Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Rumours Rumours - Summer 2021 edition (Deadline Day from p814)

1724725727729730867

Comments

  • Cafc43v3r said:
    Have a feeling we’re going to have something substantive to talk about tomorrow 
    What you mean why didn't we sign someone again? 

    Worse than that, we sell Kirk to Millwall.
  • edited August 2021
    Sage said:
    Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.
    Stockley was never the replacement for Aneke. We wanted both to be at the club, Aneke chose to move to The Championship.

    The fact is, we haven’t replaced him and his impact and we most certainly won’t find someone this late in the window that will.

    Stockley and Aneke are different players, quite simply Aneke is a better player who has struggled with fitness/minutes for a number of reasons.

    We missed out on the play-offs when we had Stockley and Aneke. We haven’t got a hope in hell when we only have Stockley.
    Sure, the club wanted both and to say it how I did didn’t make a lot of sense. Obviously both were here at the same time so acting as if they were directly replacing each other doesn’t make sense.

    With all that said, I just don’t think it’s quite the drama you’re making out. You would’ve been laughed off the forum if you had Aneke down for double digits this time last season. Who says Ronnie can’t be that guy this year? (LOL count just shot up I know). If it’s not him, I am expecting at least a loan arrival to walk through the door and provide those goals.

    Getting a player in that has a skill set similar to Aneke’s is near on impossible. He’s big, he’s strong, he’s quick, he can score with his head and both feet. He’s only playing in the lower leagues owing to his injury history.

    We just have to find someone who can chip in with enough goals. Last year we scored 70 which was one of the best returns in the league. Aneke grabbed 15, Washington 11 and Stockley 8.

    If Stockley can get to Aneke’s 15, Washington back to 11, all we need from Player X (Schwartz, incoming loan, etc) is 8-10 goals.
  • Sage said:
    Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.
    Stockley was never the replacement for Aneke. We wanted both to be at the club, Aneke chose to move to The Championship.

    The fact is, we haven’t replaced him and his impact and we most certainly won’t find someone this late in the window that will.

    Stockley and Aneke are different players, quite simply Aneke is a better player who has struggled with fitness/minutes for a number of reasons.

    We missed out on the play-offs when we had Stockley and Aneke. We haven’t got a hope in hell when we only have Stockley.
    Sure, the club wanted both and to say it how I did didn’t make a lot of sense. Obviously both were here at the same time so acting as if they were directly replacing each other doesn’t make sense.

    With all that said, I just don’t think it’s quite the drama you’re making out. You would’ve been laughed off the forum if you had Aneke down for double digits this time last season. Who says Ronnie can’t be that guy this year? (LOL count just shot up I know). If it’s not him, I am expecting at least a loan arrival to walk through the door and provide those goals.

    Getting a player in that has a skill set similar to Aneke’s is near on impossible. He’s big, he’s strong, he’s quick, he can score with his head and both feet. He’s only playing in the lower leagues owing to his injury history.

    We just have to find someone who can chip in with enough goals. Last year we scored 70 which was one of the best returns in the league. Aneke grabbed 15, Washington 11 and Stockley 8.

    If Stockley can get to Aneke’s 15, Washington back to 11, all we need from Player X (Schwartz, incoming loan, etc) is 8-10 goals.
    Stop gibbering.
    We haven't replaced Aneke. Period
    Ok I’ll let you be upset in peace. Have a nice evening.
  • Sage said:
    Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.
    Stockley was never the replacement for Aneke. We wanted both to be at the club, Aneke chose to move to The Championship.

    The fact is, we haven’t replaced him and his impact and we most certainly won’t find someone this late in the window that will.

    Stockley and Aneke are different players, quite simply Aneke is a better player who has struggled with fitness/minutes for a number of reasons.

    We missed out on the play-offs when we had Stockley and Aneke. We haven’t got a hope in hell when we only have Stockley.
    Sure, the club wanted both and to say it how I did didn’t make a lot of sense. Obviously both were here at the same time so acting as if they were directly replacing each other doesn’t make sense.

    With all that said, I just don’t think it’s quite the drama you’re making out. You would’ve been laughed off the forum if you had Aneke down for double digits this time last season. Who says Ronnie can’t be that guy this year? (LOL count just shot up I know). If it’s not him, I am expecting at least a loan arrival to walk through the door and provide those goals.

    Getting a player in that has a skill set similar to Aneke’s is near on impossible. He’s big, he’s strong, he’s quick, he can score with his head and both feet. He’s only playing in the lower leagues owing to his injury history.

    We just have to find someone who can chip in with enough goals. Last year we scored 70 which was one of the best returns in the league. Aneke grabbed 15, Washington 11 and Stockley 8.

    If Stockley can get to Aneke’s 15, Washington back to 11, all we need from Player X (Schwartz, incoming loan, etc) is 8-10 goals.
    Stop gibbering.
    We haven't replaced Aneke. Period
    This. Less is more sometimes
  • Sage said:
    Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.
    Stockley was never the replacement for Aneke. We wanted both to be at the club, Aneke chose to move to The Championship.

    The fact is, we haven’t replaced him and his impact and we most certainly won’t find someone this late in the window that will.

    Stockley and Aneke are different players, quite simply Aneke is a better player who has struggled with fitness/minutes for a number of reasons.

    We missed out on the play-offs when we had Stockley and Aneke. We haven’t got a hope in hell when we only have Stockley.
    Sure, the club wanted both and to say it how I did didn’t make a lot of sense. Obviously both were here at the same time so acting as if they were directly replacing each other doesn’t make sense.

    With all that said, I just don’t think it’s quite the drama you’re making out. You would’ve been laughed off the forum if you had Aneke down for double digits this time last season. Who says Ronnie can’t be that guy this year? (LOL count just shot up I know). If it’s not him, I am expecting at least a loan arrival to walk through the door and provide those goals.

    Getting a player in that has a skill set similar to Aneke’s is near on impossible. He’s big, he’s strong, he’s quick, he can score with his head and both feet. He’s only playing in the lower leagues owing to his injury history.

    We just have to find someone who can chip in with enough goals. Last year we scored 70 which was one of the best returns in the league. Aneke grabbed 15, Washington 11 and Stockley 8.

    If Stockley can get to Aneke’s 15, Washington back to 11, all we need from Player X (Schwartz, incoming loan, etc) is 8-10 goals.

    Um .  One shot on target in 5 games.

    Yes Stockley is well on track for 15, Washington for 11 and Player X to get 10 !!!
  • Sponsored links:


  • I didn’t deny we’re shite. I’m not sure how you got one shot on target from five games when we’ve scored twice though!

    Apparently trying to engage in a discussion isn’t welcome at the moment. Everyone needs a little breather before they give themselves an aneurysm. I’ll get back in my box until then.
  • Sage said:
    Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.
    Stockley was never the replacement for Aneke. We wanted both to be at the club, Aneke chose to move to The Championship.

    The fact is, we haven’t replaced him and his impact and we most certainly won’t find someone this late in the window that will.

    Stockley and Aneke are different players, quite simply Aneke is a better player who has struggled with fitness/minutes for a number of reasons.

    We missed out on the play-offs when we had Stockley and Aneke. We haven’t got a hope in hell when we only have Stockley.
    Sure, the club wanted both and to say it how I did didn’t make a lot of sense. Obviously both were here at the same time so acting as if they were directly replacing each other doesn’t make sense.

    With all that said, I just don’t think it’s quite the drama you’re making out. You would’ve been laughed off the forum if you had Aneke down for double digits this time last season. Who says Ronnie can’t be that guy this year? (LOL count just shot up I know). If it’s not him, I am expecting at least a loan arrival to walk through the door and provide those goals.

    Getting a player in that has a skill set similar to Aneke’s is near on impossible. He’s big, he’s strong, he’s quick, he can score with his head and both feet. He’s only playing in the lower leagues owing to his injury history.

    We just have to find someone who can chip in with enough goals. Last year we scored 70 which was one of the best returns in the league. Aneke grabbed 15, Washington 11 and Stockley 8.

    If Stockley can get to Aneke’s 15, Washington back to 11, all we need from Player X (Schwartz, incoming loan, etc) is 8-10 goals.
    And we'll miss out on the play offs again.
    We needed/need to improve.
  • I didn’t deny we’re shite. I’m not sure how you got one shot on target from five games when we’ve scored twice though!

    Apparently trying to engage in a discussion isn’t welcome at the moment. Everyone needs a little breather before they give themselves an aneurysm. I’ll get back in my box until then.
    One goal was a penalty.  Not a shot on target in open play.  A free shot when the referee decides a foul happens. 

    The issue is your discussion just doesn't make sense.  EVEN if I said ok, have the penalty as a shot on target that's TWO SHOTS IN 5 GAMES!!!

    Man alive that's an utterly depressing statistic thaf doesn't look like changing soon. 



  • edited August 2021
    Sage said:
    Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.
    Stockley was never the replacement for Aneke. We wanted both to be at the club, Aneke chose to move to The Championship.

    The fact is, we haven’t replaced him and his impact and we most certainly won’t find someone this late in the window that will.

    Stockley and Aneke are different players, quite simply Aneke is a better player who has struggled with fitness/minutes for a number of reasons.

    We missed out on the play-offs when we had Stockley and Aneke. We haven’t got a hope in hell when we only have Stockley.
    Sure, the club wanted both and to say it how I did didn’t make a lot of sense. Obviously both were here at the same time so acting as if they were directly replacing each other doesn’t make sense.

    With all that said, I just don’t think it’s quite the drama you’re making out. You would’ve been laughed off the forum if you had Aneke down for double digits this time last season. Who says Ronnie can’t be that guy this year? (LOL count just shot up I know). If it’s not him, I am expecting at least a loan arrival to walk through the door and provide those goals.

    Getting a player in that has a skill set similar to Aneke’s is near on impossible. He’s big, he’s strong, he’s quick, he can score with his head and both feet. He’s only playing in the lower leagues owing to his injury history.

    We just have to find someone who can chip in with enough goals. Last year we scored 70 which was one of the best returns in the league. Aneke grabbed 15, Washington 11 and Stockley 8.

    If Stockley can get to Aneke’s 15, Washington back to 11, all we need from Player X (Schwartz, incoming loan, etc) is 8-10 goals.
    And we'll miss out on the play offs again.
    We needed/need to improve.
    I'd argue that we didn't miss out because of our goals. We missed out because we couldn't defend.

    In an ideal world, would we have three strikers that have all proven they can score goals at this level? Obviously. Do I think it's a priority? Probably not. Stockley and Washington are our goal getters this year. Pigott and Bonne are Ipswich's options, Wyke and Keane are Wigan's etc.

    Much more pressing in my mind is a resolution to the left back / full back issue. We will never see promotion with Gunter, Matthews and Purrington as our full back options. Get a couple of players in like Dujon Sterling at right back, Conor Grant at left back (two names that have been mentioned on here by myself and others) and watch the team be transformed.
  • Sage said:
    Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.
    Stockley was never the replacement for Aneke. We wanted both to be at the club, Aneke chose to move to The Championship.

    The fact is, we haven’t replaced him and his impact and we most certainly won’t find someone this late in the window that will.

    Stockley and Aneke are different players, quite simply Aneke is a better player who has struggled with fitness/minutes for a number of reasons.

    We missed out on the play-offs when we had Stockley and Aneke. We haven’t got a hope in hell when we only have Stockley.
    Sure, the club wanted both and to say it how I did didn’t make a lot of sense. Obviously both were here at the same time so acting as if they were directly replacing each other doesn’t make sense.

    With all that said, I just don’t think it’s quite the drama you’re making out. You would’ve been laughed off the forum if you had Aneke down for double digits this time last season. Who says Ronnie can’t be that guy this year? (LOL count just shot up I know). If it’s not him, I am expecting at least a loan arrival to walk through the door and provide those goals.

    Getting a player in that has a skill set similar to Aneke’s is near on impossible. He’s big, he’s strong, he’s quick, he can score with his head and both feet. He’s only playing in the lower leagues owing to his injury history.

    We just have to find someone who can chip in with enough goals. Last year we scored 70 which was one of the best returns in the league. Aneke grabbed 15, Washington 11 and Stockley 8.

    If Stockley can get to Aneke’s 15, Washington back to 11, all we need from Player X (Schwartz, incoming loan, etc) is 8-10 goals.
    And we'll miss out on the play offs again.
    We needed/need to improve.
    I'd argue that we didn't miss out because of our goals. We missed out because we couldn't defend.

    In an ideal world, would we have three strikers that have all proven they can score goals at this level? Obviously. Do I think it's a priority? Probably not. Stockley and Washington are our goal getters this year. Pigott and Bonne are Ipswich's options, Wyke and Keane are Wigan's etc.

    Much more pressing in my mind is a resolution to the left back / full back issue. We will never see promotion with Gunter, Matthews and Purrington as our full back options. Get a couple of players in like Dujon Sterling at right back, Conor Grant at left back (two names that have been mentioned on here by myself and others) and watch the team be transformed.
    It's our midfielder we need to drastically change.   Protect the ball, protect the defence and play football through the lines and the defence is better than last year.  
  • Unless we’re talking Ronaldo, this place would go up in flames if we made another signing aged over 35!
  • Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Totally agree. However, looking at the squad it seems that we have replaced Aneke......with Davison. Adkins basically said this 3 weeks ago when he bigged him up & played him against Palace in the psf. 

    Last season we sent Davison out on loan

    This season he is in the matchday squad .....and coming on. 
  • Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.

    Stockley is not Aneke's replacement. Stockley was here last season WITH Aneke. Aneke has now left.....Stockley is still here.

    20/21  -  Stockley & Aneke

    21/22  -  Stockley 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Valley11 said:
    And while we’re on bizarre decisions; why was Maynard-Brewer sent to Ross County to sit on the bench?! He could do that here. 
    We give game time to kids who aren’t ready but a keeper who was number two all last season, is sent to Scotland.
    Something definitely feels awry with our recruitment team. 
    We have a recall option which I am sure will be exercised if he has not been playing regularly by January. What makes it more strange is before he signed on loan for them, surely we would have had discussions about ensuring he is to play otherwise he would have gone elsewhere.
  • edited August 2021
    Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.

    Stockley is not Aneke's replacement. Stockley was here last season WITH Aneke. Aneke has now left.....Stockley is still here.

    20/21  -  Stockley & Aneke

    21/22  -  Stockley 
    And what I was saying was…

    20/21 - 34 goals between Aneke, Stockley and Washington

    21/22 - 25 goals between Stockley and Washington is a fair expectation?

    Replacing Aneke with another 15-20 goal-a-year man would’ve been ideal but in order to simply match what we managed last year (70 goals as a team wasn’t bad at all) we only need an 8-9 goal man, not a 15-20 goal superstar.
  • edited August 2021
    I think an improvement in full-backs would lead to an improvement in the midfield. In the 4-3-3 that Adkins seems to favour there are three forwards but no traditional wingers out wide. It needs attacking FBs to provide that width.

    IF we somehow manage to rectify this, it gives Clare and Dobson other options than simply lumping it long to Stockley or giving it to Morgan who just isn't a proper playmaker in current form, but again might have more luck with overlapping fullbacks to pass to instead of playing in a narrow corridor.

    Will the midfield suddenly become creative dynamos? Probably not. Has Adkins contributed (in part) to his own problems by completely committing to a formation we don't have the players for? Probably yes.

    But for me, the wide areas in general and full backs in particular are actually at the root of a lot of our problems.
  • Sage said:
    Not signing a left back already is criminal. However, what’s worse, far worse, is not looking to replace Aneke and his goals. How on earth can you expect to get into the top 6 when you don’t even look to replace your top scorer and most impactful player. It’s absolutely criminal.

    Failure to bring in a left back is bad enough. Failure to replace Aneke is saying you’re naive and stupid enough to think you can be successful. 
    Stockley is/was the Aneke replacement. Aneke managed 15 goals across a whole season, Stockley got 8 in a half season.

    Not denying we are still a body light though. We need someone to replace those Stockley goals. And ideally not wait until January to bring them in.
    Was always going to be different under Adkins. Bows would have started Stockley/Washington with Aneke as the substitute, Adkins won't be thinking that he needs to do the same. I've never felt we necessarily needed to replace Aneke's goals because the intended tactics/style of play won't rely on it. Bowyer didn't have any attacking midfielders scoring goals, Adkins got goals from Gilbey and should have more depth out wide. If we get the service right and had a central midfielder chipping in, we wouldn't be doing bad. The real issue is going to be Stockley's cover more than a substitution IMO, Davison is the man currently but not good enough. 
  • Valley11 said:
    And while we’re on bizarre decisions; why was Maynard-Brewer sent to Ross County to sit on the bench?! He could do that here. 
    We give game time to kids who aren’t ready but a keeper who was number two all last season, is sent to Scotland.
    Something definitely feels awry with our recruitment team. 
    People im sure we had that discussion with ross county about playing him but lets not forget Abit like levitt and the smiths from arsenal and city im sure we told them and there clubs they would all get a decent amount of game time it didnt happen and they sat on out benches or even worse not even in the squads at all

    it happens both ways sometimes and not all loans work out unfortunately
  • Valley11 said:
    And while we’re on bizarre decisions; why was Maynard-Brewer sent to Ross County to sit on the bench?! He could do that here. 
    We give game time to kids who aren’t ready but a keeper who was number two all last season, is sent to Scotland.
    Something definitely feels awry with our recruitment team. 
    That really is a bizarre one I agree.
  • I know the current ownership have tended to get deals done under the radar, and by that i mean they haven't always been common knowledge without many people posting inside info but we are less than a week away from deadline day and as far as i'm aware there has not been a single credible rumour on here for days. It's pretty concerning.

    What happened to the Spurs kid (Tobi Omole?) we were linked with? He is still there, played for their U23s the other night.
    Josh Sims?
    Jack Tucker is still at Gillingham.
    Lowery at Crewe? Did Gallen go there last week or not?
    Jephcott is still at Plymouth.
    What about loans from the big clubs? Isn't there a Chelsea kid we can take on loan given our good connections there? Man City have a huge academy, must be 1-2 good kids there.
    Liverpool must've been pleased with Millar's loan given he was in the shop window and they then sold him, so we're in credit with them. 

    At this rate we'll be signing Madger Gomes on a short term deal.



  • This shows everything RD did wrong our one season in the Championship in 2019-20. Only losing £1.1M in a division where £10M+ is the norm is why we went down. If RD had just been willing to spend £9M more that season, he would have lost no more money than he did in 2018 and 2019. Nine million could easily have brought four 1.5 million dollar transfers, each player making £750k/year in wages. Add those four starters to our weakest positions in 2020 and we would have easily stayed up and might have been mid-table. The club would have attracted much more attention from potential investors and in the end Roland would have made much more money. Instead he rolled the dice he could break even and we would stay up. He was wrong. We had the third lowest payroll and finished third from bottom. The very definition of penny-wise and pound foolish.
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!