Opposition players just bounce off him - he is incredibly strong on the ball. Very poor level of fitness.
It’s amazing how he can control the ball with a centre back on his back like it’s nothing. Compared to Stockley who can’t control a long ball even if there is no defender on him. Makes so much difference
Such a pity he can't last more than 20 minutes...
My Mrs is usually relatively pleased when I last that long.
If you could guarantee me that he could play half an hour every game from here to the end of the season l, I’d snap your hand off. Comfortably the best substitute in league 1.
If you could guarantee me that he could play half an hour every game from here to the end of the season l, I’d snap your hand off. Comfortably the best substitute in league 1.
Relative to his level, he might be the best sub in Europe.
Chuks suits the direction we want to go in, even if he can only ever be a super sub. He’s not going to be part of a high press but he makes things happen when he’s on the pitch.
Stockley doesn’t look as good a player as he did before this season and it can’t only be down to the formation and style of play. Confidence is one thing but I do wonder if he’s playing with an injury or previous injuries have had an impact.
We need a new striker in January and it wouldn’t surprise me if Stockley moved on to help that happen. 4-3-3 would be much more effective with a strong mobile striker with a decent touch.
Chuks suits the direction we want to go in, even if he can only ever be a super sub. He’s not going to be part of a high press but he makes things happen when he’s on the pitch.
Stockley doesn’t look as good a player as he did before this season and it can’t only be down to the formation and style of play. Confidence is one thing but I do wonder if he’s playing with an injury or previous injuries have had an impact.
We need a new striker in January and it wouldn’t surprise me if Stockley moved on to help that happen. 4-3-3 would be much more effective with a strong mobile striker with a decent touch.
I was watching Stockley quite closely in the MK Dons game, as much as you can on the stream.
He isn't the same player that arrived at the club nearly 2 years ago. He was never going to run the the channels and get in behind but he wasn't this slow to react. To me he looks like he is in real pain, or fear of pain. Or his confidence in his body, or ability, is so shot he isn't even trying.
Playing him every week is only making it worse but we don't have much choice really.
Back to Aneke we will never see the 20 minutes version extended to 60 or 70 from the start. Yes it's unfortunate, yes it highlights other problems but starting Chuks isn't a viable, even short term, solution.
Chuks suits the direction we want to go in, even if he can only ever be a super sub. He’s not going to be part of a high press but he makes things happen when he’s on the pitch.
Stockley doesn’t look as good a player as he did before this season and it can’t only be down to the formation and style of play. Confidence is one thing but I do wonder if he’s playing with an injury or previous injuries have had an impact.
We need a new striker in January and it wouldn’t surprise me if Stockley moved on to help that happen. 4-3-3 would be much more effective with a strong mobile striker with a decent touch.
I was watching Stockley quite closely in the MK Dons game, as much as you can on the stream.
He isn't the same player that arrived at the club nearly 2 years ago. He was never going to run the the channels and get in behind but he wasn't this slow to react. To me he looks like he is in real pain, or fear of pain. Or his confidence in his body, or ability, is so shot he isn't even trying.
Playing him every week is only making it worse but we don't have much choice really.
Back to Aneke we will never see the 20 minutes version extended to 60 or 70 from the start. Yes it's unfortunate, yes it highlights other problems but starting Chuks isn't a viable, even short term, solution.
And I’d rather not risk it to be honest as he offers so much from the bench.
Chuks suits the direction we want to go in, even if he can only ever be a super sub. He’s not going to be part of a high press but he makes things happen when he’s on the pitch.
Stockley doesn’t look as good a player as he did before this season and it can’t only be down to the formation and style of play. Confidence is one thing but I do wonder if he’s playing with an injury or previous injuries have had an impact.
We need a new striker in January and it wouldn’t surprise me if Stockley moved on to help that happen. 4-3-3 would be much more effective with a strong mobile striker with a decent touch.
I was watching Stockley quite closely in the MK Dons game, as much as you can on the stream.
He isn't the same player that arrived at the club nearly 2 years ago. He was never going to run the the channels and get in behind but he wasn't this slow to react. To me he looks like he is in real pain, or fear of pain. Or his confidence in his body, or ability, is so shot he isn't even trying.
Playing him every week is only making it worse but we don't have much choice really.
Back to Aneke we will never see the 20 minutes version extended to 60 or 70 from the start. Yes it's unfortunate, yes it highlights other problems but starting Chuks isn't a viable, even short term, solution.
And I’d rather not risk it to be honest as he offers so much from the bench.
I think it's even bigger than that. He can't play like that for 70-90 so it completely over rides the risk.
Opposition players just bounce off him - he is incredibly strong on the ball. Very poor level of fitness.
It’s amazing how he can control the ball with a centre back on his back like it’s nothing. Compared to Stockley who can’t control a long ball even if there is no defender on him. Makes so much difference
Such a pity he can't last more than 20 minutes...
My Mrs is usually relatively pleased when I last that long.
Otherwise she could be looking at other options from the bench?
We signed someone on a three and a half year contract who can only play 20 minutes even when fit, have another player up top who doesn't suit the system and expected an 18 year old who hadn't played a League game prior to this to do the business from the off.
We needed to sign two forwards pre season albeit that was prior to young Leaburn's elevation. As per usual, left it to last knockings to seal a deal, as if this is nothing but a game of brinkmanship, by which time the window door had been well and truly slammed. That one quality striker would have been the difference between being 9th as we are now and almost certainly the bare minimum of the play offs.
There is only one person to blame for that and that isn't Aneke, isn't Stockley and certainly isn't Leaburn. It's the bloke who signs the cheques.
If you could guarantee me that he could play half an hour every game from here to the end of the season l, I’d snap your hand off. Comfortably the best substitute in league 1.
In my mind, that's exactly why Chuks was re-signed - to be that quality impact sub.
He was already proven in that role under Lee Bowyer, with the fact that tiring defences couldn't handle him plus the sheer number of goals he scored from the bench.
2 cup games now, I expect chucks to be rested for the pointless game on Tuesday and the I would also rest him on Saturday.
Stockley looks so shot of confidence, we should start him in at least one of the cup games as we will likely create chances in both. I would also give Kanu game time to see if he can force himself into the match day squad
If you could guarantee me that he could play half an hour every game from here to the end of the season l, I’d snap your hand off. Comfortably the best substitute in league 1.
Chuks suits the direction we want to go in, even if he can only ever be a super sub. He’s not going to be part of a high press but he makes things happen when he’s on the pitch.
Stockley doesn’t look as good a player as he did before this season and it can’t only be down to the formation and style of play. Confidence is one thing but I do wonder if he’s playing with an injury or previous injuries have had an impact.
We need a new striker in January and it wouldn’t surprise me if Stockley moved on to help that happen. 4-3-3 would be much more effective with a strong mobile striker with a decent touch.
I was watching Stockley quite closely in the MK Dons game, as much as you can on the stream.
He isn't the same player that arrived at the club nearly 2 years ago. He was never going to run the the channels and get in behind but he wasn't this slow to react. To me he looks like he is in real pain, or fear of pain. Or his confidence in his body, or ability, is so shot he isn't even trying.
Playing him every week is only making it worse but we don't have much choice really.
Back to Aneke we will never see the 20 minutes version extended to 60 or 70 from the start. Yes it's unfortunate, yes it highlights other problems but starting Chuks isn't a viable, even short term, solution.
I'd agree with that, he's definitely playing through some kind of injury/pain. He hasn't looked right for weeks (maybe months) and i suspect that if we had a viable alternative then he wouldn't be starting every game.
It's clear to me and pretty much everyone else that he doesn't suit the way Garner wants to play but he doesn't deserve abuse or to be called shit (by some fans) because i'm convinced he's putting the team above his own fitness simply by being out there.
If you could guarantee me that he could play half an hour every game from here to the end of the season l, I’d snap your hand off. Comfortably the best substitute in league 1.
That Ladapo for Ipswich tbf!
He is a funny player. Blows very hot and cold. Also, believe he was a bit of a nightmare to manage at Rotherham for Paul Warne. Can be brilliant on his day, but he has games where he hardly touches the ball. Aneke seems to be more consistent when he is fit.
I have no problem that we signed Aneke on a 3 and a half year deal just to play off the bench. It gives us something that no other team in this division has. The problem is, we then need sign enough quality to actually start.
Cheat code Noticed on Saturday when he got past that Ipswich defender on the byline that he basically had him in a headlock and threw him to the floor. Love his intensity.
I don’t get this contract with Aneke. Yes, he might be more talented than many in League One, but I wouldn’t employ a guy who turned up at 3 o’clock and knocked off at 5.30.
Opposition players just bounce off him - he is incredibly strong on the ball. Very poor level of fitness.
It’s amazing how he can control the ball with a centre back on his back like it’s nothing. Compared to Stockley who can’t control a long ball even if there is no defender on him. Makes so much difference
Such a pity he can't last more than 20 minutes...
My Mrs is usually relatively pleased when I last that long.
It's like Danny Haynes, big talent plus some quality games and goals but it's not sustainable given his body. If we hadn't re-signed Chuks for 3.5 years he'd also have been bouncing around Ebbsfleet and non league before long.
Comments
Chuks suits the direction we want to go in, even if he can only ever be a super sub. He’s not going to be part of a high press but he makes things happen when he’s on the pitch.
Stockley doesn’t look as good a player as he did before this season and it can’t only be down to the formation and style of play. Confidence is one thing but I do wonder if he’s playing with an injury or previous injuries have had an impact.
We need a new striker in January and it wouldn’t surprise me if Stockley moved on to help that happen. 4-3-3 would be much more effective with a strong mobile striker with a decent touch.
He isn't the same player that arrived at the club nearly 2 years ago. He was never going to run the the channels and get in behind but he wasn't this slow to react. To me he looks like he is in real pain, or fear of pain. Or his confidence in his body, or ability, is so shot he isn't even trying.
Playing him every week is only making it worse but we don't have much choice really.
Back to Aneke we will never see the 20 minutes version extended to 60 or 70 from the start. Yes it's unfortunate, yes it highlights other problems but starting Chuks isn't a viable, even short term, solution.
We needed to sign two forwards pre season albeit that was prior to young Leaburn's elevation. As per usual, left it to last knockings to seal a deal, as if this is nothing but a game of brinkmanship, by which time the window door had been well and truly slammed. That one quality striker would have been the difference between being 9th as we are now and almost certainly the bare minimum of the play offs.
There is only one person to blame for that and that isn't Aneke, isn't Stockley and certainly isn't Leaburn. It's the bloke who signs the cheques.
He was already proven in that role under Lee Bowyer, with the fact that tiring defences couldn't handle him plus the sheer number of goals he scored from the bench.
I feel sure that's why Jacko brought him back.
Could be utilised as a plan b - preferably from the hour mark
Stockley looks so shot of confidence, we should start him in at least one of the cup games as we will likely create chances in both. I would also give Kanu game time to see if he can force himself into the match day squad
It's clear to me and pretty much everyone else that he doesn't suit the way Garner wants to play but he doesn't deserve abuse or to be called shit (by some fans) because i'm convinced he's putting the team above his own fitness simply by being out there.
I have no problem that we signed Aneke on a 3 and a half year deal just to play off the bench. It gives us something that no other team in this division has. The problem is, we then need sign enough quality to actually start.
Noticed on Saturday when he got past that Ipswich defender on the byline that he basically had him in a headlock and threw him to the floor. Love his intensity.