Non-Charlton fans would look at that and probably not really know which club it even represented.
I don't mind the sword without the rest of the club logo. (Same as last season's third kit). It's like just having the Queen on postage stamps, being aloof and not caring whether anyone knows which country they are from. However really don't like the stacked centred look. Sword and manufacturer should be to the sides.
Very rough paint job but think the proper badge and not central looks far better than what we've got unfortunately.
I actually do like that they seem to be doing just the sword on the third kits at the moment, but you're spot on with the placement, that would make it look much better
I really liked the gold sword on last years third, something about an all blue Charlton kit with no red makes me feel slightly uneasy though
Could someone please translate that into "wrinkly speak" for me ?
This is what Trev told me;
NFTs are basically JPEG images that you get a digital certificate of authenticity for to say you have the original copy.
There are other kinds of NFTs but the image based ones are most common I think.
So my reply was, ‘so it’s like modern art?’
I had no reply 🤷♀️
My friend runs a music copy-write company that you can by NFTs in called Opulous. NFT's are usually you own a full of one digital product or a share of a digital product. In my friends business he is working with some of the biggest artists out there that you own a share in the copy-write of a track from a musician and everytime it's streamed, played, downloaded etc you earn royalties.
But in this instance... it looks like there's could be either an image NFT or a crypto betting company? Judging by their tweets.
I’m so old. I have literally no idea what any of that means.
NFTs are basically JPEG images that you get a digital certificate of authenticity for to say you have the original copy.
There are other kinds of NFTs but the image based ones are most common I think.
So it’s modern art?
Well, they're essentially just a massive grift, so I guess it depends on your opinion of art. The theory is you have the original but you never actually physically own or have the right to physically own anything and there's absolutely nothing to stop someone reproducing the JPEG other than you don't want them to. I'm quite uncomfortable with us advertising this stuff
Move the logos away from the centre and the third would be a 7.5/10. Replace the sword with the round CAFC badge and it’s 8/10. Do both and it’s an 8.5/10.
Replace “Uni Of Greenwich” with RSK on the away shirt and it’s a 9/10.
Very rough paint job but think the proper badge and not central looks far better than what we've got unfortunately.
I actually do like that they seem to be doing just the sword on the third kits at the moment, but you're spot on with the placement, that would make it look much better
That doesn’t look good on an athlete like Stockley - Christ knows how that’s gonna look on the average adult fan!
Very rough paint job but think the proper badge and not central looks far better than what we've got unfortunately.
I actually do like that they seem to be doing just the sword on the third kits at the moment, but you're spot on with the placement, that would make it look much better
That doesn’t look good on an athlete like Stockley - Christ knows how that’s gonna look on the average adult fan!
I have no interest in buying tops, but this RSK totally dominates the top, from the sponsors viewpoint I get it. I assume clubs think that fans will buy any old s***.
I like all three kits tbf, they look decent. I canvassed my 7yr olds opinion though (the right age range for this kinda stuff). He was indifferent to the home and away, but his verdict on the 3rd "I want that football suit" 😂🤣😂. Not until they're on sale though mate!
was in the club shop today, other than a couple of casual t shirts and tracksuit type tops with iron on style badges it’s all team shirts, have to say the yellow goalkeeper top would have made a great away shirt, great shirt.
They do a whole bunch of repros of old Charlton shirts. Anybody actually bought one from here?
I got the remake of the blue and black one that inspired the current third kit and it was pretty crap unfortunately.
Took months to turn up, poor communication and then when it did arrive it had a bizarrely oversized Charlton badge on it. That then fell off in the wash and underneath it they had tried to print the badge on the shirt but the colours were wrong (weird gold colouring) and it had cut the top and bottom of the badge off.
Move the logos away from the centre and the third would be a 7.5/10. Replace the sword with the round CAFC badge and it’s 8/10. Do both and it’s an 8.5/10.
Replace “Uni Of Greenwich” with RSK on the away shirt and it’s a 9/10.
I think the Uni of Greenwich sponsor is much better. The RSK is super dull and blocky. The upside is the quality of the shirt, Hummels was dire.
Comments
There are other kinds of NFTs but the image based ones are most common I think.
So my reply was, ‘so it’s like modern art?’
I had no reply 🤷♀️
But in this instance... it looks like there's could be either an image NFT or a crypto betting company? Judging by their tweets.
Away 8.5/10
Third 7/10
Move the logos away from the centre and the third would be a 7.5/10. Replace the sword with the round CAFC badge and it’s 8/10. Do both and it’s an 8.5/10.
Replace “Uni Of Greenwich” with RSK on the away shirt and it’s a 9/10.
I assume clubs think that fans will buy any old s***.