Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Crossrail

145791030

Comments

  • Sark99
    Sark99 Posts: 181
    clive said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXGWKcoGynM
    Crossrail Chief Executive Mark Wild gives an update on latest progress, including handover of shafts & portals to TfL. Our focus is to start intensive operational testing known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity in 2021.

    Those of us who work on Crossrail know how much of a complex project it is.
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    Sark99 said:
    clive said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXGWKcoGynM
    Crossrail Chief Executive Mark Wild gives an update on latest progress, including handover of shafts & portals to TfL. Our focus is to start intensive operational testing known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity in 2021.

    Those of us who work on Crossrail know how much of a complex project it is.
    And how much money has been mismanaged and wasted on crap decisions 
  • cafc999 said:
    Sark99 said:
    clive said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXGWKcoGynM
    Crossrail Chief Executive Mark Wild gives an update on latest progress, including handover of shafts & portals to TfL. Our focus is to start intensive operational testing known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity in 2021.

    Those of us who work on Crossrail know how much of a complex project it is.
    And how much money has been mismanaged and wasted on crap decisions 
    Lots. Oh, and Mark Wild is a bellend. Have met him and had many interactions with him and he's properly up his own shit-pipe.
  • Sark99
    Sark99 Posts: 181
    cafc999 said:
    Sark99 said:
    clive said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXGWKcoGynM
    Crossrail Chief Executive Mark Wild gives an update on latest progress, including handover of shafts & portals to TfL. Our focus is to start intensive operational testing known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity in 2021.

    Those of us who work on Crossrail know how much of a complex project it is.
    And how much money has been mismanaged and wasted on crap decisions 
    cafc999 said:
    Sark99 said:
    clive said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXGWKcoGynM
    Crossrail Chief Executive Mark Wild gives an update on latest progress, including handover of shafts & portals to TfL. Our focus is to start intensive operational testing known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity in 2021.

    Those of us who work on Crossrail know how much of a complex project it is.
    And how much money has been mismanaged and wasted on crap decisions 
    Sounds like CAFC in the last 10 years 
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 33,997
    Sark99 said:
    cafc999 said:
    Sark99 said:
    clive said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXGWKcoGynM
    Crossrail Chief Executive Mark Wild gives an update on latest progress, including handover of shafts & portals to TfL. Our focus is to start intensive operational testing known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity in 2021.

    Those of us who work on Crossrail know how much of a complex project it is.
    And how much money has been mismanaged and wasted on crap decisions 
    cafc999 said:
    Sark99 said:
    clive said:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXGWKcoGynM
    Crossrail Chief Executive Mark Wild gives an update on latest progress, including handover of shafts & portals to TfL. Our focus is to start intensive operational testing known as Trial Running, at the earliest opportunity in 2021.

    Those of us who work on Crossrail know how much of a complex project it is.
    And how much money has been mismanaged and wasted on crap decisions 
    Sounds like CAFC in the last 10 years 
    No doubt, but I would imagine Charlton figures are a drop in the ocean compared to Crossrail 
  • DA7
    DA7 Posts: 126
    Rumour has it that the delay is due to having the destination screens displayed in 15 different languages
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    DA7 said:
    Rumour has it that the delay is due to having the destination screens displayed in 15 different languages
    Nah, it’s a special flooring, so you don’t damage your knuckles as you drag them along
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    I thought the received wisdom was that we were very good at this sort of thing!

    After all we managed to put on the 2012 Olympics for only £12 billion pounds and all on time! We even had a quarter of a billion left over to build a new stadium for the 'ammers!
    £12 billion  wasted on a place that ended up being given away to West Ham and running  costs partly moved to the residents of Newham.

    The Olympics is way to expensive and way too big in that there are sports that have their own World Stage competitions like Football, etc.

    Ask Brazil. It caused holes in social spending that exist today. And it had the World cup which made things even more expensive. 
    The whole Olympic Park wasn't handed to West Ham, the Stadium was, but not the massive regeneration of that part of London. But don't let fact get in the way of a rant
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    Rothko said:
    I thought the received wisdom was that we were very good at this sort of thing!

    After all we managed to put on the 2012 Olympics for only £12 billion pounds and all on time! We even had a quarter of a billion left over to build a new stadium for the 'ammers!
    £12 billion  wasted on a place that ended up being given away to West Ham and running  costs partly moved to the residents of Newham.

    The Olympics is way to expensive and way too big in that there are sports that have their own World Stage competitions like Football, etc.

    Ask Brazil. It caused holes in social spending that exist today. And it had the World cup which made things even more expensive. 
    The whole Olympic Park wasn't handed to West Ham, the Stadium was, but not the massive regeneration of that part of London. But don't let fact get in the way of a rant
    I know it wasn't.  IMHO it was a big waste of money that could have filled the Social Care hole we still face. 
    The legacy promised is laughable. Plus if you have been to a match at the Olympic Stadium you will know far one has to treck from public transport and just how torturous a treck out via the traffic lights and stop signs and myriads of stewards required to stop jams at pinch points. An absolute nightmare only to end up at the Stratford shopping centre at 5.25 with all the shoppers going home.
    Thst is a rant ! Saying it was £12 billion  wasted was not.
    You're still going on about the stadium and the stadium alone, not the park, velodrome, hockey centre, copper box, not the massive investment in housing, or environmental improvements, or the jobs at Here East/Westfield, or cleaning up a load of waste. 

    £12bn investment in that part of London, which included improving public transport will pay back in plenty in time. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842
    Rothko said:
    I thought the received wisdom was that we were very good at this sort of thing!

    After all we managed to put on the 2012 Olympics for only £12 billion pounds and all on time! We even had a quarter of a billion left over to build a new stadium for the 'ammers!
    £12 billion  wasted on a place that ended up being given away to West Ham and running  costs partly moved to the residents of Newham.

    The Olympics is way to expensive and way too big in that there are sports that have their own World Stage competitions like Football, etc.

    Ask Brazil. It caused holes in social spending that exist today. And it had the World cup which made things even more expensive. 
    The whole Olympic Park wasn't handed to West Ham, the Stadium was, but not the massive regeneration of that part of London. But don't let fact get in the way of a rant
    I know it wasn't.  IMHO it was a big waste of money that could have filled the Social Care hole we still face. 
    The legacy promised is laughable. Plus if you have been to a match at the Olympic Stadium you will know far one has to treck from public transport and just how torturous a treck out via the traffic lights and stop signs and myriads of stewards required to stop jams at pinch points. An absolute nightmare only to end up at the Stratford shopping centre at 5.25 with all the shoppers going home.
    Thst is a rant ! Saying it was £12 billion  wasted was not.

    Unusual for you.
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    Rothko said:
    Rothko said:
    I thought the received wisdom was that we were very good at this sort of thing!

    After all we managed to put on the 2012 Olympics for only £12 billion pounds and all on time! We even had a quarter of a billion left over to build a new stadium for the 'ammers!
    £12 billion  wasted on a place that ended up being given away to West Ham and running  costs partly moved to the residents of Newham.

    The Olympics is way to expensive and way too big in that there are sports that have their own World Stage competitions like Football, etc.

    Ask Brazil. It caused holes in social spending that exist today. And it had the World cup which made things even more expensive. 
    The whole Olympic Park wasn't handed to West Ham, the Stadium was, but not the massive regeneration of that part of London. But don't let fact get in the way of a rant
    I know it wasn't.  IMHO it was a big waste of money that could have filled the Social Care hole we still face. 
    The legacy promised is laughable. Plus if you have been to a match at the Olympic Stadium you will know far one has to treck from public transport and just how torturous a treck out via the traffic lights and stop signs and myriads of stewards required to stop jams at pinch points. An absolute nightmare only to end up at the Stratford shopping centre at 5.25 with all the shoppers going home.
    Thst is a rant ! Saying it was £12 billion  wasted was not.
    You're still going on about the stadium and the stadium alone, not the park, velodrome, hockey centre, copper box, not the massive investment in housing, or environmental improvements, or the jobs at Here East/Westfield, or cleaning up a load of waste. 

    £12bn investment in that part of London, which included improving public transport will pay back in plenty in time. 
    Never let the truth get in the way of a rant. The legacy left behind by the 2012 Olympics has, IMHO, been fantastic (Apart from West Ham having the stadium for nowt)
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    Rothko said:
    Rothko said:
    I thought the received wisdom was that we were very good at this sort of thing!

    After all we managed to put on the 2012 Olympics for only £12 billion pounds and all on time! We even had a quarter of a billion left over to build a new stadium for the 'ammers!
    £12 billion  wasted on a place that ended up being given away to West Ham and running  costs partly moved to the residents of Newham.

    The Olympics is way to expensive and way too big in that there are sports that have their own World Stage competitions like Football, etc.

    Ask Brazil. It caused holes in social spending that exist today. And it had the World cup which made things even more expensive. 
    The whole Olympic Park wasn't handed to West Ham, the Stadium was, but not the massive regeneration of that part of London. But don't let fact get in the way of a rant
    I know it wasn't.  IMHO it was a big waste of money that could have filled the Social Care hole we still face. 
    The legacy promised is laughable. Plus if you have been to a match at the Olympic Stadium you will know far one has to treck from public transport and just how torturous a treck out via the traffic lights and stop signs and myriads of stewards required to stop jams at pinch points. An absolute nightmare only to end up at the Stratford shopping centre at 5.25 with all the shoppers going home.
    Thst is a rant ! Saying it was £12 billion  wasted was not.
    You're still going on about the stadium and the stadium alone, not the park, velodrome, hockey centre, copper box, not the massive investment in housing, or environmental improvements, or the jobs at Here East/Westfield, or cleaning up a load of waste. 

    £12bn investment in that part of London, which included improving public transport will pay back in plenty in time. 
    Some of the areas in and around stratford have been utterly transformed from 15 years ago. 

    Crossrail is a fantastic project terribly executed, we need much more high speed rail connections all over the country. I think I said it before in this thread but we need more crossrail type projects not less.
  • Leroy Ambrose
    Leroy Ambrose Posts: 14,436
    Man who doesn't live in area completely transformed by the regeneration in 'what a waste of money' shocker... 
  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,450

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsYJgxRLDiU

    Railway Progress: Woolwich Elizabeth line station (July 2021)

  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,350
    Stratford will come good!  :D

    You either have direct govt finance greasing the rails for private development to step in, as in Stratford and CW.  Or you let private money do what they want as in Nine Elms/Battersea. The  quality of the architecture is subjective of course but either way something does get built rather than acres and acres of 50 year old post industrial dereliction that local councils have not got a hope of financing improvements themselves historically.

    Complete sea change in attitude towards affordable housing needed, but i will not hold my breath while the market is king. London is huge and they will keep building. Knights Dragon have land banked a chunk of the Greenwich Peninsular, that they should be forced to build, part buy/shared ownership.

    Anyway,  have we signed anyone else?


  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,450

    A full Crossrail timetable will not be in operation until May 2023, the Public Accounts Committee has been told.

    However, it heard the first section between Abbey Wood and Paddington should open between February and June.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-57890384

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,842
    clive said:

    A full Crossrail timetable will not be in operation until May 2023, the Public Accounts Committee has been told.

    However, it heard the first section between Abbey Wood and Paddington should open between February and June.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-57890384

    February and June 2032, sorry 2022 that is
  • stoneroses19
    stoneroses19 Posts: 7,219
    Unbelievable. Even with the pandemic, it’s terrible how late Crossrail is to be operational. 
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,619
    Unbelievable. Even with the pandemic, it’s terrible how late Crossrail is to be operational. 
    I’m convinced the hyperloop will be in service in no time.
  • Sponsored links:



  • I saw a crossrail train leaving abbey wood today. (Pictures to follow)
    Then this report in today's Guardian. Nearly there now..

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/nov/22/start-of-final-crossrail-trials-in-london-raises-hope-of-early-2022-opening


  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,046
    I saw a crossrail train leaving abbey wood today. (Pictures to follow)
    Then this report in today's Guardian. Nearly there now..

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/nov/22/start-of-final-crossrail-trials-in-london-raises-hope-of-early-2022-opening


    I’m assuming they’ve been overwhelmed with volunteer passenger requests from Charlton fans 😉
  • I just don't understand why anyone would want to get to Abbey Wood faster.
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842
    I just don't understand why anyone would want to get to Abbey Wood faster.
    Ah - but surely you can also leave Abbey Wood faster!
  • I just don't understand why anyone would want to get to Abbey Wood faster.
    But you can understand why they would want to get away from there faster, I trust 😉
  • bobmunro said:
    I just don't understand why anyone would want to get to Abbey Wood faster.
    Ah - but surely you can also leave Abbey Wood faster!
    Bastardo- beat me to it !!
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,842
    bobmunro said:
    I just don't understand why anyone would want to get to Abbey Wood faster.
    Ah - but surely you can also leave Abbey Wood faster!
    Bastardo- beat me to it !!
    You snooze, you lose!
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,801
    Gonna knock 40 minutes off my commute, so quicker out of Abbey Wood works well for me
  • bobmunro said:
    I just don't understand why anyone would want to get to Abbey Wood faster.
    Ah - but surely you can also leave Abbey Wood faster!
    Nod GIFs  Tenor
  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,450

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXZ2BEthYEc

    Progress Update (November 2021)