The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
A tool is useful, even if it's a spanner.Covered_End_Lad said:Danny Murphy is a tool.
0 -
Thats good then, least he can point them in the right direction!i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Sounds like the Crystal Maze ffsRedmidland said:JW just said talks in next 12 hours and that may unlock the money to do the deal.
0 -
To what end, @carly burn ?carly burn said:
I'm just making a considered opinion on what the bloke just said which was pretty much nothing.SoundAsa£ said:
Oh....you know that do you?carly burn said:
Mate. He knows pretty much f*** all.Redmidland said:FWiW I think JW knows more than he is letting on or able to say. However to nail down the "next 12 hours" to me means talks sometime this evening?
Just like the rest of us
Pure speculation on your part.
It very much sounds to me like he's been sold a pup.
This whole bloody thread is pure speculation.
0 -
Christophe Lepoint?king addick said:
Thats good then, least he can point them in the right direction!i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Sounds like the Crystal Maze ffsRedmidland said:JW just said talks in next 12 hours and that may unlock the money to do the deal.
3 -
Skipped a lot of pages, why is Danny Murphy getting pelters?0
-
There's a lot of pure speculation on this thread. Loads more in the past 4 days, some of it made up from person or persons showing how rumours become speculation and maybe fact.SoundAsa£ said:
Oh....you know that do you?carly burn said:
Mate. He knows pretty much f*** all.Redmidland said:FWiW I think JW knows more than he is letting on or able to say. However to nail down the "next 12 hours" to me means talks sometime this evening?
Just like the rest of us
Pure speculation on your part.
I would err towards Carly speculation. We've had months of knowing the same stuff as everyone else and this latest rumour, (although my heart wants it), I feel it is just regurgitated speculation.
I long for the day when we can once again speculate on what quality players we will bring in for a push for Europe. Not that happened more than once in the old Netaddicks days.
0 -
Shelvey in a leopard skinking addick said:
Thats good then, least he can point them in the right direction!i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Sounds like the Crystal Maze ffsRedmidland said:JW just said talks in next 12 hours and that may unlock the money to do the deal.
0 -
Great, that should cheers us all up!i_b_b_o_r_g said:
Sounds like the Crystal MethRedmidland said:JW just said talks in next 12 hours and that may unlock the money to do the deal.
0 -
Mainly because he said Katrien spoke well I believe.Mendonca In Asdas said:Skipped a lot of pages, why is Danny Murphy getting pelters?
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Because he's the new ownerMendonca In Asdas said:Skipped a lot of pages, why is Danny Murphy getting pelters?
8 -
Sounds like crystal meth0
-
...
0 -
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.0 -
how does that work? American company buy the ground and training facilities and aussie company buy the club?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.0 -
Back off as in allow the aussies the day to day running or back off as in be seeing you?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.1 -
Sounds like it to me.kentaddick said:
how does that work? American company buy the ground and training facilities and aussie company buy the club?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.0 -
We've been here before. Duchatelets found a new mouthpiece.Chizz said:
To what end, @carly burn ?carly burn said:
I'm just making a considered opinion on what the bloke just said which was pretty much nothing.SoundAsa£ said:
Oh....you know that do you?carly burn said:
Mate. He knows pretty much f*** all.Redmidland said:FWiW I think JW knows more than he is letting on or able to say. However to nail down the "next 12 hours" to me means talks sometime this evening?
Just like the rest of us
Pure speculation on your part.
It very much sounds to me like he's been sold a pup.
This whole bloody thread is pure speculation.
Poor Jim just doesn't know it.0 -
This doesn't sound good. The Americans to own the appreciating assets and the Aussies to own the loss making "assets".Airman Brown said:
Sounds like it to me.kentaddick said:
how does that work? American company buy the ground and training facilities and aussie company buy the club?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.11 -
Doesn't sound ideal... and feeds into the idea the aussies either couldn't afford or wouldn't pay the price for the valley and sparrows lane. Also makes me wonder what the americans would get out the deal?Airman Brown said:
Sounds like it to me.kentaddick said:
how does that work? American company buy the ground and training facilities and aussie company buy the club?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.0 - Sponsored links:
-
So the Americans are now “out”0
-
So if the Americans are backing off, where does that leave the takeover?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.0 -
So you potentially have a messy split within the consortium? i.e. Bolton.Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.
What could possibly go wrong?kentaddick said:
how does that work? American company buy the ground and training facilities and aussie company buy the club?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.5 -
I don’t think it stacks up because of RD’s valuation.Scoham said:
So if the Americans are backing off, where does that leave the takeover?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.0 -
How many people have now pulled out of the Australian consortium? In the event that they are successful in taking over the club I would be worried that another Kevin Cash situation could unfold. Seems to be a number of individuals interested one minute only to back off at a later stage.Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.2 -
Dead in the water?Scoham said:
So if the Americans are backing off, where does that leave the takeover?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.
1 -
Hang on, it's off now?Airman Brown said:
I don’t think it stacks up because of RD’s valuation.Scoham said:
So if the Americans are backing off, where does that leave the takeover?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.
WTF0 -
Americans get the land in London which will appreciate in value, with little to no risk.kentaddick said:
Doesn't sound ideal... and feeds into the idea the aussies either couldn't afford or wouldn't pay the price for the valley and sparrows lane. Also makes me wonder what the americans would get out the deal?Airman Brown said:
Sounds like it to me.kentaddick said:
how does that work? American company buy the ground and training facilities and aussie company buy the club?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.
I know they can't develop it, but it's still an increasing asset, in the same way a valuable painting increases in value, without doing anything to it.0 -
which makes me quite worried. It's removing an appreciating asset from the club. Not good whatever way you want to spin it.Covered End said:
Americans get the land in London which will appreciate in value, with little to no risk.kentaddick said:
Doesn't sound ideal... and feeds into the idea the aussies either couldn't afford or wouldn't pay the price for the valley and sparrows lane. Also makes me wonder what the americans would get out the deal?Airman Brown said:
Sounds like it to me.kentaddick said:
how does that work? American company buy the ground and training facilities and aussie company buy the club?Airman Brown said:
American money, based on holding the assets. Australian control, based on owning the football club. However, the same source says the Americans will now back off.carly burn said:Australian consortium according to JW.
Doesn't that contradict what Airman said the other day?
This isn’t via JW, by the way.
I know they can't develop it, but it's still an increasing asset, in the same way a valuable painting increases in value, without doing anything to it.1 -
Were they ever in?ShootersHillGuru said:So the Americans are now “out”
3
