Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Chuks Aneke - speculation re 2023/24 season (p60)

1414244464769

Comments

  • Aneke!
    Aneke!
    Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!Aneke!
  • Man is a goal machine. Just can't keep him fit for long enough 
  • Shame about the penalty :) so what is it 13/1/1? in the league at any rate.
  • Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.

  • Sponsored links:


  • edited October 2022
    Not even in jest @CAFCsayer.
  • edited October 2022
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?
  • edited October 2022
    Let's hope Leaburn's injury isnt too serious as no way can Aneke start a game.

    Real shame he's so injury prone as at this level he's a proper handful.
  • Here’s the acid test though if Leaburn is out for an extended period of time will we ever feel confident to start Chuks in a game?

    If not we won’t be able to go 4-4-2, and will likely have to revert back to the 4-3-3 and hope that we are still in the game by the time we can bring Chuks on for his cameo. 
  • I may be wrong but have any of Chuks injuries been a repeat of an existing injury? I don't think they have from memory. The calf one is the first that repeated itself, but that just delayed his return.
  • Here’s the acid test though if Leaburn is out for an extended period of time will we ever feel confident to start Chuks in a game?

    If not we won’t be able to go 4-4-2, and will likely have to revert back to the 4-3-3 and hope that we are still in the game by the time we can bring Chuks on for his cameo. 
    Hopefully we could stick CBT up front as a makeshift forward if needed. Because Stockley really needs someone who can run beyond.
  • Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?
    Typical of you Callum, I throw in a line that should have brought an end to the conversation and you come back with stat, stat bloody stat. 😂

    However you make a good case so carry on 👍🏻
  • edited October 2022
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?
    Typical of you Callum, I throw in a line that should have brought an end to the conversation and you come back with stat, stat bloody stat. 😂

    However you make a good case so carry on 👍🏻
    Sorry! It's the world I live in! Need to rein it in sometimes.
  • edited October 2022
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?

    Not sure it is "almost three years"?  That would be going back to October 2019 and since then Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited October 2022
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?

    Not sure it is "almost three years"?  That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
    MINUTES PER GOAL
  • Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?
    Typical of you Callum, I throw in a line that should have brought an end to the conversation and you come back with stat, stat bloody stat. 😂

    However you make a good case so carry on 👍🏻
    Sorry! It's the world I live in! Need to rein it in sometimes.
    I was having a laugh with you mate, you produce some fantastic stats so carry on the good work, don’t rein anything in.
  • Everyone on the team seemed to get a lift when he came on
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?

    Not sure it is "almost three years"?  That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
    MINUTES PER GOAL
    Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.


  • Dazzler21 said:
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?

    Not sure it is "almost three years"?  That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
    MINUTES PER GOAL
    Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.


    League above. Covered by the "Third Tier" part of the comment.
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?

    Not sure it is "almost three years"?  That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
    MINUTES PER GOAL
    Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.


    League above. Covered by the "Third Tier" part of the comment.
    Then it's not three years is it? You can't have it both ways unless we are calling this one game "a year"
  • Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?

    Not sure it is "almost three years"?  That would be going back to October 2019 and since then Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
    No he hasn't
  • edited October 2022
    Dazzler21 said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?

    Not sure it is "almost three years"?  That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
    MINUTES PER GOAL
    Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.


    League above. Covered by the "Third Tier" part of the comment.
    Then it's not three years is it? You can't have it both ways unless we are calling this one game "a year"
    "Almost three years" 

    Fuck it why am I arguing it's not even my stat or comment. 

    🤣
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Off_it said:
    He's got a better goals per minutes / touches record than that bloke at Man City.
    A third tier, injury prone Haaland is a great comparison to be fair.
    No it really isn't.


    Haaland is a monster in a league of his own obviously. But Chuks has been scoring better than a goal every 100 minutes for almost three years now. That's freakish in itself.

    20/21 - a goal every 102 mins
    21/22 - a goal every 111 mins
    22/23 - a goal every 15 mins

    Why isn't it a good comparison?

    Not sure it is "almost three years"?  That would be going back to October 2019 during which time Aneke has scored 22 goals. Haaland has scored 20 in 10 weeks.
    MINUTES PER GOAL
    Please don't shout Dazzer. The point I am making is that if we are going back three years for goals per minute then we have to include 2019-20 albeit from October onwards. Aneke didn't score a single goal from October onwards that season. Ignoring the first 9 games, he played for 431 minutes with zero goals.


    League above. Covered by the "Third Tier" part of the comment.
    Then it's not three years is it? You can't have it both ways unless we are calling this one game "a year"
    Pendant. :-)

    Call it two years if you want, I only said almost three because 20-21 started in 2020 and 22-23 will end in 2023.
  • lads, lads, come on .... we won.
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!