Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Macauley Bonne joins QPR for £2m (Ed. Joined Ipswich on loan)

1272830323341

Comments

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,883
    Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will. 


    I still think that while we benefitted financially with the transfer fee, it had a negative impact on our season. How many goals would he have scored before Christmas when the likes of Bogle was having no impact. Another couple of wins and we'd be comfortably in the playoffs

    I imagine he would have had far more impact after January than say Schwartz
  • Stockley is a much better bet.

    Stockley's stats at Championship level are very poor.
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,873
    edited May 2021
    .
  • Jac_52
    Jac_52 Posts: 1,460
    Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will. 


    I still think that while we benefitted financially with the transfer fee, it had a negative impact on our season. How many goals would he have scored before Christmas when the likes of Bogle was having no impact. Another couple of wins and we'd be comfortably in the playoffs

    I imagine he would have had far more impact after January than say Schwartz

    The problem was we were conceding 2 goals a game. Scoring goals was never the problem.

    We've given Burton 6 points, shipping 6 goals. Drawn 2-2 with Swindon twice. 2-2 against Plymouth. 4-4 against bloody Rochdale. That's why we're not in the playoffs.

    We were 100% correct to take £2m for him, it was incredible business.
  • cafcnick1992
    cafcnick1992 Posts: 7,414
    Bonne was a limited player, but had a very good habit of being in the right place at the right time.
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,356
    edited May 2021
    Awful footballer. And always was.
    Bonne was a limited player, but had a very good habit of being in the right place at the right time.
    Not this season though, eh!
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,662
    Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will. 


    Expect his comment about QPR wanting him as a header tuner.
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    Chunes said:
    Awful footballer. And always was.
    Bonne was a limited player, but had a very good habit of being in the right place at the right time.
    Not this season though, eh!
    Difficult to score sitting on the bench.
    He would have been very useful to us this season, but £2m was a lot of money.
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,330
    Would not mind him back either.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,356
    edited May 2021
    Redrobo said:
    Chunes said:
    Awful footballer. And always was.
    Bonne was a limited player, but had a very good habit of being in the right place at the right time.
    Not this season though, eh!
    Difficult to score sitting on the bench.
    He would have been very useful to us this season, but £2m was a lot of money.
    You do get benched when you play poorly. I think they quickly realised what they had on their hands and went out and got another striker. 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,236
    sam3110 said:
    So both Bonne and Taylor amassed 4 goals each, the same amount as Sarr.

    Haha
    Shows how limited our options were last season and how well we did to take it to the last few minutes.
  • AddickUpNorth
    AddickUpNorth Posts: 8,325
    Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will. 


    Expect his comment about QPR wanting him as a header tuner.
    Still don’t get why QPR wanting you would be a head turner. It’s QPR ffs. His head was turned by the pay rise and no one can blame him for that.
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,629
    edited May 2021
    Don’t think I ever saw him not run his nadgers off. Always put in the graft. That’s not always enough but it’s not his fault he wasn’t better than the ability he was given. Always thought he wasn’t quite good enough and I suspect he’ll get a decent career at league one. Don’t blame him one iota for grabbing a probably life changing contract at QPR. Charlton often get stung in transfer dealings but of the three parties involved, QPR got the shitty end of the stick on this one.
  • People attack Bonne yet seem to forget that Stockley hardly tore up the Championship. He hardly excelled at that level.

    Whatever Bonne's limitations were his goal return for us in the Championship was okay given the service.







  • KettsJohn
    KettsJohn Posts: 1,211
    Stockley and Bonne might work at this level but can't see Bonne returning
  • KettsJohn said:
    Stockley and Bonne might work at this level but can't see Bonne returning
    We've got Washington who is okay at this level. Just need to see if we sign Stockley and keep Aneke.
  • Razor1890
    Razor1890 Posts: 31
    I'll never forget him air swinging twice while trying to cross a ball at Craven Cottage, chap is a boiled ham.

    £2m? proof is ever it was needed that transfer fees at that moment were insane.
  • thickandthin63
    thickandthin63 Posts: 2,959
    I was sorry to see him go as I thought he was a decent player,but £2m ,we could not turn that down.
  • Somebody correct me if my memory is wrong but when Killer was sold to Derby it wasn’t a great success and it wasn’t because he couldn’t step up, it was because he was playing in a team where the midfield players, who were exceptional players in their own right, would rather shoot from 30 yards than use a proven striker who was deadly around the box. I liked Bonne. He did a great job stepping up to a charlton team that was punching above its weight with a squad that had been decimated by injuries. I’d take him back if QPR don’t know how to get the best out of him. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • It's all about levels I suppose. 

    He was phenomenal for Leyton Orient with 1 in 2 and pretty good for us with 1 in 3 and when you consider the step up he made to us it was probably worth the gamble for QPR to take him.  At age 23/24? still time for improvement.  Mind you, if it was my money I'd have offered 750 and stopped bidding at 1 million. Huh ... hark at me  :)

     
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,629
    Somebody correct me if my memory is wrong but when Killer was sold to Derby it wasn’t a great success and it wasn’t because he couldn’t step up, it was because he was playing in a team where the midfield players, who were exceptional players in their own right, would rather shoot from 30 yards than use a proven striker who was deadly around the box. I liked Bonne. He did a great job stepping up to a charlton team that was punching above its weight with a squad that had been decimated by injuries. I’d take him back if QPR don’t know how to get the best out of him. 
    I’ve absolutely nothing against Macauley and wish him well but I’d be devastated if he is the culmination of our ambition. 
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 4,891
    sam3110 said:
    So both Bonne and Taylor amassed 4 goals each, the same amount as Sarr.

    Haha
    At which end were Naby’s scored though ??!!😀

    (PS joke as I rate Naby highly)
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,925
    Genuinely forgot about him and that he even existed. 
  • Somebody correct me if my memory is wrong but when Killer was sold to Derby it wasn’t a great success and it wasn’t because he couldn’t step up, it was because he was playing in a team where the midfield players, who were exceptional players in their own right, would rather shoot from 30 yards than use a proven striker who was deadly around the box. I liked Bonne. He did a great job stepping up to a charlton team that was punching above its weight with a squad that had been decimated by injuries. I’d take him back if QPR don’t know how to get the best out of him. 
    I’ve absolutely nothing against Macauley and wish him well but I’d be devastated if he is the culmination of our ambition. 
    If Bonne really is a crap a striker as that stat of 3 goals in 34 games for QPR shows then why do they keep playing him ? My guess is it’s because he’s being asked to do something that keeps him away from the goal.  A bit like the way Charlton used Macgennis when he played for us and he would be the only charlton player in the opposition half and we’d kick the ball up to him, expect him to win the ball wherever it was and beat the two or three defenders that had nobody else to mark. Those stats for orient and charlton on the other hand are pretty good, more so when you consider the circumstances at charlton at the time
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,957
    Stockley is a much better bet.

    Totally different player though, different role.


  • Redrobo said:
    KettsJohn said:
    Stockley and Bonne might work at this level but can't see Bonne returning
    We've got Washington who is okay at this level. Just need to see if we sign Stockley and keep Aneke.
    I would rather have Bonne than Washington.
    I would rather have Bonne and Washington as a two-prong strike force 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,883
    Jac_52 said:
    Everyone won on this one except QPR. Bonne moved when his stock was as high as it was ever likely to be we. We sold and got a great return. QPR took and expensive(ish) punt and lost. I hope Bonne has a good career, no reason we should bear him any ill will. 


    I still think that while we benefitted financially with the transfer fee, it had a negative impact on our season. How many goals would he have scored before Christmas when the likes of Bogle was having no impact. Another couple of wins and we'd be comfortably in the playoffs

    I imagine he would have had far more impact after January than say Schwartz

    The problem was we were conceding 2 goals a game. Scoring goals was never the problem.

    We've given Burton 6 points, shipping 6 goals. Drawn 2-2 with Swindon twice. 2-2 against Plymouth. 4-4 against bloody Rochdale. That's why we're not in the playoffs.

    We were 100% correct to take £2m for him, it was incredible business.
    Maybe we would have won those 2-2s 3-2 instead

    Looking at our league goal scoring tables

    Bogle 2
    Millar 2
    Maddison 1
    Smyth 1
    Schwartz 1

    Or Washington 11 goals in L1, when Bonne got 11 in the Championship last season. 

    I also find it a bit ironic when people get excited about the transfer fee. If Roland had been in charge, everyone would have been furious about him trousering £2m for selling our best players, and leaving us short up front
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,883
    Stockley is a much better bet.

    Stockley's stats at Championship level are very poor.
    Agreed, Stockley got 4 goals last season, and 1 in the first half of this season

    I like Stockley and think he adds a lot to the team but there's nothing to suggest he'd be a more prolific goalscorer than Bonne