Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Err. Slightly different.
Is my comment slightly different?
The always over-exaggerating poster, has already accused the Middle East of bribing referees this season.
If Arsenal fans have issue with that, and how Newcastle win games (no where have I suggested that anything in Saudi Arabia is acceptable), then they should be looking at their own history.
Or is there a time limit on when Football history can be discussed?
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Err. Slightly different.
Is my comment slightly different?
The always over-exaggerating poster, has already accused the Middle East of bribing referees this season.
If Arsenal fans have issue with that, and how Newcastle win games (no where have I suggested that anything in Saudi Arabia is acceptable), then they should be looking at their own history.
Or is there a time limit on when Football history can be discussed?
More like where their money comes from.
But the media and people will wave them in as 'plucky' because they're not the established elite.
Thought people learned after the Chelsea 'Russia' debacle but I guess not.
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Err. Slightly different.
Is my comment slightly different?
The always over-exaggerating poster, has already accused the Middle East of bribing referees this season.
If Arsenal fans have issue with that, and how Newcastle win games (no where have I suggested that anything in Saudi Arabia is acceptable), then they should be looking at their own history.
Or is there a time limit on when Football history can be discussed?
I don't really know or care about the history of the poster but his/her comment was about the owners of Newcastle being the state with blood money.
Given the well publicised Saudi genocide in Yemen as well as the treatment of their own people, then I felt comparing that ownership with Arsenal owners in 1919 bribing some people to be in the top league was somewhat different, yes.
You are an excellent poster on here and certainly better than that.
The ball was likely not out: with no definitive angle, it’s not enough to overturn the on field decision.
The “foul” was not a foul unless we’re making football a non contact sport.
The offside was the most confusing part of the check - the video I’ve seen doesn’t seem to ever provide a clear angle. But this is the one part of the process that’s meant to be black and white - if they’ve drawn the lines and said it’s onside, it must be onside.
Arteta’s post match interview is embarrassing for him and for the club he represents.
What's really impressive is how many of those Newcastle players were there before under Steve Bruce, but have been transformed under Howe, with so much more desire and workrate.
Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.
He's only 21 and cost 55m. So about 30m less than Antony and Mudryk, and also less than Havertz and Mount. But everyone will say City only win because they spend loads. No, they just spend well.
Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.
He's only 21 and cost 55m. So about 30m less than Antony and Mudryk, and also less than Havertz and Mount. But everyone will say City only win because they spend loads. No, they just spend well.
They spend 'well' because they've thrown money elsewhere to make transfers easier for them in the long run.
It's part of being another state-owned club with billions of pounds.
They also spent 200m this summer on essentially 4 players.
Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.
He's only 21 and cost 55m. So about 30m less than Antony and Mudryk, and also less than Havertz and Mount. But everyone will say City only win because they spend loads. No, they just spend well.
City make very sensible signings , can't think of many absolute duds they've have made in recent seasons - bar possibly the Kalvin Phillips move not working.
Says a lot about the form they are in when they aren't even starting £80m worth of CB in Josko Gvardiol yesterday.
How the hell has Havertz not been sent off? Thats all. Even Keown said he got lucky.
Was a naughty one that one but how about the elbow to the back of Jorginho's neck that VAR also looked at too? Definitely seemed there was some evening up in the dodgy decisions going on.
Doku is some signing by City. Hadn't heard of him before he joined. Look af some of the shite Utd sign in comparison.
He's only 21 and cost 55m. So about 30m less than Antony and Mudryk, and also less than Havertz and Mount. But everyone will say City only win because they spend loads. No, they just spend well.
They spend 'well' because they've thrown money elsewhere to make transfers easier for them in the long run.
It's part of being another state-owned club with billions of pounds.
They also spent 200m this summer on essentially 4 players.
You appear to have conveniently forgotten the players they have sold or have left on frees? In terms of salaries, they've got off the books in the last two seasons the likes of Sterling, Gundogan, Mendy, Jesus, Zinchenko, Mahrez, Palmer, Trafford, Porro, Lavia, Itakura etc etc
Spend £288m. Sales £252m. Net spend £36m. Man United's net spend in the same period is over £300m!!!
Stupid tackle by Havertz, but a red? Not for me. Think Bruno should have been sent off, but there was nothing wrong with the goal. I dislike Arteta more and more each week
Stupid tackle by Havertz, but a red? Not for me. Think Bruno should have been sent off, but there was nothing wrong with the goal. I dislike Arteta more and more each week
I thought that on a first watch, thought he missed with this first leg, and just caught with his trailing leg. But on watching it again (you know, like a VAR guy), he caught him a bit with the first leg too.
Shouldn't be let off because he only grazed the guy, was just luck.
Comments
Because Arsenal have always been saints.
Quite impressive given they're the one team currently in the top flight, who haven't won promotion to it.
Saudi Arabia are still beheading people to this day by the way.
Err. Slightly different.
The always over-exaggerating poster, has already accused the Middle East of bribing referees this season.
If Arsenal fans have issue with that, and how Newcastle win games (no where have I suggested that anything in Saudi Arabia is acceptable), then they should be looking at their own history.
Or is there a time limit on when Football history can be discussed?
But the media and people will wave them in as 'plucky' because they're not the established elite.
Thought people learned after the Chelsea 'Russia' debacle but I guess not.
I don't really know or care about the history of the poster but his/her comment was about the owners of Newcastle being the state with blood money.
Given the well publicised Saudi genocide in Yemen as well as the treatment of their own people, then I felt comparing that ownership with Arsenal owners in 1919 bribing some people to be in the top league was somewhat different, yes.
You are an excellent poster on here and certainly better than that.
The “foul” was not a foul unless we’re making football a non contact sport.
The offside was the most confusing part of the check - the video I’ve seen doesn’t seem to ever provide a clear angle. But this is the one part of the process that’s meant to be black and white - if they’ve drawn the lines and said it’s onside, it must be onside.
Arteta’s post match interview is embarrassing for him and for the club he represents.
How the hell has Havertz not been sent off?
Thats all. Even Keown said he got lucky.
can you be offside if you are level or behind the passer to you ?
Cunteta is right getting on my tits , they were shit, now just need spurs to fuck off and we can breath again for another season
It's part of being another state-owned club with billions of pounds.
They also spent 200m this summer on essentially 4 players.
City make very sensible signings , can't think of many absolute duds they've have made in recent seasons - bar possibly the Kalvin Phillips move not working.
Says a lot about the form they are in when they aren't even starting £80m worth of CB in Josko Gvardiol yesterday.
Spend £288m. Sales £252m. Net spend £36m. Man United's net spend in the same period is over £300m!!!
Think Bruno should have been sent off, but there was nothing wrong with the goal. I dislike Arteta more and more each week
Shouldn't be let off because he only grazed the guy, was just luck.