Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Elon Musk
Comments
-
Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.11 -
There had been an extensive inquiry already, what it needs is to be fully implemented as the lady leading that inquiry has said this week.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.31 -
Exactly where I am. Talk all you like for years on end at absolutely obscene cost to the taxpayer, 'lessons will be learned' and all that guff, and it will make no difference at all until action is taken.ME14addick said:
There had been an extensive inquiry already, what it needs is to be fully implemented as the lady leading that inquiry has said this week.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.
6 -
Think you're safe to continue your support Red...👍Redmidland said:I've not read the thread, but if Musk had any involvement with our club, that's me done after 65 yrs of support. Success at any cost...not for me. The man is a nasty piece of work and despite his billions he's got that through nicking other people's ideas, for example Tesla and Space X. He's a dangerous rich man with the morals of a weasel!2 -
There is a shock jock that did the same about an individual in the Southport riots. Don't recall a clamour from the holy on here when he said that.ME14addick said:
He thought nothing about the safety of Jess Phillips who has campaigned all her life for the protection of women and girls.bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
His inflammatory words could incite others to do her harm.
He is a very dangerous man.
2 -
The inquiry was started 7 yrs ago. It cost £100m, the report was given to the previous Tory government over 2 yrs ago. They didn't implement one recommendation! Now the same people are jumping on the Musk bandwagon calling for another public inquiry!
Just get on and implement the recommendations as per the report given to Sunak!
Badenock and Chris Phip (sp) said fuck all about it until Musk opened his gob. I notice Farage has gone quiet on it as well since his best mate turned on him!21 -
bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
22 -
When you get a thread of this nature, it’s like the whole team comes out to play.
5 -
So if he was to know a certain someone who has made highly inappropriate and sexualised comments about very young women (including his own relatives), a certain someone who deliberately entered a room where teenage girls were undressed as they prepared for a beauty pageant... he'd hate this person yes? He'd find them disgusting.bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
He certainly wouldn't let's just say for the sake of argument throw his support behind such a person getting elected to a very powerful position... like the presidency, just for example.
Hypothetically obviously. Because actually he hates nonces of course.25 -
Not true. They’re both left. The NY Post is the right leaning one.Leroy Ambrose said:
It's CNN and the New York Times, ffs. They're about as close to unbiased and accurate as you could possibly get. One of them is left leaning, the other right.Dazzler21 said:
Fair challenges I don't read American news outlets.Leroy Ambrose said:
This again? The myth that absolutely refuses to die.Dazzler21 said:
No he's not. He has offered a lot to the world in terms of leading the charge (pun intended) on EV tech and also provides a lot to charities.seth plum said:If if you don’t use Pay Pal, have a Tesla motorcar, and have never been on Twitter, Musk is an irrelevance
He hasn't done anything in 'EV tech'. He bought Tesla from its founders, and used (and continues to use) government subsidies to run his business. The taxpayer of the US is funding Musk - Tesla LOSES money selling cars. This is how they make 'profit':
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/31/investing/tesla-profitability/index.html
And the only reason he donates to charities is for tax purposes - the same reason most billionaires do. he doesn't even do what's 'required' of him there, either:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/12/us/politics/musk-foundation-taxes-donations.html
How DO you get your news on current affairs? Twitter? Telegram?
Jesus Christ8 -
Sponsored links:
-
Got told tonight by a source (police) that some councils have been paying victims hush money. Wonder which councils that would be.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.3 -
ME14addick said:
There had been an extensive inquiry already, what it needs is to be fully implemented as the lady leading that inquiry has said this week.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.
That inquiry was neither extensive nor concerned with the specific phenomenon of 'grooming gangs' as it is often termed by way of attempting to hide the reality of what occurred. The report was on CSA, not GLCSE; the two are not the same. If you didn't realise that, fair enough. If you did, shame on you.ME14addick said:
There had been an extensive inquiry already, what it needs is to be fully implemented as the lady leading that inquiry has said this week.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.11 -
Its also been stated that a load of data is missing from that inquiry.bigstemarra said:ME14addick said:
There had been an extensive inquiry already, what it needs is to be fully implemented as the lady leading that inquiry has said this week.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.
That inquiry was neither extensive nor concerned with the specific phenomenon of 'grooming gangs' as it is often termed by way of attempting to hide the reality of what occurred. The report was on CSA, not GLCSE; the two are not the same. If you didn't realise that, fair enough. If you did, shame on you.ME14addick said:
There had been an extensive inquiry already, what it needs is to be fully implemented as the lady leading that inquiry has said this week.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.3 -
Jess Philips? The same Jess Philips who likened the Cologne NYE sexual assaults to a jolly night out on the piss in Birmingham Broad Street?ME14addick said:
He thought nothing about the safety of Jess Phillips who has campaigned all her life for the protection of women and girls.bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
His inflammatory words could incite others to do her harm.
He is a very dangerous man.
The same one that made the 'grooming' scandal all about herself and her feelings? The one who complained about abuse during the GE but refused to say where it was coming from because it was politically inconvenient, just like a proper inquiry would be.
She cares about no-one but herself. She is vile.12 -
If only there was cake involved.2
-
An extensive inquiry? Are you serious?ME14addick said:
There had been an extensive inquiry already, what it needs is to be fully implemented as the lady leading that inquiry has said this week.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.
The report essentially looked generally at organised sexual abuse networks and included the rape gangs as an aside. It was not specifically about the rape gang scandal at all, looked at only six areas that did not have major rape gangs (while an estimated fifty towns across England and Wales have been affected by them), only mentioned hotbeds of rape gang activity like Rotherham once, only mentioned Rochdale in reference to paedophile Lib Dem MP Cyril Smith, did not mention Telford at all —where an estimated 1,000 victims were raped and abused—and did not even recommend punishment for the authorities that failed our children.
Yup apart from all that, it was pretty extensive.
What are you afraid of that a proper, full extensive inquiry would reveal?5 -
They're out in force tonight!7
-
That's the thing about hush money. It really works until someone in the police blabs to someone who posts on a football forum.
#MoneyWellSpent14 -
First the internet connected everyone, and then it divided everyone.6
-
Sponsored links:
-
As a woman I abhor violence and exploitation, so why would I be worried what an inquiry might reveal.Fortune 82nd Minute said:
An extensive inquiry? Are you serious?ME14addick said:
There had been an extensive inquiry already, what it needs is to be fully implemented as the lady leading that inquiry has said this week.bigstemarra said:Sorry everyone, I didn't realise that cantersaddick said:
Clearly you don't even understand what 'cognitive dissonance' means, then.
the cognitive dissonance is strong with this one!bigstemarra said:Elon doesn't like nonces, or people who cover up for nonces, or people who enable nonces or people who do their utmost to ensure that the people who covered up for nonces don't get brought to justice for covering up for and enabling nonces.
A lot of people feel the same way and applaud the pressure that he has put on this (and the previous) cowardly, morally bankrupt Government to try and get them to stop putting the interests of nonces and their enablers above those of the victims.
Not many hereabouts, though, obviously.
And I apologise for assuming that the majority of commenters hereabouts did not support the calls for a comprehensive Public Enquiry (although it should actually be at the level of a Royal Commission) into arguably the most shameful episode of our modern history.
The report essentially looked generally at organised sexual abuse networks and included the rape gangs as an aside. It was not specifically about the rape gang scandal at all, looked at only six areas that did not have major rape gangs (while an estimated fifty towns across England and Wales have been affected by them), only mentioned hotbeds of rape gang activity like Rotherham once, only mentioned Rochdale in reference to paedophile Lib Dem MP Cyril Smith, did not mention Telford at all —where an estimated 1,000 victims were raped and abused—and did not even recommend punishment for the authorities that failed our children.
Yup apart from all that, it was pretty extensive.
What are you afraid of that a proper, full extensive inquiry would reveal?
Another long and very expensive inquiry would only delay the implementation of the recommendations already made.10 -
Dangerous rich man with the morals of a weasel. Sounds like Trump.Redmidland said:I've not read the thread, but if Musk had any involvement with our club, that's me done after 65 yrs of support. Success at any cost...not for me. The man is a nasty piece of work and despite his billions he's got that through nicking other people's ideas, for example Tesla and Space X. He's a dangerous rich man with the morals of a weasel!5 -
Being English, British news outlets. I didn't say they weren't valid. Simply that I don't read them.Leroy Ambrose said:
It's CNN and the New York Times, ffs. They're about as close to unbiased and accurate as you could possibly get. One of them is left leaning, the other right.Dazzler21 said:
Fair challenges I don't read American news outlets.Leroy Ambrose said:
This again? The myth that absolutely refuses to die.Dazzler21 said:
No he's not. He has offered a lot to the world in terms of leading the charge (pun intended) on EV tech and also provides a lot to charities.seth plum said:If if you don’t use Pay Pal, have a Tesla motorcar, and have never been on Twitter, Musk is an irrelevance
He hasn't done anything in 'EV tech'. He bought Tesla from its founders, and used (and continues to use) government subsidies to run his business. The taxpayer of the US is funding Musk - Tesla LOSES money selling cars. This is how they make 'profit':
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/31/investing/tesla-profitability/index.html
And the only reason he donates to charities is for tax purposes - the same reason most billionaires do. he doesn't even do what's 'required' of him there, either:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/12/us/politics/musk-foundation-taxes-donations.html
How DO you get your news on current affairs? Twitter? Telegram?
Jesus Christ
In fairness I rarely watch/read any news these days, it's all far too depressing.1 -
Big question here is ........ will this thread last the night?0
-
Totally agree, Trump and Musk what a dangerous combination they are!Blackheathen said:
Dangerous rich man with the morals of a weasel. Sounds like Trump.Redmidland said:I've not read the thread, but if Musk had any involvement with our club, that's me done after 65 yrs of support. Success at any cost...not for me. The man is a nasty piece of work and despite his billions he's got that through nicking other people's ideas, for example Tesla and Space X. He's a dangerous rich man with the morals of a weasel!3 -
I have to say, a random thread about a completely hypothetical and unfounded scenario of the richest man in the world buying Charlton Athletic which then descends into a political argument about who does and doesn't protect paedophiles is absolutely peak Charlton Life.10
-
Don't forget the school dinners, a vital element of this thread tooExiled_Addick said:I have to say, a random thread about a completely hypothetical and unfounded scenario of the richest man in the world buying Charlton Athletic which then descends into a political argument is absolutely peak Charlton Life.6 -
But in reality, how long will those two last before they fall out? Egomaniacs don't make good friends with other egomaniacs.Redmidland said:
Totally agree, Trump and Musk what a dangerous combination they are!Blackheathen said:
Dangerous rich man with the morals of a weasel. Sounds like Trump.Redmidland said:I've not read the thread, but if Musk had any involvement with our club, that's me done after 65 yrs of support. Success at any cost...not for me. The man is a nasty piece of work and despite his billions he's got that through nicking other people's ideas, for example Tesla and Space X. He's a dangerous rich man with the morals of a weasel!1 -
Exiled_Addick said:I have to say, a random thread about a completely hypothetical and unfounded scenario of the richest man in the world buying Charlton Athletic which then descends into a political argument about who does and doesn't protect paedophiles is absolutely peak Charlton Life.
7 -
Absolutely no chance given the way it's turned in the past hour or so.Off_it said:Big question here is ........ will this thread last the night?0
This discussion has been closed.
