Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
England Cricket 2025
Comments
-
Not to worry though, they assure us it won't happen again...North Lower Neil said:Apparently the Snicko company are taking responsibility:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/articles/c0mpjw7g7nko
Amazing how all these issues seem to be benefitting the Aussies.0 -
This bowling attack cannot bowl consistent spells of pressure. Batsmen know if they are ever put under the pump it really won't be for long.
And what were we thinking bowling Jacks for as many overs as we did?
Never mind all that I suppose. We'll just smash them to bits when we have bat In hand.
McCullum showing the kind of tactical prowess akin to Karel Fraeye!0 -
I think they should suspend using "snicko". It has shown to be unreliable with "spikes" not matching audio. It was clear as day that Carey got a touch on that ball.....where else did the noise (and there "spike") come from ? Ball was nowhere near his pads or body.killerandflash said:England losing a review for a blatant error by the Snicko operator makes this even more ridiculous. At least we should have the review back.
Absolute joke.1 -
Looks like Fox have rolled there own tech on this, where Sky and others have got Hawkeye in to run the system properly0
-
He's suffering from 'I should still be captain itis'Addick Addict said:Rumours that Steve Smith is ill and is going to miss the Test. They've all come from Australians though by all accounts.0 -
How many was Carey on when he nicked it?0
-
70 odd but with a new batter at the other endkinveachyaddick said:How many was Carey on when he nicked it?0 -
As with VAR, the 'Snickogate' controversy shows that reliance on technology, the 'computer says no' syndrome is still far from satisfactory.
If memory serves this is not the first instance of 'snickoitis' in this series. Wasn't there an issue with a Crawley dismissal ? (or not lol)0 -
Jamie Smith.Lincsaddick said:As with VAR, the 'Snickogate' controversy shows that reliance on technology, the 'computer says no' syndrome is still far from satisfactory.
If memory serves this is not the first instance of 'snickoitis' in this series. Wasn't there an issue with a Crawley dismissal ? (or not lol)1 -
This one is human error though rather than just the frames not lining up. It should have been so obvious to spotLincsaddick said:As with VAR, the 'Snickogate' controversy shows that reliance on technology, the 'computer says no' syndrome is still far from satisfactory.
If memory serves this is not the first instance of 'snickoitis' in this series. Wasn't there an issue with a Crawley dismissal ? (or not lol)0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Latest betting:
Australia - 1.51 (66%)
England - 3.60 (28%)
Draw - 15.50 (6%)
0 -
what's the best option for extended (60min?) highlights? Found a couple of shorter 15min highlights packages...but can't seem to find anything more substantial.0
-
Couldn't find you an hour one but managed 32minsDubaiAddickted said:what's the best option for extended (60min?) highlights? Found a couple of shorter 15min highlights packages...but can't seem to find anything more substantial.
https://youtu.be/Rjc4ApHEU10?si=Ou6oREtzSwSQTikO 0 -
They were using TNT's "special" feed. The one that tells you what's happened in advance of the action.fenaddick said:
This one is human error though rather than just the frames not lining up. It should have been so obvious to spotLincsaddick said:As with VAR, the 'Snickogate' controversy shows that reliance on technology, the 'computer says no' syndrome is still far from satisfactory.
If memory serves this is not the first instance of 'snickoitis' in this series. Wasn't there an issue with a Crawley dismissal ? (or not lol)0








