Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

11241251271291302262

Comments

  • johnny73
    johnny73 Posts: 4,567
    We can further add:
    1, Please can we have copy of contract / salary structure for the CEO position.
    2, Please can we have an accurate breakdown of attendance during your ownership of the club. Etc.
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 7,897
    J BLOCK said:

    DOUCHER said:

    sammy391 said:

    sammy391 said:

    J BLOCK said:

    Also being mentioned that DD has highlighted “more than 30” areas of concern.

    Anyone ITK can confirm or deny?
    It was slightly more than 30 originally, but the lawyers have worked through them and two thirds have been addressed. I'm told there's nothing unusual in that number.
    So we’re looking at perhaps 10 or so problems , which may or may not put the kibosh on a deal this week
    It's not clear that any of them would be an obstacle. Some things just need you to go away and do something rather than simply explain.

    If you've ever bought a house, it's quite usual for the buyer's solicitor to ask for things from the seller - warranties for improvements, etc - that haven't been put on the table at the outset. A business is a lot more complicated, obviously, but I assume it's the same principle.
    So these problems should be something that the club will actively sort out in order for a deal to ether be completed or be completed quicker?

    By your analogy, I guess problems are effectively down to value versus actual state - for instance a buyer would pay say £1m for a larger well maintained car park but due diligence has found that there are potholes everywhere!?
    Exactly what's happening, which is why any claims it's a "non-story" are for the birds.
    So do we take it from that that the directors with an Interest have been contacted in order to fill some of the 'potholes'? and my source is indeed telling porkies? Be good to know as it may stave off a nervous breakdown for one or 2 on here as I dread to think what could happen if it does all turn out to be nonsense
    It's not nonsense though, we've established this plenty of times through plenty of posters and sources.
    If it doesn't happen it will be for various reasons but not because there isn't serious interest.
    Well I spent quite a bit of a long train journey on Friday on here trying to establish what the evidence was and it boiled down to not much from what I could make out
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,989

    #1 please can we have a copy of the warranty for the boiler for the undersoil heating
    #2 please can we see the safety inspection records clearing the tannoy system

    That sort of thing...?

    #3 Please can you lower the £50M asking price ?
  • Nug
    Nug Posts: 4,623
    DOUCHER said:

    J BLOCK said:

    DOUCHER said:

    sammy391 said:

    sammy391 said:

    J BLOCK said:

    Also being mentioned that DD has highlighted “more than 30” areas of concern.

    Anyone ITK can confirm or deny?
    It was slightly more than 30 originally, but the lawyers have worked through them and two thirds have been addressed. I'm told there's nothing unusual in that number.
    So we’re looking at perhaps 10 or so problems , which may or may not put the kibosh on a deal this week
    It's not clear that any of them would be an obstacle. Some things just need you to go away and do something rather than simply explain.

    If you've ever bought a house, it's quite usual for the buyer's solicitor to ask for things from the seller - warranties for improvements, etc - that haven't been put on the table at the outset. A business is a lot more complicated, obviously, but I assume it's the same principle.
    So these problems should be something that the club will actively sort out in order for a deal to ether be completed or be completed quicker?

    By your analogy, I guess problems are effectively down to value versus actual state - for instance a buyer would pay say £1m for a larger well maintained car park but due diligence has found that there are potholes everywhere!?
    Exactly what's happening, which is why any claims it's a "non-story" are for the birds.
    So do we take it from that that the directors with an Interest have been contacted in order to fill some of the 'potholes'? and my source is indeed telling porkies? Be good to know as it may stave off a nervous breakdown for one or 2 on here as I dread to think what could happen if it does all turn out to be nonsense
    It's not nonsense though, we've established this plenty of times through plenty of posters and sources.
    If it doesn't happen it will be for various reasons but not because there isn't serious interest.
    Well I spent quite a bit of a long train journey on Friday on here trying to establish what the evidence was and it boiled down to not much from what I could make out
    WUM
  • dickplumb
    dickplumb Posts: 4,835
    DOUCHER said:

    J BLOCK said:

    DOUCHER said:

    sammy391 said:

    sammy391 said:

    J BLOCK said:

    Also being mentioned that DD has highlighted “more than 30” areas of concern.

    Anyone ITK can confirm or deny?
    It was slightly more than 30 originally, but the lawyers have worked through them and two thirds have been addressed. I'm told there's nothing unusual in that number.
    So we’re looking at perhaps 10 or so problems , which may or may not put the kibosh on a deal this week
    It's not clear that any of them would be an obstacle. Some things just need you to go away and do something rather than simply explain.

    If you've ever bought a house, it's quite usual for the buyer's solicitor to ask for things from the seller - warranties for improvements, etc - that haven't been put on the table at the outset. A business is a lot more complicated, obviously, but I assume it's the same principle.
    So these problems should be something that the club will actively sort out in order for a deal to ether be completed or be completed quicker?

    By your analogy, I guess problems are effectively down to value versus actual state - for instance a buyer would pay say £1m for a larger well maintained car park but due diligence has found that there are potholes everywhere!?
    Exactly what's happening, which is why any claims it's a "non-story" are for the birds.
    So do we take it from that that the directors with an Interest have been contacted in order to fill some of the 'potholes'? and my source is indeed telling porkies? Be good to know as it may stave off a nervous breakdown for one or 2 on here as I dread to think what could happen if it does all turn out to be nonsense
    It's not nonsense though, we've established this plenty of times through plenty of posters and sources.
    If it doesn't happen it will be for various reasons but not because there isn't serious interest.
    Well I spent quite a bit of a long train journey on Friday on here trying to establish what the evidence was and it boiled down to not much from what I could make out
    But the evidence cannot be divulged on here.

  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,734
    edited November 2017
    DOUCHER said:

    sammy391 said:

    sammy391 said:

    J BLOCK said:

    Also being mentioned that DD has highlighted “more than 30” areas of concern.

    Anyone ITK can confirm or deny?
    It was slightly more than 30 originally, but the lawyers have worked through them and two thirds have been addressed. I'm told there's nothing unusual in that number.
    So we’re looking at perhaps 10 or so problems , which may or may not put the kibosh on a deal this week
    It's not clear that any of them would be an obstacle. Some things just need you to go away and do something rather than simply explain.

    If you've ever bought a house, it's quite usual for the buyer's solicitor to ask for things from the seller - warranties for improvements, etc - that haven't been put on the table at the outset. A business is a lot more complicated, obviously, but I assume it's the same principle.
    So these problems should be something that the club will actively sort out in order for a deal to ether be completed or be completed quicker?

    By your analogy, I guess problems are effectively down to value versus actual state - for instance a buyer would pay say £1m for a larger well maintained car park but due diligence has found that there are potholes everywhere!?
    Exactly what's happening, which is why any claims it's a "non-story" are for the birds.
    So do we take it from that that the directors with an Interest have been contacted in order to fill some of the 'potholes'? and my source is indeed telling porkies? Be good to know as it may stave off a nervous breakdown for one or 2 on here as I dread to think what could happen if it does all turn out to be nonsense
    It's not that.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948

    #1 please can we have a copy of the warranty for the boiler for the undersoil heating
    #2 please can we see the safety inspection records clearing the tannoy system

    That sort of thing...?

    #3 Please can you lower the £50M asking price ?

    #1 please can we have a copy of the warranty for the boiler for the undersoil heating
    #2 please can we see the safety inspection records clearing the tannoy system

    That sort of thing...?

    #3 Please can you lower the £50M asking price ?
    #4 It says on fixture and fittings that there's a sofa, please confirm that this is included?

    #5 Again, on the fixtures and fittings list, it says that there's just the one Morphy Richards deep fat chip fryer included, please confirm?
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    DOUCHER said:

    J BLOCK said:

    DOUCHER said:

    sammy391 said:

    sammy391 said:

    J BLOCK said:

    Also being mentioned that DD has highlighted “more than 30” areas of concern.

    Anyone ITK can confirm or deny?
    It was slightly more than 30 originally, but the lawyers have worked through them and two thirds have been addressed. I'm told there's nothing unusual in that number.
    So we’re looking at perhaps 10 or so problems , which may or may not put the kibosh on a deal this week
    It's not clear that any of them would be an obstacle. Some things just need you to go away and do something rather than simply explain.

    If you've ever bought a house, it's quite usual for the buyer's solicitor to ask for things from the seller - warranties for improvements, etc - that haven't been put on the table at the outset. A business is a lot more complicated, obviously, but I assume it's the same principle.
    So these problems should be something that the club will actively sort out in order for a deal to ether be completed or be completed quicker?

    By your analogy, I guess problems are effectively down to value versus actual state - for instance a buyer would pay say £1m for a larger well maintained car park but due diligence has found that there are potholes everywhere!?
    Exactly what's happening, which is why any claims it's a "non-story" are for the birds.
    So do we take it from that that the directors with an Interest have been contacted in order to fill some of the 'potholes'? and my source is indeed telling porkies? Be good to know as it may stave off a nervous breakdown for one or 2 on here as I dread to think what could happen if it does all turn out to be nonsense
    It's not nonsense though, we've established this plenty of times through plenty of posters and sources.
    If it doesn't happen it will be for various reasons but not because there isn't serious interest.
    Well I spent quite a bit of a long train journey on Friday on here trying to establish what the evidence was and it boiled down to not much from what I could make out
    You seem fairly dense.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,021

    #1 please can we have a copy of the warranty for the boiler for the undersoil heating
    #2 please can we see the safety inspection records clearing the tannoy system

    That sort of thing...?

    #3 Please can you lower the £50M asking price ?

    #1 please can we have a copy of the warranty for the boiler for the undersoil heating
    #2 please can we see the safety inspection records clearing the tannoy system

    That sort of thing...?

    #3 Please can you lower the £50M asking price ?
    #4 It says on fixture and fittings that there's a sofa, please confirm that this is included?

    #5 Again, on the fixtures and fittings list, it says that there's just the one Morphy Richards deep fat chip fryer included, please confirm?
    #6 Please confirm that since Mr Luzon departed there are no squatters at The Valley.

    #7 Please confirm that the laundry van really does double as an armoured personnel carrier.
  • Sponsored links:



  • KiwiValley
    KiwiValley Posts: 3,379

    77 new posts and not a sniff of a takeover!

    Saw the flying kiwis flag at the All Whites v Peru game...what's this flying kiwis thing about?
  • 77 new posts and not a sniff of a takeover!

    Saw the flying kiwis flag at the All Whites v Peru game...what's this flying kiwis thing about?
    This

    https://mobile.twitter.com/flyingkiwisfc
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,350
    T_C_E said:

    Meanwhile, the training ground ditch nears the English coastimage

    SHE EVEN GOT THE BLOODY COLOUR WRONG!!!!!

    GRRRR!!!!!
  • T_C_E
    T_C_E Posts: 16,418

    T_C_E said:

    Meanwhile, the training ground ditch nears the English coastimage

    SHE EVEN GOT THE BLOODY COLOUR WRONG!!!!!

    GRRRR!!!!!
    It's next years home kit colours, doh did I say that out loud. Sorry Kate, it was supposed to be our secret. ;)
  • T_C_E said:

    Meanwhile, the training ground ditch nears the English coastimage

    That’s Rolands dedicated high speed circuit so he watch all the games in HD
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    105 new posts - nothing of note to make me think more positively or negatively about the goings on.
  • Uboat
    Uboat Posts: 12,195
    Dazzler21 said:

    105 new posts - nothing of note to make me think more positively or negatively about the goings on.

    Really? That's now how I see it. Still feeling encouraged.
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,309
    Dazzler21 said:

    105 new posts - nothing of note to make me think more positively or negatively about the goings on.

    Think Airmans latest post can only be good news
  • Well this latest round of “updates” seems to point towards this leading to a conclusion well before January. One way or the other.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344

    Well this latest round of “updates” seems to point towards this leading to a conclusion well before January. One way or the other.

    I'm 50/50 as to whether Roland can successfully sell the club.
  • Sponsored links:



  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,995
    I still think it won’t happen until next Summer.
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,218
    stonemuse said:

    I still think it won’t happen until next Summer.

    That's what Robinson will be hoping for.
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    I have absolutely no doubt, 100%, that the club has been responding to questions that arrive from due diligence, moreover seeking to address issues that arise.
    Whether that means a deal can be done eventually remains to be seen, but the club have been involved in the buying/selling process, or at least the lead up to it, of that I am absolutely convinced.
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,046
    Addickted said:

    Has Keohane got rising damp and dry rot then?

    Wouldn't have to rise too high would it!! :wink:
  • 77 new posts and not a sniff of a takeover!

    Saw the flying kiwis flag at the All Whites v Peru game...what's this flying kiwis thing about?
    This

    https://mobile.twitter.com/flyingkiwisfc
    Funny must be my dyslexia but i always called you flyingwiki in my head.
  • #8 How much is an easyjet flight to Australia?, Austria? Turkey? Japan? Russia? etc and how many on the CAFC mailing list could afford it to protest if things go wrong

    #9 How much money is left in the protest account.

    #10 How much did you sell Kermy for? Can you confirm that? Sorry, could you put it in both numerical and words? Really? Are you sure? WHY?
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,909
    edited November 2017
    #11 Why is the pitch and under soil heating (not yet connected to a boiler) named after Yann Kermorgant?

    #12 Why are the shiny new seats named after Dale Stephens?

    #13 Why is the air conditioning in the West stand lounges named after Joe Gomez?

    #14 Why is the (as yet unbuilt) training ground named after Ademola Lookman?

    #15 Why are the (as yet unbuilt) new dugouts named after Ezri Konsa?
  • T_C_E
    T_C_E Posts: 16,418

    #11 Why is the pitch and under soil heating (not yet connected to a boiler) named after Yann Kermorgant?

    #12 Why are the shiny new seats named after Dale Stephens?

    #13 Why is the air conditioning in the West stand lounges named after Joe Gomez?

    #14 Why is the (as yet unbuilt) training ground named after Ademola Lookman?

    #15 Why are the (as yet unbuilt) new dugouts named after Ezri Konsa?

    14) "The Ade Lookman Trench"
  • Hex
    Hex Posts: 1,888
    DOUCHER said:

    sammy391 said:

    sammy391 said:

    J BLOCK said:

    Also being mentioned that DD has highlighted “more than 30” areas of concern.

    Anyone ITK can confirm or deny?
    It was slightly more than 30 originally, but the lawyers have worked through them and two thirds have been addressed. I'm told there's nothing unusual in that number.
    So we’re looking at perhaps 10 or so problems , which may or may not put the kibosh on a deal this week
    It's not clear that any of them would be an obstacle. Some things just need you to go away and do something rather than simply explain.

    If you've ever bought a house, it's quite usual for the buyer's solicitor to ask for things from the seller - warranties for improvements, etc - that haven't been put on the table at the outset. A business is a lot more complicated, obviously, but I assume it's the same principle.
    So these problems should be something that the club will actively sort out in order for a deal to ether be completed or be completed quicker?

    By your analogy, I guess problems are effectively down to value versus actual state - for instance a buyer would pay say £1m for a larger well maintained car park but due diligence has found that there are potholes everywhere!?
    Exactly what's happening, which is why any claims it's a "non-story" are for the birds.
    So do we take it from that that the directors with an Interest have been contacted in order to fill some of the 'potholes'? and my source is indeed telling porkies? Be good to know as it may stave off a nervous breakdown for one or 2 on here as I dread to think what could happen if it does all turn out to be nonsense
    So, what's the sound of someone taking back a whoooosh ?
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,805
    I understand it to be:

    HSOOOOHW
This discussion has been closed.