Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

London Overground - new line names revealed.

1356789

Comments

  • Rothko said:
    £6.3 Million properly allocated could pay salaries for (say) 200 nurses, perhaps 150 junior doctors, 200 school teachers etc etc .. anyone who says that £6.3 Million is NOT A LOT OF MONEY is an illiterate idiot
    You know it’s a different budget and different organisation, you’re not that thick?
    read the 'PROPERLY ALLOCATED' bit Rothicko .. 6.3 Million ridiculously allocated to this vanity nonsense instead of where it could do some good
  • What a complete waste of time, energy, and money.
  • What a waste of time and public money. I literally give up!
  • Rothko said:
    £6.3 Million properly allocated could pay salaries for (say) 200 nurses, perhaps 150 junior doctors, 200 school teachers etc etc .. anyone who says that £6.3 Million is NOT A LOT OF MONEY is an illiterate idiot
    You know it’s a different budget and different organisation, you’re not that thick?
    read the 'PROPERLY ALLOCATED' bit Rothicko .. 6.3 Million ridiculously allocated to this vanity nonsense instead of where it could do some good
    You been hanging out with fhe Lincolnshire hillbillies too much, TfL doesn’t received direct funding from central government, so it’s using TfL own fare revenue to fund this, as well as funding others big fat pay rises and the freeze on fares 
  • MrOneLung said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    Like the sound of the Windrush and Weaver Lines...

    The Liberty Line... Sounds like it would be better off being in New York

    Liberty line is the only one I really have issue with because as you say it could be absolutely anywhere even with the explanation from TfL 
    As someone who lives in Borough of Havering I can only say WTF !!
    I’d have thought you wouldn’t have such a strong opinion and would be havering.


  • Or maybe it could have been named the Brunel line after the brilliant engineers who built the tunnel under the Thames it uses.
    Wouldn't really fit the narrative though.
  • Sponsored links:


  • £6.3 Million well spent (hahahaha) .. Sadiq Khan and his phoney crew are an absolute waste of space .. more P C tosh ..
    Lioness Line through Wembley ? .. I suggest the Clive Mendonca Line or the Bobby Moore Line
    If the trains are having a shocker, it can be the naby line
  • It's not the renaming that's the problem. It's spending over £6 million to do it. 
    This. I couldn't care less about a name of a train line.

    i care about the money wasted on this which could have been invested in improving the rail network and actually making it run regularly and on time.
  • It's not the renaming that's the problem. It's spending over £6 million to do it. 
    This. I couldn't care less about a name of a train line.

    i care about the money wasted on 
  • I'm confused  ?  

    They say that these new names are for the "overground"....I take it they mean the overground part of the underground...yes ?

    I'm also assuming that there are no breaks in the line/service and the lines run continuously into the "underground" as before....yes ?

    If so....then why the need for change ? I know..... because of inclusivity, diversity and to be shown to be doing something "modern" and "out there". In reality its a total waste of £6m. The lines aren't changing and ultimately will just confuse more people that are "affected" by Windrush etc .


    I hope you genuinely haven't heard of the London Overground...
  • The thing with Sadiq Khan and the London Mayorship is that he could be there for decades given the bunch of complete no hopers that usually line up against him at election time .. God Help London 
  • £6.3 Million properly allocated could pay salaries for (say) 200 nurses, perhaps 150 junior doctors, 200 school teachers etc etc .. anyone who says that £6.3 Million is NOT A LOT OF MONEY is an illiterate idiot
    It's small when compared to billions lost elsewhere.

    Brunel line would be better IMO but he already (deservingly) has a museum and university named after him in London and other prestigious buildings around the country like a shopping centre in Swindon. Like Charlton can't name everything after Sam Bartram, Brunell can't claim all of the glory.
  • I'm confused  ?  

    They say that these new names are for the "overground"....I take it they mean the overground part of the underground...yes ?

    I'm also assuming that there are no breaks in the line/service and the lines run continuously into the "underground" as before....yes ?

    If so....then why the need for change ? I know..... because of inclusivity, diversity and to be shown to be doing something "modern" and "out there". In reality its a total waste of £6m. The lines aren't changing and ultimately will just confuse more people that are "affected" by Windrush etc .


    People claiming it's a waste of money, this shows how confused some people are on the overground. 
  • Bloody snowflakes offended by everything


  • Sponsored links:


  • The thing with Sadiq Khan and the London Mayorship is that he could be there for decades given the bunch of complete no hopers that usually line up against him at election time .. God Help London 

  • I'm confused  ?  

    They say that these new names are for the "overground"....I take it they mean the overground part of the underground...yes ?

    I'm also assuming that there are no breaks in the line/service and the lines run continuously into the "underground" as before....yes ?

    If so....then why the need for change ? I know..... because of inclusivity, diversity and to be shown to be doing something "modern" and "out there". In reality it’s a total waste of £6m. The lines aren't changing and ultimately will just confuse more people that are "affected" by Windrush etc .


    Overground is a totally different service to Underground.  
  • Plenty of illiterate people voted for Brexit despite the billions and billions of damage it has inflicted on the UK economy and was always predicted to inflict. Over £100bn and counting so far (30bn for London alone) which massively reduces government revenue, which could have paid for all your thousands of doctors and teachers.

    6.3m as a one off cost to TfL is nothing worth moaning about.
  • se9addick said:
    I'm confused  ?  

    They say that these new names are for the "overground"....I take it they mean the overground part of the underground...yes ?

    I'm also assuming that there are no breaks in the line/service and the lines run continuously into the "underground" as before....yes ?

    If so....then why the need for change ? I know..... because of inclusivity, diversity and to be shown to be doing something "modern" and "out there". In reality it’s a total waste of £6m. The lines aren't changing and ultimately will just confuse more people that are "affected" by Windrush etc .


    Overground is a totally different service to Underground.  
    Womberling free!
  • Rothko said:
    Rothko said:
    £6.3 Million properly allocated could pay salaries for (say) 200 nurses, perhaps 150 junior doctors, 200 school teachers etc etc .. anyone who says that £6.3 Million is NOT A LOT OF MONEY is an illiterate idiot
    You know it’s a different budget and different organisation, you’re not that thick?
    read the 'PROPERLY ALLOCATED' bit Rothicko .. 6.3 Million ridiculously allocated to this vanity nonsense instead of where it could do some good
    You been hanging out with fhe Lincolnshire hillbillies too much, TfL doesn’t received direct funding from central government, so it’s using TfL own fare revenue to fund this, as well as funding others big fat pay rises and the freeze on fares 
    read this .. Ministers and TfL agree £250 million government funding to upgrade London’s transport system - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) 
  • Chizz said:
    MrOneLung said:
    Dont know why the couldnt keep the generic Overground name, but just had the relevant sections in the colours they have just introduced
    You'd prefer there were one "overground" line, in six different colours? 
    well at the moment there is one 'overground' line covering all these lines and it is one colour, so why not ?

  • Jac_52 said:
    Plenty of illiterate people voted for Brexit despite the billions and billions of damage it has inflicted on the UK economy and was always predicted to inflict. Over £100bn and counting so far (30bn for London alone) which massively reduces government revenue, which could have paid for all your thousands of doctors and teachers.

    6.3m as a one off cost to TfL is nothing worth moaning about.
    Quite, TFL have a budget of £9bn, so this is about 0.07%. Some people need a bit of perspective but then I feel they will look for any reason to have a moan about the mayor even when they don't live in London. Bizarre. 
  • colthe3rd said:
    Jac_52 said:
    Plenty of illiterate people voted for Brexit despite the billions and billions of damage it has inflicted on the UK economy and was always predicted to inflict. Over £100bn and counting so far (30bn for London alone) which massively reduces government revenue, which could have paid for all your thousands of doctors and teachers.

    6.3m as a one off cost to TfL is nothing worth moaning about.
    Quite, TFL have a budget of £9bn, so this is about 0.07%. Some people need a bit of perspective but then I feel they will look for any reason to have a moan about the mayor even when they don't live in London. Bizarre. 
    another one who considers £6.3 Million to be just a drop in the bucket .. financial and social illiteracy
  • colthe3rd said:
    Jac_52 said:
    Plenty of illiterate people voted for Brexit despite the billions and billions of damage it has inflicted on the UK economy and was always predicted to inflict. Over £100bn and counting so far (30bn for London alone) which massively reduces government revenue, which could have paid for all your thousands of doctors and teachers.

    6.3m as a one off cost to TfL is nothing worth moaning about.
    Quite, TFL have a budget of £9bn, so this is about 0.07%. Some people need a bit of perspective but then I feel they will look for any reason to have a moan about the mayor even when they don't live in London. Bizarre. 
    another one who considers £6.3 Million to be just a drop in the bucket .. financial and social illiteracy
    Financial illiteracy? You might be shocked to know what my job is.

    I'm struggling with the social illiteracy though? Care to expand on that?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!