Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Noticed LK turned her mic off whilst he was speaking but he hasn't done the sameChunes said:
It looks like he's trying to be as distracting as possible to meroseandcrown said:boring fucker looks uncomfortable5 -
Kreamer also says the £1 - which Lex Dominus were going to pay for the football club - has not been paid.55
-
She is quoting FAR more actual legal points and isnt waffling
24 -
Oh stop Lauren, please... He's already dead!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣17
-
Transfer form for shares not executed, £1 not paid and evidence of EFL approval needed on completion date, none of which was provided.
4 -
Never carry change these days, always an issueForeverAddickted said:Kreamer also says the £1 - which Lex Dominus were going to pay for the football club - has not been paid.9 -
24
-
.1
-
Hope he's not accused of a conflict of interest!MuttleyCAFC said:Helpful it is the same judge I suppose.
4 -
Some serious substance to this argument whereas the boring fart repeated the same thing for 90 minutes3
- Sponsored links:
-
15
-
I wonder if these latest comments are why Sandgaard wasnt worried...3
-
Kreamer: EFL says what Elliott has done is provided misleading information to it, which is the material point in its OADT process.
1 -
good0
-
Very significant point worth repeating;Kreamer says the deal was never completed Says Lex Dominus is yet to actually pay the £1!
0 -
Can't Chastities corner throw the towel in to save him from further punishment 😈ForeverAddickted said:Oh stop Lauren, please... He's already dead!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣5 -
If true that torpedoes their whole case. And raises the question of Elliotttt having thousands of pounds for wages but can't find a quid to seal the deal??ForeverAddickted said:Kreamer also says the £1 - which Lex Dominus were going to pay for the football club - has not been paid.4 -
Kreamer now discussing OADT test.
Says Elliott and Farnell both the subject of disqualifying conditions.
Kreamer claims EFL said Elliott provided "misleading information".
5 -
Oi Chaisty.
Preparation, preparation, preparation.
And doesn't mean an orange highlighting pen and a few notes in the paragraph.
And this bloke is a QC?1 -
Panorama Magic take a 2nd half lead.15
- Sponsored links:
-
Said it before the case... Doesnt matter how good and experienced your QC is if you dont have the evidence to backup your caseRedChaser said:
Can't Chastities corner throw the towel in to save him from further punishment 😈ForeverAddickted said:Oh stop Lauren, please... He's already dead!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣16 -
Chaisty might want to fall back a bit like Roland and try to claim how Charlton fans are against women being in certain roles
Oh hang on wait...3 -
It proves that does not matter how long you talk for, it's what you say that matters9
-
#ThisCaseMattersForeverAddickted said:1 -
Kreamer: "These are sanctions of the very most serious nature and wide-reaching. The regulations refer to disciplinary proceedings. It's not overstating it - and Panorama reject it - that there is a very real risk to the football club if this matter is not resolved."1
-
Kreamer: "These are sanctions of the very most serious nature and wide-reaching. The regulations refer to disciplinary proceedings. It's not overstating it - and Panorama reject it - that there is a very real risk to the football club if this matter is not resolved."
1 -
Hang on, 90 minutes ago everyone said we were dead!6
-
Chaisty polished the hell out of a turd but that doesn't mean it's a diamond1
-
Has MM fucked it5
-
Kreamer points to EFL rules that clubs will be disciplined for the involvement of individuals who have failed OADT0
This discussion has been closed.
