Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…3334363839…175

Comments

  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 9,750
    meldrew66 said:
    Rossman92 said:
    Jesus don't know why I bother with Twitter. Everyone on there is already acting like the club is gone....... A lot of people don't seem to realize that both sides get to speak in a situation like this

    hopefully...………………..eventually...…………….
    Do you believe it?
  • hudson-son-son
    hudson-son-son Posts: 2,645
    When does Elliot have to put on the glove?
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,885
    edited September 2020
    meldrew66 said:
    RedChaser said:
    Our Barrister is s Charlton fan and a lot closer to the club than anyone in that courtroom and will be giving it her best shot don't you worry #teamLauren keep the faith 😘xxx

    However, this a contract law matter, not an emotive, passionate fan-related motion.
    Oh I'm well aware of that but she'll still be giving it her best shot.
  • SouthWest_Addicks
    SouthWest_Addicks Posts: 6,307
    Will we find out who owns the Range Rovers at the end on this (as well as the football club)? 
  • Jints
    Jints Posts: 3,491
    robinofottershaw said:
    Jints said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Chaisty turning to "adequacy of damages" - damages would not be adequate.

    "We will not have the share. It would make it a complete nonsense to have a trial when the shares have already gone."
    Don't understand this unless he is saying that damages not adequate remedy because no way of securing payment against a shell company. 
    You got it. That was the point he was making. What was unsaid of course was that Elliott would like to make a profit on selling on to TS rather than Nimer doing that.
    That could be dealt with by the proceeds of the sale being paid into court pending resolution of the contract issue. 
  • Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch
    Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch Posts: 1,785
    CAFCsayer said:
    Probably blind optimism, but reckon LK has something up her sleeve here... Kept smirking throughout that last bit
    Agree - doesn't seem too concerned.
  • Fumbluff
    Fumbluff Posts: 10,126
    Blimey he drones on...... Good Luck Lauren, I’m out 👍🏻
  • NorthheathAddick
    NorthheathAddick Posts: 4,017
    Is anyone else sitting there fidgeting,rocking bak & forth,whilst biting there fingernails...n I keep having to go for a pee...my nerves are shot...🥺
  • meldrew66
    meldrew66 Posts: 2,561
    RedChaser said:
    meldrew66 said:
    RedChaser said:
    Our Barrister is s Charlton fan and a lot closer to the club than anyone in that courtroom and will be giving it her best shot don't you worry #teamLauren keep the faith 😘xxx

    However, this a contract law matter, not an emotive, passionate fan-related motion.
    Oh I'm well aware of that but she'll stillbe giving it her best shot.

    Indeed. I just hope she can PROVE that there is no case to answer.
  • Sponsored links:



  • robinofottershaw
    robinofottershaw Posts: 1,921

    Can’t tell how confident Lauren is feeling. She smiles at many of the points Chaisty has made but maybe that is her game face.
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 11,983
    killerandflash said:
    One like for my reply. From Thomas Sandgaard. He's not going anywhere



    Yeah but what’s to say Elliot has the same idea of value as Roland and ask for £300m for the club?
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,625
    Callumcafc said:
    How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
    if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.

    If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    Makes no difference to TS I'm sure. He either pays Elliott or pays Nimer. 
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,458
    I've forgotten what they're even arguing about now.
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,285
    i've lost Lauren and the judge. Is this everybody? or have I done something? 
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,763
    Chaisty says he's almost finished. LK smiles again.
  • micks1950
    micks1950 Posts: 943
    Athletico Charlton said:
    Chaisty is really stringing out his hourly rate here.  References to how many are on line, what a bore.  Just give the facts in short, sharp, summary.  He doth protest too much me thinks.
    He's probably deliberately filibustering - to use up time.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    CAFCsayer said:
    Probably blind optimism, but reckon LK has something up her sleeve here... Kept smirking throughout that last bit
    Me an all mate
  • Sponsored links:



  • PeanutsMolloy
    PeanutsMolloy Posts: 6,705
    Chaisty doth protesteth about MM's skeleton response too much IMHO.
    Sure PE has a case and MM has fucked up a lot, giving ammunition to Elliottttt's brief, but this laborious, repetitive and sneering picking apart of MM's response smacks of throwing the kitchen sink at it and trying to over-egg a valid but far from a slam-dunk argument.
    Sock it to him LK.

  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,763
    cafcfan1990 said:
    Makes no difference to TS I'm sure. He either pays Elliott or pays Nimer. 
    Depends. If Nimer is asking for 500k and Elliott is asking for 5m it makes a difference.
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,000
    It sounds like Chaisty has got two or three decently strong arguments but hopes by saying each in five slightly different ways it will sound more impressive 
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651
    RedChaser said:
    Our Barrister is a Charlton fan and a lot closer to the club than anyone in that courtroom and will be giving it her best shot don't you worry #teamLauren keep the faith 😘xxx
    Sutton Utd v Coventry City 1989
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    If she can explain that Elliott has been offered his money back and compensation, and get it in the judges  mind they he ain't got any money to take the Club forward, won't that help show that he must have an alterior motive for wanting to own the Club?
  • JoshrewCAFC
    JoshrewCAFC Posts: 916
    edited September 2020
    . 
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,034
    meldrew66 said:
    There is one single, simple decision for the judge: Is there (yes or no) a legally binding agreement for ESI to buy the club from Panorama Magic?
    I don’t think that’s true - I think the judge needs to decide whether there is sufficient evidence that the ownership is in doubt to grant an injunction pending a full trial to examine this properly. 

    Could be wrong.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,763
    golfaddick said:
    Callumcafc said:
    How long is this bloke allowed to chat for while effectively making the same three or four points repeatedly? Bloody hell...
    if he is doing that then he knows he hasn't got anything of substance to go on.

    If PE had a cast iron, watertight contract, with no conditions on it then Chaisty would have said that straight away & then sat down. Case closed. He didnt & has been waffling on because he knows PE hasnt a case.
    Hope you're right.

    Anxious to hear LK's argument now.
  • NorthheathAddick
    NorthheathAddick Posts: 4,017
    If LK wins this for us...we should name one of the Dug outs after her...ie-: sitting on the LK bench
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    hudson-son-son said:
    When does Elliot have to put on the glove?
    When @ElfsborgAddick it’s about to pop his poo cherry.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”