy touch and a decent cross, was the same before his injury. Looked like he'd improved over last season because the opposition and some of his team mates this season are worse. 

    - Cullen was already really good he slotted straight in for a reason.

    - Aribo was decent the season before we got promoted.

    - Grant had his penny drop moment at Crawley. He is a fair shout, even if I don't agree that it was entirely down to Bowyer. 

    - Bielik probably your best shout. 

    - Leko could have been a great argument against what I said too. 

    - Field didn't really improve.

    - Hemed got much worse after looking useful at first. 

    - Pearce has regressed 

    - Purrington improved, then regressed. 

    - Solly got worse

    - F.Caskey looks an improvement, but once again we're in a lower league. 

    - Lapslie was always Lapslie, immediately improved upon going elsewhere (admittedly a lower level)

    - Fosu got worse

    - Marshall got worse

    - Josh Parker improved... Still couldn't hit a barn door... 

    - Sarr was Sarr, hero to villain at a moments notice. 

    - Dijksteel improved

    - Matt Smith looked awful from the start, but has played plenty in a better side since. 

    - Oztumer has looked awful under Bow - Got worse 

    - Williams has got worse. 

    He'd be better off saying "we make some players better, the ones who want it and work for it" 

    Anyway let's move on this isn't the thread for it. 

  • Charlton Life record! 2 pages in to a new signing thread and we’re listing past players that were/weren’t improved under bowyer. 
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,824
    The Arsenal Reconnection Does In Swindon

    Who ?
     
    I don’t understand that @Val@Valiantphil

  • Fosu has improved while Bowyer has been our manager 
  • Dave Rudd
    Dave Rudd Posts: 2,865
    Cafc43v3r said:
    Dave Rudd said:
    I haven't done the groundwork yet (for which I apologise), but the arrival of Matt Smith forms the basis for a nice quiz question:

    Apart from the obvious 1947 team, which Charlton players (past and present) have an FA Cup Winners medal?
    Smith, Barnes, Blomquist, Crooks, Maxie Miller, Watson, Pates, Jeffers, Murphy? 
    It's a good list.

    Not sure about Pates.
  • Dave Rudd
    Dave Rudd Posts: 2,865
    edited February 2021
    The Arsenal Reconnection Does In Swindon

    Who ?
     
    I don’t understand that @Val@Valiantphil

    TARDIS.