Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Charlton Only - January 2022 Transfer Rumours (Deadline Day p.97)
Comments
-
Save the Blackpool oneAFKABartram said:
Without coming over all Lindsey Hoyle, no one has the right to influence who should and should not post on here other than the site moderators. This has been creeping in a lot on here recently and it really needs stopping now. Whether that be Blackpool, or Golfie or Ronnie Moore etc.Redrobo said:
I thought you were going to have a rest from posting and give us all a welcome break.blackpool72 said:
Regarding your last sentence could've done it better.lonman said:
I'm sure if we matched Chucks wage demands he would still of gone to Birmingham, bigger club, higher level and Bowyer was the manager. It hasn't worked out for him (because in my opinion he ain't that great) and TS spent £300k to bring him back. Everyone complaining TS spends no money. When money is spent a couple of wise guys on a Charlton forum could've done it better.blackpool72 said:
Exactly this.Tonbridgeaddick said:
Don’t you trust Thomas and his astute financial wizardry…i.e spending £300k for somebody that left for free 6 months earlier.Wheresmeticket? said:I am really starting to think that this is it for our club at least for the next 10 or so years. There isn't really any indication that anyone that can afford the expenditure for a serious push and who understands football is interested.
unless TS gets some investment, because he’s rich, but not rich enough, we can’t compete with the likes of Wigan, Sunderland, Ipswich
Although I just get loled when I question our saviour
We are in the bottom half of league one about 6 points above the relegation zone.
This is the third transfer window Sandgaard has been in charge of.
So I would say things could and should have been done better.Crack on @blackpool72 you are a very well respected and valued poster on here.
No one wants this to be an echo chamber. It would be sh*t.
Not that he needs saving, he can look after himself
0 -
17 -
Hear! Hear!AFKABartram said:
Without coming over all Lindsey Hoyle, no one has the right to influence who should and should not post on here other than the site moderators. This has been creeping in a lot on here recently and it really needs stopping now. Whether that be Blackpool, or Golfie or Ronnie Moore etc.Redrobo said:
I thought you were going to have a rest from posting and give us all a welcome break.blackpool72 said:
Regarding your last sentence could've done it better.lonman said:
I'm sure if we matched Chucks wage demands he would still of gone to Birmingham, bigger club, higher level and Bowyer was the manager. It hasn't worked out for him (because in my opinion he ain't that great) and TS spent £300k to bring him back. Everyone complaining TS spends no money. When money is spent a couple of wise guys on a Charlton forum could've done it better.blackpool72 said:
Exactly this.Tonbridgeaddick said:
Don’t you trust Thomas and his astute financial wizardry…i.e spending £300k for somebody that left for free 6 months earlier.Wheresmeticket? said:I am really starting to think that this is it for our club at least for the next 10 or so years. There isn't really any indication that anyone that can afford the expenditure for a serious push and who understands football is interested.
unless TS gets some investment, because he’s rich, but not rich enough, we can’t compete with the likes of Wigan, Sunderland, Ipswich
Although I just get loled when I question our saviour
We are in the bottom half of league one about 6 points above the relegation zone.
This is the third transfer window Sandgaard has been in charge of.
So I would say things could and should have been done better.Crack on @blackpool72 you are a very well respected and valued poster on here.
No one wants this to be an echo chamber. It would be sh*t.3 -
AFKABartram said:
Without coming over all Lindsey Hoyle, no one has the right to influence who should and should not post on here other than the site moderators. This has been creeping in a lot on here recently and it really needs stopping now. Whether that be Blackpool, or Golfie or Ronnie Moore etc.Redrobo said:
I thought you were going to have a rest from posting and give us all a welcome break.blackpool72 said:
Regarding your last sentence could've done it better.lonman said:
I'm sure if we matched Chucks wage demands he would still of gone to Birmingham, bigger club, higher level and Bowyer was the manager. It hasn't worked out for him (because in my opinion he ain't that great) and TS spent £300k to bring him back. Everyone complaining TS spends no money. When money is spent a couple of wise guys on a Charlton forum could've done it better.blackpool72 said:
Exactly this.Tonbridgeaddick said:
Don’t you trust Thomas and his astute financial wizardry…i.e spending £300k for somebody that left for free 6 months earlier.Wheresmeticket? said:I am really starting to think that this is it for our club at least for the next 10 or so years. There isn't really any indication that anyone that can afford the expenditure for a serious push and who understands football is interested.
unless TS gets some investment, because he’s rich, but not rich enough, we can’t compete with the likes of Wigan, Sunderland, Ipswich
Although I just get loled when I question our saviour
We are in the bottom half of league one about 6 points above the relegation zone.
This is the third transfer window Sandgaard has been in charge of.
So I would say things could and should have been done better.Crack on @blackpool72 you are a very well respected and valued poster on here.
No one wants this to be an echo chamber. It would be sh*t.
Why is this muppet still allowed to spout his perpetual touchy feely nonsense on here?32 -
What number in the order should that be taken?Wheresmeticket? said:
In that order? Only if you have some charlie to go with it otherwise you'll pass out.Todds_right_hook said:Everyone needs to have a beer/wine/joint, chill and be nice.0 -
ShitAFKABartram said:
Without coming over all Lindsey Hoyle, no one has the right to influence who should and should not post on here other than the site moderators. This has been creeping in a lot on here recently and it really needs stopping now. Whether that be Blackpool, or Golfie or Ronnie Moore etc.Redrobo said:
I thought you were going to have a rest from posting and give us all a welcome break.blackpool72 said:
Regarding your last sentence could've done it better.lonman said:
I'm sure if we matched Chucks wage demands he would still of gone to Birmingham, bigger club, higher level and Bowyer was the manager. It hasn't worked out for him (because in my opinion he ain't that great) and TS spent £300k to bring him back. Everyone complaining TS spends no money. When money is spent a couple of wise guys on a Charlton forum could've done it better.blackpool72 said:
Exactly this.Tonbridgeaddick said:
Don’t you trust Thomas and his astute financial wizardry…i.e spending £300k for somebody that left for free 6 months earlier.Wheresmeticket? said:I am really starting to think that this is it for our club at least for the next 10 or so years. There isn't really any indication that anyone that can afford the expenditure for a serious push and who understands football is interested.
unless TS gets some investment, because he’s rich, but not rich enough, we can’t compete with the likes of Wigan, Sunderland, Ipswich
Although I just get loled when I question our saviour
We are in the bottom half of league one about 6 points above the relegation zone.
This is the third transfer window Sandgaard has been in charge of.
So I would say things could and should have been done better.Crack on @blackpool72 you are a very well respected and valued poster on here.
No one wants this to be an echo chamber. It would be sh*t.
Shit
Shit
Shi
Sh
S4 -
Thats my attempt at an echo in the written word btw 🤷♂️11
-
The order they are in. Beer and wine feel fine, wine and beer..........Todds_right_hook said:
What number in the order should that be taken?Wheresmeticket? said:
In that order? Only if you have some charlie to go with it otherwise you'll pass out.Todds_right_hook said:Everyone needs to have a beer/wine/joint, chill and be nice.0 -
where should Charlie be added into the orderCafc43v3r said:
The order they are in. Beer and wine feel fine, wine and beer..........Todds_right_hook said:
What number in the order should that be taken?Wheresmeticket? said:
In that order? Only if you have some charlie to go with it otherwise you'll pass out.Todds_right_hook said:Everyone needs to have a beer/wine/joint, chill and be nice.0 -
Overarching?Todds_right_hook said:
where should Charlie be added into the orderCafc43v3r said:
The order they are in. Beer and wine feel fine, wine and beer..........Todds_right_hook said:
What number in the order should that be taken?Wheresmeticket? said:
In that order? Only if you have some charlie to go with it otherwise you'll pass out.Todds_right_hook said:Everyone needs to have a beer/wine/joint, chill and be nice.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
https://www.footballinsider247.com/sources-charlton-athletic-agree-to-sign-middlesbrough-star-browne
Charlton Athletic have agreed a deal to sign Middlesbrough attacker Marcus Browne, Football Insider understands.
The former West Ham man, 24, is back to fitness after recovering from an ACL knee injury last January and Boro are happy to let him go in the current window.
5 -
Do i not get some points for my cryptic 'leftfield' post on page 31, backed up by my doubting of the right back last night? That doesn't top naming the player of course but marks for earlier post and hint at position surely if we are playing the 'Intheknowarumopoly' ? I'm being sworn to secrecy which is a seious handicap but doing my best to compete ?_MrDick said:
Follow this man … he is ITKRedvaliant said:Castillo as I posted Page 41. I don't think Lavinier is the Spurs guy.5 -
Well DM me the name and I will ensure you get your kudos or notDOUCHER said:
Do i not get some points for my cryptic 'leftfield' post on page 31, backed up by my doubting of the right back last night? That doesn't top naming the player of course but marks for earlier post and hint at position surely if we are playing the 'Intheknowarumopoly' ? I'm being sworn to secrecy which is a seious handicap but doing my best to compete ?_MrDick said:
Follow this man … he is ITKRedvaliant said:Castillo as I posted Page 41. I don't think Lavinier is the Spurs guy. 0 -
An attacking signing!0
-
Another one that will be available in the summer, will have a year left on his contract but Boro want him of the wage bill for their rebuild© CAFC2011charlton_hero said:2 -
Another one of those striker/wingers...charlton_hero said:
And also another player who's played at Oxford under Robinson, though a season before Clare and Lee0 -
Brilliant news. What this squad really lacks is wingers and players with bad injury history31
-
Assume that's Kirk off then0
-
Can I be the first to wrongly say we are only signing him because he was at Westham with Defoe?1
-
Sponsored links:
-
Positives: from London so might want to come 'home', did well for Oxford on loan, 11 goals in 36 starts.
Negatives: coming off a serious injury, has only played 138 league minutes since July 2020.0 -
An attacking midfielder that doesn't score goals and not played in a year, ideal.0
-
As long as he takes people on down the wing then he is better than DJ and Kirkkillerandflash said:
Another one of those striker/wingers...charlton_hero said:
And also another player who's played at Oxford under Robinson, though a season before Clare and Lee0 -
Fair enough.AFKABartram said:
Without coming over all Lindsey Hoyle, no one has the right to influence who should and should not post on here other than the site moderators. This has been creeping in a lot on here recently and it really needs stopping now. Whether that be Blackpool, or Golfie or Ronnie Moore etc.Redrobo said:
I thought you were going to have a rest from posting and give us all a welcome break.blackpool72 said:
Regarding your last sentence could've done it better.lonman said:
I'm sure if we matched Chucks wage demands he would still of gone to Birmingham, bigger club, higher level and Bowyer was the manager. It hasn't worked out for him (because in my opinion he ain't that great) and TS spent £300k to bring him back. Everyone complaining TS spends no money. When money is spent a couple of wise guys on a Charlton forum could've done it better.blackpool72 said:
Exactly this.Tonbridgeaddick said:
Don’t you trust Thomas and his astute financial wizardry…i.e spending £300k for somebody that left for free 6 months earlier.Wheresmeticket? said:I am really starting to think that this is it for our club at least for the next 10 or so years. There isn't really any indication that anyone that can afford the expenditure for a serious push and who understands football is interested.
unless TS gets some investment, because he’s rich, but not rich enough, we can’t compete with the likes of Wigan, Sunderland, Ipswich
Although I just get loled when I question our saviour
We are in the bottom half of league one about 6 points above the relegation zone.
This is the third transfer window Sandgaard has been in charge of.
So I would say things could and should have been done better.Crack on @blackpool72 you are a very well respected and valued poster on here.
No one wants this to be an echo chamber. It would be sh*t.
I apologise Blackpool.10 -
No need mate.Redrobo said:
Fair enough.AFKABartram said:
Without coming over all Lindsey Hoyle, no one has the right to influence who should and should not post on here other than the site moderators. This has been creeping in a lot on here recently and it really needs stopping now. Whether that be Blackpool, or Golfie or Ronnie Moore etc.Redrobo said:
I thought you were going to have a rest from posting and give us all a welcome break.blackpool72 said:
Regarding your last sentence could've done it better.lonman said:
I'm sure if we matched Chucks wage demands he would still of gone to Birmingham, bigger club, higher level and Bowyer was the manager. It hasn't worked out for him (because in my opinion he ain't that great) and TS spent £300k to bring him back. Everyone complaining TS spends no money. When money is spent a couple of wise guys on a Charlton forum could've done it better.blackpool72 said:
Exactly this.Tonbridgeaddick said:
Don’t you trust Thomas and his astute financial wizardry…i.e spending £300k for somebody that left for free 6 months earlier.Wheresmeticket? said:I am really starting to think that this is it for our club at least for the next 10 or so years. There isn't really any indication that anyone that can afford the expenditure for a serious push and who understands football is interested.
unless TS gets some investment, because he’s rich, but not rich enough, we can’t compete with the likes of Wigan, Sunderland, Ipswich
Although I just get loled when I question our saviour
We are in the bottom half of league one about 6 points above the relegation zone.
This is the third transfer window Sandgaard has been in charge of.
So I would say things could and should have been done better.Crack on @blackpool72 you are a very well respected and valued poster on here.
No one wants this to be an echo chamber. It would be sh*t.
I apologise Blackpool.
No problem from me.
All Charlton fan's at the end of the day.15 -
He does score goals though, 11 in 36 starts for Oxford. Of more concern though he got 14 yellow cards, and of course the injury.Belv said:An attacking midfielder that doesn't score goals and not played in a year, ideal.0 -
If fit, he’s definitely an upgrade on every winger we have at the club. The question is where do we play him and is he someone we actually need?charltonman2016 said:
As long as he takes people on down the wing then he is better than DJ and Kirkkillerandflash said:
Another one of those striker/wingers...charlton_hero said:
And also another player who's played at Oxford under Robinson, though a season before Clare and LeeI’ve always wanted to see a 3-4-3 (similar to what Chelsea play) and utilise all the wingers we have on the books - but it looks like we’re sticking with the 3-5-2.0 -
Haven’t we tried signing Browne in 2 or 3 different transfer window?1
-
I’m sure we all fondly remember the last Nottingham Forest player we signed on loan in Marcus Tudgay who managed 2 appearances and 0 goals.
Welcome Marcus Browne!0 -
He plays for BoroSheedyCAFC said:I’m sure we all fondly remember the last Nottingham Forest player we signed on loan in Marcus Tudgay who managed 2 appearances and 0 goals.
Welcome Marcus Browne!31
