Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

EFL 24/25 scores and results

1810121314

Comments

  • edited September 17
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
  • West2003 said:
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
    I imagine the answer would be yes... We didnt win because we didnt score four that day, rather than because we let in three
  • I'll be interested to see how Birmingham get on with their next 4 games which are all "tough" by league one standards. If they get a decent points hull from their upcoming games we could see them start to pull away a bit. 
  • West2003 said:
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
    I imagine the answer would be yes... We didnt win because we didnt score four that day, rather than because we let in three
    Everyone knows 4-3 is a useless score though, you have to win by 2 goals for 3 points in League One 😉
  • West2003 said:
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
    My point is, keeping a clean sheet is not an issue if you can score 2 or 3 yourself, like Birmingham did last night. There is a big difference to just letting in 1 to letting in 3.....as well you know.

    It seems that people are obsessed with a  1-0 "clean sheet win" and with it winning "dirty" or "ugly"......whereas I would be happier playing attacking football where letting in a goal is not an issue because we are creating chances up the other end & likely to come out on top more often than not. 

    It is early days but the league table doesn't lie. There are 3 teams on 13 points but we are 3rd for a reason. So just ask yourself, would you rather win 1-0 every week & end up 3rd or 3-1 and end up top (or even 2-1 as if level on GD the table is based on goals scored and not goals conceded). 




  • West2003 said:
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
    My point is, keeping a clean sheet is not an issue if you can score 2 or 3 yourself, like Birmingham did last night. There is a big difference to just letting in 1 to letting in 3.....as well you know.

    It seems that people are obsessed with a  1-0 "clean sheet win" and with it winning "dirty" or "ugly"......whereas I would be happier playing attacking football where letting in a goal is not an issue because we are creating chances up the other end & likely to come out on top more often than not. 

    It is early days but the league table doesn't lie. There are 3 teams on 13 points but we are 3rd for a reason. So just ask yourself, would you rather win 1-0 every week & end up 3rd or 3-1 and end up top (or even 2-1 as if level on GD the table is based on goals scored and not goals conceded). 




    Maths isn’t my strong point but I’m pretty certain that if we won 1-0 every week we would finish 3rd mate

  • Wouldn’t 
  • Sponsored links:


  • sam3110 said:
    West2003 said:
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
    My point is, keeping a clean sheet is not an issue if you can score 2 or 3 yourself, like Birmingham did last night. There is a big difference to just letting in 1 to letting in 3.....as well you know.

    It seems that people are obsessed with a  1-0 "clean sheet win" and with it winning "dirty" or "ugly"......whereas I would be happier playing attacking football where letting in a goal is not an issue because we are creating chances up the other end & likely to come out on top more often than not. 

    It is early days but the league table doesn't lie. There are 3 teams on 13 points but we are 3rd for a reason. So just ask yourself, would you rather win 1-0 every week & end up 3rd or 3-1 and end up top (or even 2-1 as if level on GD the table is based on goals scored and not goals conceded). 




    Hahaha so we'd beat Birmingham and Wrexham 1-0 home and away but somehow not get more points than them?! 

    🤡🤡🤡
    Maybe the EFL have brought in bonus points like rugby and we haven’t noticed mate 😂 
  • If a side gets promoted from league 1 with Eoin O'Connell as a starter i'd be stunned.
    Always thought he was a cart horse .
    After watching last nights highlights nothing has changed.
  • I get the Hollywood hype around little Wrexham coming good, but Berminnum?  Do me a favour - falls as flat as their brummy accent.

    Not only that, but David Beckham sucking up to Tom Brady last night made me want to vomit.
    What, you weren't wondering about when David Beckham played at St Andrews? (as the commentator suggested the audience may be).
  • I'd say it's early doors for Birmingham still. Last season at this point I think Cambridge, Exeter and Stevenage were all near the top? 

    Playing at home will help them massively, they seem to have a good feel atm, and a lot of their fans seem quite happy they were relegated as they needed a reset. If two teams do manage to finish above them, it will be two very good sides. Hopefully one of them is us. 

    Their next 4 games will paint a picture of where they will end up I imagine. Rotherham (a), Peterborough (h), Huddersfield (h) and of course us at the Valley. 

    If they can get 9-10 points out of that lot, it will be some going. Curious to see how they get on against Peterborough, they are a good measure of where you stand in this league, proper gatekeeper team. 
  • I'd say it's early doors for Birmingham still. Last season at this point I think Cambridge, Exeter and Stevenage were all near the top? 

    Playing at home will help them massively, they seem to have a good feel atm, and a lot of their fans seem quite happy they were relegated as they needed a reset. If two teams do manage to finish above them, it will be two very good sides. Hopefully one of them is us. 

    Their next 4 games will paint a picture of where they will end up I imagine. Rotherham (a), Peterborough (h), Huddersfield (h) and of course us at the Valley. 

    If they can get 9-10 points out of that lot, it will be some going. Curious to see how they get on against Peterborough, they are a good measure of where you stand in this league, proper gatekeeper team. 
    I think Port Vale were near the top too, so early days. 
  • Literally nobody would prefer an ugly win over winning playing attacking football. 

    You’re now so obsessed with making the same point you’re making up arguments.
    I wouldn't care if it was 90+ minutes of turgid shite every week if it meant we got out of this poxy division this season.
  • The only thing that the 1st six games of the season shows is that Birmingham after spending tens of millions will in all probability romp away with the league. 
    Every other position is up for grabs and it's far too early to be making predictions. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • People are just arguing for the sake of arguing. Every one of us would be delighted with getting promoted edging out wins.

    It's clearly the case that Golfie and some others including myself are naturally pessimistic that we can't keep being lucky edging out wins. And the majority here that are naturally optimistic thinking we can keep these results going.

    End argument. 
  • I'd say it's early doors for Birmingham still. Last season at this point I think Cambridge, Exeter and Stevenage were all near the top? 

    Playing at home will help them massively, they seem to have a good feel atm, and a lot of their fans seem quite happy they were relegated as they needed a reset. If two teams do manage to finish above them, it will be two very good sides. Hopefully one of them is us. 

    Their next 4 games will paint a picture of where they will end up I imagine. Rotherham (a), Peterborough (h), Huddersfield (h) and of course us at the Valley. 

    If they can get 9-10 points out of that lot, it will be some going. Curious to see how they get on against Peterborough, they are a good measure of where you stand in this league, proper gatekeeper team. 
    There's a big difference though between smaller teams and newly promoted teams with great team spirit starting a season well, and a big team "buying the league". I imagine the bookies this time last year would still given longer odds on Cambridge or Exeter going up than Derby.

    Smaller teams with small squads can't cope with injuries and the grind of endless games, whereas Brum have the quality and depth. And presumably will spend more in January if necessary.
  • fenaddick said:


    Last year's top half after 6 games

    End of the season:
    Exeter - 13th
    Bolton - 3rd
    Stevenage - 9th
    Port Vale - 23rd (R)
    Portsmouth - 1st
    Cambridge United - 18th
    Oxford - 5th (P)
    Lincoln - 7th
    Barnsley - 6th
    Wigan - 12th
    Wycombe - 10th
    Derby - 2nd (P)
    Only 3 of the opening top 12 didn't finish in the top 12, so the start of the season wasn't a bad guide to the finishing places.

    Many of the clubs finished only 1 or 2 places different.
  • edited September 17
    West2003 said:
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
    My point is, keeping a clean sheet is not an issue if you can score 2 or 3 yourself, like Birmingham did last night. There is a big difference to just letting in 1 to letting in 3.....as well you know.

    It seems that people are obsessed with a  1-0 "clean sheet win" and with it winning "dirty" or "ugly"......whereas I would be happier playing attacking football where letting in a goal is not an issue because we are creating chances up the other end & likely to come out on top more often than not. 

    It is early days but the league table doesn't lie. There are 3 teams on 13 points but we are 3rd for a reason. So just ask yourself, would you rather win 1-0 every week & end up 3rd or 3-1 and end up top (or even 2-1 as if level on GD the table is based on goals scored and not goals conceded). 




    What I think everyone understands except you is that no team will win every week, whether it is 1-0 or 3-1.

    Everyone else understands that an aim of scoring 3 goals or more per game is for fools, because it won't happen.

    If you're right and everyone else is wrong then please tell me who was the last promoted team from League 1 that scored a minimum of 138 goals. (Good luck with that).

    Everyone would like attacking football, scoring lots of goals and winning all the games.

    Everyone except you realises that this does not and will not happen.

    Wake up, do some research and educate yourself into the fact that no one scores 138 goals per season.

    Apologies for being harsh, but everyone's comments are continually brushed aside.
    I don't doubt your research, agree that no team can score 3 goals every game. Totally agree to all that.

    My point is, and still stands, that Birmingham & Wrexham are above us, not because they have had clean sheet wins, but because when they do concede they manage to score at least 1 more than their opponents. On the 2 times we have conceded this season we have scored just once in reply and that got us a point. 

    If you think my logic is flawed then please explain why we, having kept 4 clean sheets, are not top  ???  We haven't lost more games than Wrexham.

    So. Keeping a clean sheet doesn't nevessaily win you the title. You can keep 46 clean sheets but if you dont score either then 46 0-0's might just keep you up. 


  • AndyG said:
    West2003 said:
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
    My point is, keeping a clean sheet is not an issue if you can score 2 or 3 yourself, like Birmingham did last night. There is a big difference to just letting in 1 to letting in 3.....as well you know.

    It seems that people are obsessed with a  1-0 "clean sheet win" and with it winning "dirty" or "ugly"......whereas I would be happier playing attacking football where letting in a goal is not an issue because we are creating chances up the other end & likely to come out on top more often than not. 

    It is early days but the league table doesn't lie. There are 3 teams on 13 points but we are 3rd for a reason. So just ask yourself, would you rather win 1-0 every week & end up 3rd or 3-1 and end up top (or even 2-1 as if level on GD the table is based on goals scored and not goals conceded). 




    Maths isn’t my strong point but I’m pretty certain that if we won 1-0 every week we would finish 3rd mate
    I'd be prepared to wage a bet, that we'd finish top, by a country mile. 
  • Only seen the highlights so not got a full reflection on the game, but Wrexham look a bang average side to me.

    Their keeper is meant to be good but every time I watch him he has a shocker
    They looked like a side that is used to a good run in lower leagues and are now finding out they are no longer the top dogs. I was disappointed and pleased with how they're not using Dobbo effectively. 
    Not seen any of it, what do you mean re Dobbo? 

    And whats your take on them subbing Alfie on 65?
  • edited September 17
    People are just arguing for the sake of arguing. Every one of us would be delighted with getting promoted edging out wins.

    It's clearly the case that Golfie and some others including myself are naturally pessimistic that we can't keep being lucky edging out wins. And the majority here that are naturally optimistic thinking we can keep these results going.

    End argument. 
    I don't think that's what the majority think.
    I'm not very confident that we can keep these results going to achieve promotion, although I do think we will be in with a play off chance.

    The "argument" is whether we should abandon our well organised defensive set up in search of scoring more goals, because it's better to win scoring 2 or 3 goals than 1 or 2 goals.

    The issue is that no team averages 3 goals per game, so it's a false argument.
    If we try and play an open game we will ship more goals.
    Generally teams that are higher scoring also concede more as well and as soon as the goals scored dry up (and they always do) then you're left with a porous defence.
  • edited September 17
    West2003 said:
    jakecafc said:
    It's been all Birmingham. They should run away with this league.
    Their front 2 have 6 goals between them. Wrexham have 2 players with 5 between them. 

    35 players have scored 2 or more goals across league 1. None of our players have scored more than once.

    We are now down to 3rd. The 3 teams directly below us are within 3 points and all have a game in hand.

    And I'm not being negative I'm.just stating facts.

    Oh......and by the way, Birmingham haven't kept a clean sheet tonight BUT ARE WINNING BECAUSE THEY HAVE SCORED 3 TIMES.



    YOU ARE SO NEGATIVE YOU THINK THAT THIS IS POSITIVE.
    Scoring 3 and conceding 1 is certainly better than scoring 1 & letting in 0.

    Simple maths. And the table is based on points & then Goal Difference. Not clean sheets. 

    Couldn't give a shit if we didnt keep another clean sheet between now & the end of the season as long as we scored 2 more than our opponents. 
    I ask this out of curiosity...

    Were you also saying this when we couldn’t keep out a Port Vale side that went on to be relegated when we drew 3-3 there as part of our own slide towards the League One relegation zone?
    My point is, keeping a clean sheet is not an issue if you can score 2 or 3 yourself, like Birmingham did last night. There is a big difference to just letting in 1 to letting in 3.....as well you know.

    It seems that people are obsessed with a  1-0 "clean sheet win" and with it winning "dirty" or "ugly"......whereas I would be happier playing attacking football where letting in a goal is not an issue because we are creating chances up the other end & likely to come out on top more often than not. 

    It is early days but the league table doesn't lie. There are 3 teams on 13 points but we are 3rd for a reason. So just ask yourself, would you rather win 1-0 every week & end up 3rd or 3-1 and end up top (or even 2-1 as if level on GD the table is based on goals scored and not goals conceded). 




    What I think everyone understands except you is that no team will win every week, whether it is 1-0 or 3-1.

    Everyone else understands that an aim of scoring 3 goals or more per game is for fools, because it won't happen.

    If you're right and everyone else is wrong then please tell me who was the last promoted team from League 1 that scored a minimum of 138 goals. (Good luck with that).

    Everyone would like attacking football, scoring lots of goals and winning all the games.

    Everyone except you realises that this does not and will not happen.

    Wake up, do some research and educate yourself into the fact that no one scores 138 goals per season.

    Apologies for being harsh, but everyone's comments are continually brushed aside.
    I don't doubt your research, agree that no team can score 3 goals every game. Totally agree to all that.

    My point is, and still stands, that Birmingham & Wrexham are above us, not because they have had clean sheet wins, but because when they do concede they manage to score at least 1 more than their opponents. On the 2 times we have conceded this season we have scored just once in reply and that got us a point. 

    If you think my logic is flawed then please explain why we, having kept 4 clean sheets, are not top  ???  We haven't lost more games than Wrexham.

    So. Keeping a clean sheet doesn't nevessaily win you the title. You can keep 46 clean sheets but if you dont score either then 46 0-0's might just keep you up. 


    So you want us to score 3 goals per game, but concede that it is not possible, which really should be the end of the discussion. However ....

    No one says that we will win the league by keeping clean sheets.
    You are again making a false argument.

    Yes 46 0-0's will get you relegated and so would 46 3-3s.

    Nearly everyone is saying that with our limited resources and lack of goal scorers (yes we sold May but that is done and we are dealing with the now) we will more likely be successful if we can keep clean sheets and become very hard to beat.

    Surely you can see that winning 1-0 is much more likely/achievable with our squad, than winning 3-1 or 3-2 every game (not just a few times a season)?

    If you think we can score 138 goals or more then please give us a breakdown of who will score the 138 goals ie Ahadme 30 etc.

    We aren't above Wrexham because we've only played 6  games.
    Please look at last year's table after 6 games and try and understand that the season is far from over until next May.
  • Apologies if this has already been discussed but this gave me another reason to want bad things to happen to Brum

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/videos/ce8vvr55j07o

    their CEO thinks the game should have been played in the States. 

    But it’s Gary Cook. The man who credits himself with signing Tal Ben Haim for Citeh :-) and that’s one of his lesser crimes over the years.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!