Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Macauley Bonne joins QPR for £2m (Ed. Joined Ipswich on loan)
Comments
-
Exiled_Addick said:Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will.
I imagine he would have had far more impact after January than say Schwartz3 -
nelsonsleftfoot said:Stockley is a much better bet.3
-
.0
-
So both Bonne and Taylor amassed 4 goals each, the same amount as Sarr.
Haha29 -
killerandflash said:Exiled_Addick said:Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will.
I imagine he would have had far more impact after January than say Schwartz
The problem was we were conceding 2 goals a game. Scoring goals was never the problem.
We've given Burton 6 points, shipping 6 goals. Drawn 2-2 with Swindon twice. 2-2 against Plymouth. 4-4 against bloody Rochdale. That's why we're not in the playoffs.
We were 100% correct to take £2m for him, it was incredible business.10 -
Bonne was a limited player, but had a very good habit of being in the right place at the right time.1
-
Awful footballer. And always was.cafcnick1992 said:Bonne was a limited player, but had a very good habit of being in the right place at the right time.1
-
Exiled_Addick said:Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will.0
-
Chunes said:Awful footballer. And always was.cafcnick1992 said:Bonne was a limited player, but had a very good habit of being in the right place at the right time.
He would have been very useful to us this season, but £2m was a lot of money.1 -
Would not mind him back either.3
-
Sponsored links:
-
Redrobo said:Chunes said:Awful footballer. And always was.cafcnick1992 said:Bonne was a limited player, but had a very good habit of being in the right place at the right time.
He would have been very useful to us this season, but £2m was a lot of money.
0 -
sam3110 said:So both Bonne and Taylor amassed 4 goals each, the same amount as Sarr.
Haha5 -
guinnessaddick said:Exiled_Addick said:Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will.1
-
Don’t think I ever saw him not run his nadgers off. Always put in the graft. That’s not always enough but it’s not his fault he wasn’t better than the ability he was given. Always thought he wasn’t quite good enough and I suspect he’ll get a decent career at league one. Don’t blame him one iota for grabbing a probably life changing contract at QPR. Charlton often get stung in transfer dealings but of the three parties involved, QPR got the shitty end of the stick on this one.8
-
People attack Bonne yet seem to forget that Stockley hardly tore up the Championship. He hardly excelled at that level.
Whatever Bonne's limitations were his goal return for us in the Championship was okay given the service.
3 -
Stockley and Bonne might work at this level but can't see Bonne returning0
-
KettsJohn said:Stockley and Bonne might work at this level but can't see Bonne returning0
-
I'll never forget him air swinging twice while trying to cross a ball at Craven Cottage, chap is a boiled ham.
£2m? proof is ever it was needed that transfer fees at that moment were insane.2 -
I was sorry to see him go as I thought he was a decent player,but £2m ,we could not turn that down.0
-
Somebody correct me if my memory is wrong but when Killer was sold to Derby it wasn’t a great success and it wasn’t because he couldn’t step up, it was because he was playing in a team where the midfield players, who were exceptional players in their own right, would rather shoot from 30 yards than use a proven striker who was deadly around the box. I liked Bonne. He did a great job stepping up to a charlton team that was punching above its weight with a squad that had been decimated by injuries. I’d take him back if QPR don’t know how to get the best out of him.5
-
Sponsored links:
-
It's all about levels I suppose.
He was phenomenal for Leyton Orient with 1 in 2 and pretty good for us with 1 in 3 and when you consider the step up he made to us it was probably worth the gamble for QPR to take him. At age 23/24? still time for improvement. Mind you, if it was my money I'd have offered 750 and stopped bidding at 1 million. Huh ... hark at me1 -
letthegoodtimesroll said:Somebody correct me if my memory is wrong but when Killer was sold to Derby it wasn’t a great success and it wasn’t because he couldn’t step up, it was because he was playing in a team where the midfield players, who were exceptional players in their own right, would rather shoot from 30 yards than use a proven striker who was deadly around the box. I liked Bonne. He did a great job stepping up to a charlton team that was punching above its weight with a squad that had been decimated by injuries. I’d take him back if QPR don’t know how to get the best out of him.10
-
sam3110 said:So both Bonne and Taylor amassed 4 goals each, the same amount as Sarr.
Haha
(PS joke as I rate Naby highly)0 -
Genuinely forgot about him and that he even existed.0
-
ShootersHillGuru said:letthegoodtimesroll said:Somebody correct me if my memory is wrong but when Killer was sold to Derby it wasn’t a great success and it wasn’t because he couldn’t step up, it was because he was playing in a team where the midfield players, who were exceptional players in their own right, would rather shoot from 30 yards than use a proven striker who was deadly around the box. I liked Bonne. He did a great job stepping up to a charlton team that was punching above its weight with a squad that had been decimated by injuries. I’d take him back if QPR don’t know how to get the best out of him.1
-
hoof_it_up_to_benty said:KettsJohn said:Stockley and Bonne might work at this level but can't see Bonne returning24
-
nelsonsleftfoot said:Stockley is a much better bet.
0 -
Redrobo said:hoof_it_up_to_benty said:KettsJohn said:Stockley and Bonne might work at this level but can't see Bonne returning0
-
Jac_52 said:killerandflash said:Exiled_Addick said:Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will.
I imagine he would have had far more impact after January than say Schwartz
The problem was we were conceding 2 goals a game. Scoring goals was never the problem.
We've given Burton 6 points, shipping 6 goals. Drawn 2-2 with Swindon twice. 2-2 against Plymouth. 4-4 against bloody Rochdale. That's why we're not in the playoffs.
We were 100% correct to take £2m for him, it was incredible business.
Looking at our league goal scoring tables
Bogle 2
Millar 2
Maddison 1
Smyth 1
Schwartz 1
Or Washington 11 goals in L1, when Bonne got 11 in the Championship last season.
I also find it a bit ironic when people get excited about the transfer fee. If Roland had been in charge, everyone would have been furious about him trousering £2m for selling our best players, and leaving us short up front4 -
hoof_it_up_to_benty said:nelsonsleftfoot said:Stockley is a much better bet.
I like Stockley and think he adds a lot to the team but there's nothing to suggest he'd be a more prolific goalscorer than Bonne0