Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Surrey ccc
Comments
-
Surrey game due to restart at 8.300
-
73-1 off 50
-
90-1 off 60
-
105-1 off 8
Stirling has hit a 26 ball 50, and Simpson a 21 ball 50.0 -
I always did like MiddlesexThe_President said:105-1 off 8
Stirling has hit a 26 ball 50, and Simpson a 21 ball 50.1 -
123-2 off 9 ...93 needed from 110
-
Surrey off (raining) after 5 overs, and winning on D/L0
-
All on Middx now0
-
Surrey 60-00
-
Middx imploding the fuckers0
- Sponsored links:
-
Middx need 50 off 4 overs the fuckers0
-
Middlesex bottlers0
-
ive always hated Middx - the fukin useless c*nts1
-
why the fuck did Hampshire get rid of Danny Briggs ?0
-
Nice to get a win. Shame the scummy north London pricks couldn't help us out.
Plenty of missed opportunities/thrown away games this year which let us down. I think back to the Kent game at the Oval when we were in control of the run chase and threw it away. And the Kent game when the rain stopped a certain win. Also the Glamorgan game when Dernbachs captaincy seriously let us down.
We didn't get selection right from the start and messed around not playing Jack's (one of our best limited overs bats - and not trusting him as second spinner) playing Borthwick at 8 or VDB and not bowling him.
Having said all that there were some brilliant games and performances this year. Finch was brilliant as you would expect. Top run scorer in the competition playing 5 less games than Bell in second place. Maddinson was a good find as second overseas player. Jacks broke through at the end of the tournament. Pope was brilliant. Foakes and Burns had their best year in the format. Clarke has been exceptional with bat and Ball.
When you factor in that all of Finch Roy Maddinson Morkel Tom Sam and Pope were missing for much of the tournament I don't think we performed that badly. Slightly dissapoining thaybour bowling which eas our strongest suit ober the last 4 or so years wasnt up tonscratch in a number of games.0 -
Don’t forget your run rate is worth an extra point though guys and you can console yourselves with your one day cup performance.0
-
Won’t talk about the league.0
-
Yes we need to focus on the league. The one that matters. Where Kent aren't even in the same league. Literally!0
-
1 piss offMrOneLung said:Don’t forget your run rate is worth an extra point though guys and you can console yourselves with your one day cup performance.
2 sod off
3 would have been enough but for that no result at Canterbury.0 -
Burns (6) and Stoneman (14) have both fallen early in the County Championship game against Lancashire at The Oval (1.30pm start).
Currently 26-20 - Sponsored links:
-
Harinath c Vilas b Bailey 1
28-30 -
Foakes c Davies b Mennie 12
51-40 -
Finch c Bailey b Parkinson 43
108-50 -
110-5 at tea0
-
S Curran c Davies b Bailey 40
130-60 -
Clarke run out (Hameed) 15
154-70 -
Patel c Croft b Mennie 12
155-80 -
Dernbach c Davies b Parkinson 10
168-9
Scrap that, he's still in.0 -
Morkel c Mennie b Parkinson 23
211-90 -
Dernbach c Croft b Bailey 31
211 all out0