Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Kent CCC 2019
Comments
-
163-6
D B-D 61* the rest are laying down and dying.0 -
Kent need 173 runs to win165-for 6 wickets
0 -
A typical fourth innings procession from Kent.
Wander to the middle, say hello to everyone ... and a few balls later say cheerio. Next!0 -
188-for 6 wickets
Tea - Kent need 150 runs to win
0 -
Tea: 188-6 DBD 67*, Stevo 19*
Stevo played out the last two balls before the interval .. 4 followed by 6.
150 needed to win off a minimum 30 overs.
Stevo's probably thinking "hey guys, we can still win this ..."0 -
Kent all out 224 lost by 113 runs.
D B-D 810 -
Harmer got 8/98, can't argue with that0
-
Someone I know (!) said to me at the weekend the reason Kent will go down is because in this league you can’t have Joe Denly as your best spinner...
but there again he didn't know only only one team is relegated this season. Essex muppet.3 -
MrOneLung said:Someone I know (!) said to me at the weekend the reason Kent will go down is because in this league you can’t have Joe Denly as your best spinner...
but there again he didn't know only only one team is relegated this season. Essex muppet.1 -
I wish I was joking but he genuinely didn’t know only one down this season !2
- Sponsored links:
-
No idea why we picked Qayyum for this match, he's at best an average white ball spinner0
-
Warks beating Surrey is funny, but a draw would probably have been better for us, seeing that Warks will almost certainly be relegation rivals0
-
killerandflash said:No idea why we picked Qayyum for this match, he's at best an average white ball spinner
Do they think Qayyum is more of a wicket taker or do they just want the variety of a left armer?
0 -
LenGlover said:killerandflash said:No idea why we picked Qayyum for this match, he's at best an average white ball spinner
Do they think Qayyum is more of a wicket taker or do they just want the variety of a left armer?1 -
killerandflash said:LenGlover said:killerandflash said:No idea why we picked Qayyum for this match, he's at best an average white ball spinner
Do they think Qayyum is more of a wicket taker or do they just want the variety of a left armer?0 -
killerandflash said:LenGlover said:killerandflash said:No idea why we picked Qayyum for this match, he's at best an average white ball spinner
Do they think Qayyum is more of a wicket taker or do they just want the variety of a left armer?
Riles was never in the 13 man squad. He phoned me on Monday and was perfectly sober. Albeit is was in the evening!0 -
https://www.kentcricket.co.uk/news/viljoen-returns-for-vitality-blast/
Hardus Viljoen returns for the Blast. I'd forgotten about him, but he played for us briefly in 2016
1 -
I see Surrey have lost again - the Surrey thread seems curiously quiet this season
Warks and Notts heading for a draw, strange performance by Notts, 97 all out in the 1st innings, 247-3 in the second3 -
killerandflash said:I see Surrey have lost again - the Surrey thread seems curiously quiet this season
Warks and Notts heading for a draw, strange performance by Notts, 97 all out in the 1st innings, 247-3 in the second0 -
Spinner Ollie Raynor joining us on loan from Middlesex.1
- Sponsored links:
-
bolloxbolder said:Spinner Ollie Raynor joining us on loan from Middlesex.
Weird how Kent are so good at producing batters and keepers but not bowlers.0 -
After no play yesterday, Somerset not surprisingly put Kent in today. Grant Stewart returns
0 -
10-2
bring on the rain.0 -
That Somerset attack looks fearsome. Overton, Overton, Gregory, Brooks, Leach0
-
27-30
-
45-40
-
I'm saying nothing.
( Too busy dancing...)0 -
Oh blimey!0
-
45-50
-
killerandflash said:That Somerset attack looks fearsome. Overton, Overton, Gregory, Brooks, Leach2