Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Online fan meeting with club directors - next one Thurs Jan 23rd 7pm (p8)

1161719212228

Comments

  • ....oh and sounded inetresteing re' buying assets, assuming what was said is correct
  • It’s becoming increasingly clear to me that our number one missive is to develop young players to then sell them 
    Which is exactly what Roland wanted when he took the club over, and probably the same for every other idiot that has taken us over since.
  • I really don’t want to criticise but I’ve honestly got nothing out of this.

    The questions from the Zoom reps were far too long winded and gave us nothing of interest (banner news - jeez).

    Why didn’t someone test out the microphone levels from Sparrows Lane? Someone should also have tested the zoom reps out and told them to turn off background noise etc.

    No one questioned the answers. Nathan was asked are we looking at adding more pace to the squad like TC and Small. The answer was about how well TC and Small have played without actually answering the question.

    The answer about the floodlights was basically that they were aware of it and it could be caused by a number of issues. That’s not an answer.

    Such a wasted opportunity.

    Also, is there a more unlikeable character than Rodwell? There’s something I really don’t like about him.

    I really want to be more positive but I feel really let down by the questions that were presented to them.
    They have had 3 weeks to try and resolve the issue with the floodlights. As you say there was no proper answer to the question. If Methven is saying its within the guidelines at present then fine, but if a couple more bulbs go in that North West corner before the problem is resolved then you have a issue on your hands re completing a fixture especially before the clocks go forward at the end of March
  • Hal1x said:
    Charlotte "can you let us know what turnstile is not working", well two things, surely they should already know, and if they really don't it would take one bloke with a season ticket card half an hour walking around the ground to find out.
    Too busy with the cyber attack it seems !
  • I'm not sure why everyone keeps asking them about buying The Valley, its not happening they have no interest in it, they will only want to buy it if we somehow fluke getting into the prem, even then I'm not even sure they would. Prob take their profits and run.
  • It’s becoming increasingly clear to me that our number one missive is to develop young players to then sell them 
    Think that’s quite obvious, and that we want to buy players to develop and sell. 

    I don’t really see the problem with this, they have already shown they aren’t going to accept the first offer for our young players and are doing better than previous regimes at getting them on contracts so that we get the maximum value for them

    If we develop our own players or buy and develop players that become good enough to make a profit on, then that means we are developing and signing good players and will be doing well 
  • edited January 23
    I think the intent of Heather's question was to gauge if the board are aware of the fans' views and issues. Unfortunately they were able sidestep it quite comfortably.
  • Chunes said:
    I think the intent of Heather's question was to gauge if the board are aware of the fans' views and issues. Unfortunately they were able sidestep it quite comfortably.
    Thing is the answer to that is easy. "We've set up the new structure so that we can hear directly from fans and we're really excited about it". Sounds like a win without saying anything
  • Sponsored links:


  • It’s becoming increasingly clear to me that our number one missive is to develop young players to then sell them 
    Which is exactly what Charlie was trying to do at Sunderland.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Alfie May just scored. 

    Ask why he wasn't deemed good enough 

    Dobson own goal from the reverse angle. May didn’t get a touch!
  • edited January 23
    Just for CoveredEnds benefit... Alfie May
  • Thought Methven was what he always is at these things , very slick PR answers that don't really ever fully answer the question he's asked. Gavin Carter is fine , it's clearly not his natural thing. 

    Rodwell I just can't put my finger on why I just can't trust anything he says. Feels like someone that clearly thinks highly of themselves but isn't actually good at their job. 
  • It’s becoming increasingly clear to me that our number one missive is to develop young players to then sell them 
    Nothing new there and with the money it costs to run the club it makes sense, as long as it's combined with genuine ambition for the first team and we see that through good progress on the pitch (not saying we are, but we will have done if we have a strong end to the season).
  • Wunch of bankers
  • I like how they kept using the fact we are in the middle of a transfer window as an excuse when it suited them (where Andy Scott is, why the SMT was fragmented on the day etc etc) but were completely evasive about us signing anyone - these things can't both be true at the same time can they????

    Also why do we always end up with SMTs who want to do things completely different to what the whole rest of the football league is doing and is tried and true? Like we have to trust that they know something the whole rest of the league doesn't!? Oh the loan market doesn't work for the small clubs - well why do they ALL do it thennnnn??? Oh we have had more bad loans than good ones? Well that says more about your shitty fucking scouting network than it does about the loan market.

    That whole thing was frustrating beyond belief and the sad thing is I knew that was what they were going to say going in and I still wasted my time watching it..


    The comments on loans are fkn ridiculous. Even the best clubs in the world utilise loans. 

    If you are afraid to splash cash, loans are what can save you.

    As for the concern about recalls if they do well, I don't understand the concern. If a player does well and is recalled, chances are they've made an impact/earned us points, and there should always be plans in place to replace said player with a like for like. These are proper basics in recruitment. 

    Again, well said 

    I've said on the transfer rumours thread last week that we wont be signing anyone significant & hence why I dont really post on there. Waste of time.

    As for loans......see my earlier comment. 

    I wonder how long it will take the yanks to realise they've been had & want to pull out. Another season maybe ?? Losing £10m a season (the figures said £9m but that was on the optimistic side) isnt sustainable for too much longer, esp when on the pitch we are being fed dross on a weekly basis. 


Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!