Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Charlton announce five-year partnership with RSK
Comments
-
-
Not abandoning their Russia based colleagues.0
-
Definitely recyclable then.Covered End said:I've heard the shirts will be edible.0 -
Very well written statement. We should be happy to have a partnership with a company that has this kind of attitude. Yes they are stopping work with any Russian company/entities etc, but its good to see they are not just going abandon their colleagues, who, like the vast majority of the Russian public are not responsible for this WAR!. They are merely fed crap by Putin and his people, much the same as the dickhead in N. Korea feeds crap to his population.Henry Irving said:5 -
Look like a decent company. They’re in my target sector for my job. I’m going to start prospecting them
0 -
Off_it said:
Let me guess, you are "wary" of them all because of their skin colour?seth plum said:Athletico Charlton said:
Sustainability is one of the biggest growth industries in the UK. If I had kids heading towards degrees and A Levels I would be encouraging them into this field. It is the future and will see exponential growth as people realise all other industries are pointless without a planet capable of supporting life.seth plum said:Never heard of them, no idea what they do to get money.
I looked up some of their website, and one of the board members is called Nigel Board.
There is a photograph of all the board members on their site and there is one especially interesting feature of the montage.
It looks as if they get money by being paid to suggest things, like the care of soil on a construction site.
Are they consultants?
I was once told that a consultant will tell you 200 ways to have sex, but they wouldn’t have a partner themselves.
0 -
So what is the interesting feature of the montage?0
-
0 -
Someone's learned how to post GIFs recently then.0
-
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Do you even watch their YouTube content? I like Brad & Lex, but don't really get the relevance of them in your GIFs.0
-
0 -
My explanation was edited at 2.24pm.0
-
So what is the interesting feature of the montage? I edited my comment as on re-reading I couldn't work out if you were or were not bashing their board based on their skin colour. (off it's post kind of led mine).0
-
-
Used to watch this channel. Have you watched any if their content @seth plum ?seth plum said:0 -
Redbus went under as well I thinkHenry Irving said:DubaiCAFC said:Charlton do seem to have a track record of sponsors going out of business.. I can think of 2 or 3
No recently.
Last five all still around
KW
Betdaq
Andrews
University of Greenwich
KRBS
Others like Mesh and Viglin still around in different forms (Viglin were bought by Amstrad IIRC)
Woolwich were absorbed by Barclays, Fads went but a long time after our deal ended.
Llanera and all:sports went under but I think Cabrini are still around.
Not sure about Sunley Builders0 -
I think if you re-read my post you will see that I did not 'bash' their board.Dazzler21 said:So what is the interesting feature of the montage? I edited my comment as on re-reading I couldn't work out if you were or were not bashing their board based on their skin colour. (off it's post kind of led mine).
Unlike some on here who like to bash the Bishop.0 -
Yes.Gribbo said:
Used to watch this channel. Have you watched any if their content @seth plum ?seth plum said:
Often a very cheery watch.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Nothing wrong with bashing the bishopseth plum said:
I think if you re-read my post you will see that I did not 'bash' their board.Dazzler21 said:So what is the interesting feature of the montage? I edited my comment as on re-reading I couldn't work out if you were or were not bashing their board based on their skin colour. (off it's post kind of led mine).
Unlike some on here who like to bash the Bishop.2 -
Thought they might've been a bit too conservative for youseth plum said:
Yes.Gribbo said:
Used to watch this channel. Have you watched any if their content @seth plum ?seth plum said:
Often a very cheery watch.0 -
Don’t be silly.Covered End said:I'm hoping it's a good deal, but as we don't know what the deal is (as one would expect), who knows?
It could be worth £100K or more than £1M.Seems like an interesting company and I agree it’s good they aren’t from the usual betting mobs, etc. I would think it’s a good as we are going to get in L1. But it ain’t gonna be much over £100k pa without promotion - maybe 2.5% of ticket revenue?0 -
That'll be about a tenner then after relegation, I bet RSK are desperately searching for a cooling off period on the contract or some other escape clause.1
-
Don't be silly, don't be silly!Airman Brown said:
Don’t be silly.Covered End said:I'm hoping it's a good deal, but as we don't know what the deal is (as one would expect), who knows?
It could be worth £100K or more than £1M.Seems like an interesting company and I agree it’s good they aren’t from the usual betting mobs, etc. I would think it’s a good as we are going to get in L1. But it ain’t gonna be much over £100k pa without promotion - maybe 2.5% of ticket revenue?
If you're correct and it's worth £100K pa, over 5 years = £500K.
I said it could be worth £100K to £1M+, which is what £500K is.
In fact £500K is pretty much bang in the middle of what I said.
Don't be silly yourself!1 -
Yes, I knew you would say that, but it’s not a good argument. A value of £100k would decent for L1 (assuming it’s that much) but we don’t know what division we may be over the next five years (I’m putting that neutrally!).Covered End said:
Don't be silly, don't be silly!Airman Brown said:
Don’t be silly.Covered End said:I'm hoping it's a good deal, but as we don't know what the deal is (as one would expect), who knows?
It could be worth £100K or more than £1M.Seems like an interesting company and I agree it’s good they aren’t from the usual betting mobs, etc. I would think it’s a good as we are going to get in L1. But it ain’t gonna be much over £100k pa without promotion - maybe 2.5% of ticket revenue?
If you're correct and it's worth £100K pa, over 5 years = £500K.
I said it could be worth £100K to £1M+, which is what £500K is.
In fact £500K is pretty much bang in the middle of what I said.
Don't be silly yourself!
£100k is roughly 2.5% of ticket revenue (again currently). I think we need to focus on that because people often claim that sponsorship is key to the club’s finances. It’s useful, but it’s a relatively minor consideration if you’re losing £8m (a year, not over five years).
0 -
I'm pleased you knew that I would point out that I was correct and you shouldn't have told me not to be silly.Airman Brown said:
Yes, I knew you would say that, but it’s not a good argument. A value of £100k would decent for L1 (assuming it’s that much) but we don’t know what division we may be over the next five years (I’m putting that neutrally!).Covered End said:
Don't be silly, don't be silly!Airman Brown said:
Don’t be silly.Covered End said:I'm hoping it's a good deal, but as we don't know what the deal is (as one would expect), who knows?
It could be worth £100K or more than £1M.Seems like an interesting company and I agree it’s good they aren’t from the usual betting mobs, etc. I would think it’s a good as we are going to get in L1. But it ain’t gonna be much over £100k pa without promotion - maybe 2.5% of ticket revenue?
If you're correct and it's worth £100K pa, over 5 years = £500K.
I said it could be worth £100K to £1M+, which is what £500K is.
In fact £500K is pretty much bang in the middle of what I said.
Don't be silly yourself!
£100k is roughly 2.5% of ticket revenue (again currently). I think we need to focus on that because people often claim that sponsorship is key to the club’s finances. It’s useful, but it’s a relatively minor consideration if you’re losing £8m (a year, not over five years).
I have no idea what you're going on about telling me "it's not a good argument".
I'm not arguing at all.
I simply said we don't know what the deal is, it could be worth £100K or more than £1M.
You effectively agreed with me by suggesting it was worth £500K and called me silly for no reason.
3 -
We know it’s not going to be £20k a year so I would say that is silly.Covered End said:
I'm pleased you knew that I would point out that I was correct and you shouldn't have told me not to be silly.Airman Brown said:
Yes, I knew you would say that, but it’s not a good argument. A value of £100k would decent for L1 (assuming it’s that much) but we don’t know what division we may be over the next five years (I’m putting that neutrally!).Covered End said:
Don't be silly, don't be silly!Airman Brown said:
Don’t be silly.Covered End said:I'm hoping it's a good deal, but as we don't know what the deal is (as one would expect), who knows?
It could be worth £100K or more than £1M.Seems like an interesting company and I agree it’s good they aren’t from the usual betting mobs, etc. I would think it’s a good as we are going to get in L1. But it ain’t gonna be much over £100k pa without promotion - maybe 2.5% of ticket revenue?
If you're correct and it's worth £100K pa, over 5 years = £500K.
I said it could be worth £100K to £1M+, which is what £500K is.
In fact £500K is pretty much bang in the middle of what I said.
Don't be silly yourself!
£100k is roughly 2.5% of ticket revenue (again currently). I think we need to focus on that because people often claim that sponsorship is key to the club’s finances. It’s useful, but it’s a relatively minor consideration if you’re losing £8m (a year, not over five years).
I have no idea what you're going on about telling me "it's not a good argument".
I'm not arguing at all.
I simply said we don't know what the deal is, it could be worth £100K or more than £1M.
You effectively agreed with me by suggesting it was worth £500K and called me silly for no reason.0 -
You really can be obnoxious.Airman Brown said:
We know it’s not going to be £20k a year so I would say that is silly.Covered End said:
I'm pleased you knew that I would point out that I was correct and you shouldn't have told me not to be silly.Airman Brown said:
Yes, I knew you would say that, but it’s not a good argument. A value of £100k would decent for L1 (assuming it’s that much) but we don’t know what division we may be over the next five years (I’m putting that neutrally!).Covered End said:
Don't be silly, don't be silly!Airman Brown said:
Don’t be silly.Covered End said:I'm hoping it's a good deal, but as we don't know what the deal is (as one would expect), who knows?
It could be worth £100K or more than £1M.Seems like an interesting company and I agree it’s good they aren’t from the usual betting mobs, etc. I would think it’s a good as we are going to get in L1. But it ain’t gonna be much over £100k pa without promotion - maybe 2.5% of ticket revenue?
If you're correct and it's worth £100K pa, over 5 years = £500K.
I said it could be worth £100K to £1M+, which is what £500K is.
In fact £500K is pretty much bang in the middle of what I said.
Don't be silly yourself!
£100k is roughly 2.5% of ticket revenue (again currently). I think we need to focus on that because people often claim that sponsorship is key to the club’s finances. It’s useful, but it’s a relatively minor consideration if you’re losing £8m (a year, not over five years).
I have no idea what you're going on about telling me "it's not a good argument".
I'm not arguing at all.
I simply said we don't know what the deal is, it could be worth £100K or more than £1M.
You effectively agreed with me by suggesting it was worth £500K and called me silly for no reason.6 -
Tsk. Come on chaps, time to take a step back and lose yourselves in a consoling bottle of wine.Covered End said:
You really can be obnoxious.Airman Brown said:
We know it’s not going to be £20k a year so I would say that is silly.Covered End said:
I'm pleased you knew that I would point out that I was correct and you shouldn't have told me not to be silly.Airman Brown said:
Yes, I knew you would say that, but it’s not a good argument. A value of £100k would decent for L1 (assuming it’s that much) but we don’t know what division we may be over the next five years (I’m putting that neutrally!).Covered End said:
Don't be silly, don't be silly!Airman Brown said:
Don’t be silly.Covered End said:I'm hoping it's a good deal, but as we don't know what the deal is (as one would expect), who knows?
It could be worth £100K or more than £1M.Seems like an interesting company and I agree it’s good they aren’t from the usual betting mobs, etc. I would think it’s a good as we are going to get in L1. But it ain’t gonna be much over £100k pa without promotion - maybe 2.5% of ticket revenue?
If you're correct and it's worth £100K pa, over 5 years = £500K.
I said it could be worth £100K to £1M+, which is what £500K is.
In fact £500K is pretty much bang in the middle of what I said.
Don't be silly yourself!
£100k is roughly 2.5% of ticket revenue (again currently). I think we need to focus on that because people often claim that sponsorship is key to the club’s finances. It’s useful, but it’s a relatively minor consideration if you’re losing £8m (a year, not over five years).
I have no idea what you're going on about telling me "it's not a good argument".
I'm not arguing at all.
I simply said we don't know what the deal is, it could be worth £100K or more than £1M.
You effectively agreed with me by suggesting it was worth £500K and called me silly for no reason.
I know I have.
1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q624b9nNut0
