Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…2728303233…175

Comments

  • peterreeves
    peterreeves Posts: 1,062
    This is the Sheiks doing... Fecking idiot playing games and we are going to lose this because he's allowed this to happen.

    We need a miracle to turn this over! 
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,031
    roseandcrown said:
    He is a boring fucker 
    So are you.
  • letthegoodtimesroll
    letthegoodtimesroll Posts: 10,617
    swords_alive said:
    Chaisty: Elliott put "hundreds of thousands of pounds" into the club to keep it afloat.
    Don’t they have an exact figure ?
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,989
    KBslittlesis said:
    Indianaaddick said:
    Judge has just put a black cap on top of his wig what does this mean?.
    Not in the least bit funny
    The existence of the club is in the balance and people are cracking jokes.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,842
    The wibbling on here is worse than on match threads when we're being written off as useless after 20 minutes!
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    se9addick said:
    charlton_hero said:
    Fingers crossed this is ended today and won't drag on any longer.
    I highly doubt it.

    My total, uninformed, laymen’s guess is that the judge will grant the injunction until the outcome of Elliott’s appeal against failing the EFL OADT. 
    I’m going to stick by my earlier prediction. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Todds_right_hook said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    If defendant is now arguing that there was a requirement for the EFL approval to be in place at completion then Nimer had no business allowing Elliott put money into the club subsequently, says Chaisty.
    Or Elliot shouldn’t have put money in
    Imagine thats going to be something that LK will be bringing straight up
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,454
    They have an agreement from May, and we've got to September without them buying, yet they would have us believe the sale wasn't conditional on EFL approval. So what the hell is the hold up? The agreement should clearly have had a time limit, but Elliot(t) is going to have to work very hard to convince the judge he has suffered harm when he couldn't pull his finger out and get the purchased completed within 4 months. Elliot(t)'s lawyer is litterally arguing that there is no reason for the hold up other than Elliot(t) no being bothered to get it done, and now upset that somebody else is willing to get it done.
  • NorthheathAddick
    NorthheathAddick Posts: 4,017
    Cmon LK let’s pull this out of the bag...🙌🤞🏻
  • flyingkiwiDK
    flyingkiwiDK Posts: 5,722
    MattF said:
    Only heard one side of it
    Who's going to be presenting the other side? Mihail?
  • Sponsored links:



  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,602
    letthegoodtimesroll said:
    swords_alive said:
    Chaisty: Elliott put "hundreds of thousands of pounds" into the club to keep it afloat.
    Don’t they have an exact figure ?
    Do they have proof?
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    golfaddick said:
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    If defendant is now arguing that there was a requirement for the EFL approval to be in place at completion then Nimer had no business allowing Elliott put money into the club subsequently, says Chaisty.
    Turn that on it's head - Elliott had no business putting money in then?
    yep. His lawyer is trying to blame Nimer for letting PE put money in when he knew he didnt own it 
    Got faith in LK.

    0-0

    COYR!
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    The only thing that Elliot has is the money thing... however, if I put money into a bank account that isn’t owned by me, then what right do I have to that money? 
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,997
    Definitely delaying tactics being used here ... I believe the judge will see through this and not allow it ... still expect a decision in favour of ESI1 today 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    stonemuse said:
    Definitely delaying tactics being used here ... I believe the judge will see through this and not allow it ... still expect a decision in favour of ESI1 today 
    Hmm not so sure...
  • IdleHans
    IdleHans Posts: 10,961
    If the club was sold back in June then it would have been elliott's responsibility to update companies house. Why hasnt he done that?
  • Gary Poole
    Gary Poole Posts: 1,874
    My guess is judge will not grant injunction, but will direct that there is nothing to stop Elliot pursuing TN / Panorama Magic / ESI through the courts to recover any money put in and any costs / damages.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,347
    How long would a trial take!? Bloody hell...
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 11,983
    kentaddick said:
    The only thing that Elliot has is the money thing... however, if I put money into a bank account that isn’t owned by me, then what right do I have to that money? 
    And, by the sounds of it, paper work to say Elliott owns the club 
  • Sponsored links:



  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    A letter from Mihail clearly stating the shares held by Al Nasirat and panorama have been sold to Elliott. June 8th
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    Chaisty is doing nothing but waffling, going backwards and forwards into Panoramas skeletal defence with no real sense of purpose.

    Not sure he's prepared that seriously.

    Lk is chomping at the bit to respond.
  • WRICURKINCAM
    WRICURKINCAM Posts: 327
    ValleyGary said:
    How has this amazing football club ended up in this shit. Fucking scum.
    EFL, that's how. That and Footba££.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,624
    randy andy said:
    They have an agreement from May, and we've got to September without them buying, yet they would have us believe the sale wasn't conditional on EFL approval. So what the hell is the hold up? The agreement should clearly have had a time limit, but Elliot(t) is going to have to work very hard to convince the judge he has suffered harm when he couldn't pull his finger out and get the purchased completed within 4 months. Elliot(t)'s lawyer is litterally arguing that there is no reason for the hold up other than Elliot(t) no being bothered to get it done, and now upset that somebody else is willing to get it done.
    Farnell has said many times that the purchase was on condition on PE passing the EFL tests. 
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Fair enough let it go to trial as Nimer v Elliott but hopefully the judge will see that as a separate issue and allow the sale of the club which is ultimately all we care about
  • PeanutsMolloy
    PeanutsMolloy Posts: 6,705
    MM's scored more own goals that Stewart Balmer.

  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,046
    Chaisty saying that letter on Charlton headed paper to Mr Craig at the EFL states that Nimer sold to Elliott...he doesn't point out who penned that letter.  Farnell?  Acting for Elliott instead of Nimer/CAFC?
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Chaisty referencing documentation that shows Mihail - acting on behalf of Nimer - on June 8 had supplied confirmation on club headed notepaper that Panorama had sold their shares to Elliott.
  • BR7_addick
    BR7_addick Posts: 10,210
    Gary Poole said:
    My guess is judge will not grant injunction, but will direct that there is nothing to stop Elliot pursuing TN / Panorama Magic / ESI through the courts to recover any money put in and any costs / damages.
    This! Exactly what I want and think will happen.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,304
    Chaisty argues that the EFL letter doesn’t say that Elliott deliberately misled them over conditionality.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”