Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Summer 2022 transfer rumours (Gilbey loan confirmed p513, a signing falls through last minute p541)
Comments
-
DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.
So, what this shows is that despite ESI wasting money on themselves and Covid, which hit in March 2020, the operating loss in 2019/20 in the Championship was £5.3m, which was £6.6mm, £8.0m and £9.0m better than in L1 in the preceding three seasons. The main reason is the top line - central income. I would argue and have that Duchatelet should have spent SOME of that on improving the squad to increase the chances of staying up, but nothing like all of it.
The 2015/16 figure is an outlier because Duchatelet spent heavily trying to stay up which you can see was then largely recouped by player trading, The 2020/21 figure is distorted because almost all the season was behind closed doors and Sandgaard transferred the leasehold assets (the stands) to Roland as part of his lease agreement. They were previously on the football club balance sheet.
It is just a fact that Charlton have tended to lose less money in the Championship than L1, although the losses accelerated under Roland. The figure was £7.2m in 2013/14 and £7.8m in 2014/15.
Have a good look at those commercial income figures in L1 while you're there.2 -
Todds_right_hook said:RodneyCharltonTrotta said:Todds_right_hook said:WhenIwasLittleBoy said:Shopping in Poundland, the player has had no pre season meaning it will be atleast November before he is fully up to speed, why does that player not have a club ? Does that suggest he is past his best or injury prone ?
How many free agents have actually turned a clubs season around ?
There will unlikely be a Yann out there albeit some very appealing names on the available list such as Vydra and to a lesser extent Robson Kanu1 -
TheAddicks4Ever said:MUNGO BRIDGE is an available!!! He’s a Free Agent - he’ll bridge the gap we have at the back !13
-
cafcdave123 said:SantaClaus said:Don't give up hope, Josh Parker's still a free agent.
Zero Goals.0 -
JamesSeed said:TheAddicks4Ever said:MUNGO BRIDGE is an available!!! He’s a Free Agent - he’ll bridge the gap we have at the back !
Sorry being pedantic but meteorological autumn began yesterday...almost a great joke...😎😉4 -
CAFCTrev said:Airman Brown said:UEAAddick said:Airman Brown said:cafcdave123 said:J BLOCK said:I've always back Sandgaard, but the end of this window has done me. He hasn't got the resources, god knows what would happen if we got to the championship.
For us to compete properly, he needs to sell.
i think we are at least in a safe pair of hands with TS at the moment.
I would agree that Sandgaard is an upgrade on ESI and Duchatelet, has some positive personal qualities, and that the team is more interesting to watch and likely to do better than last season, but there is a big hole in the project and it is his credibility. It isn't going to work financially and for that reason the club is far from "safe", albeit it's a slow motion car crash this time.
The end game will be someone buying Duchatelet out, in my opinion. It won't be Thomas.
If someone buys duchatalet out, I can't see it being easy to do with the madness of him and even someone with serious wealth in the billions would have find it hard negotiating it with him or even contacting him.
Which is why I think were more likely to end up with crooks.
He could get lucky with Ben Garner or his successor, as Roland did, and get back in the Championship, which would help. But I still think are some very wealthy people around who may fancy a London-based club with a stadium equipped to host Premier League football and manage to sort Roland out with a deal based on the latter.
Would Sandgaard sell to crooks? I think better of him than that, but it may depend how desperate he gets.1 -
DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.QPR might be a better comparison…
https://gameofthepeople.com/2022/02/16/qpr-cut-their-losses-despite-matchday-hit/0 -
Fredrik Gulbrandsen - free agent - worth a punt?0
-
Wheresmeticket? said:DOUCHER said:Wheresmeticket? said:DOUCHER said:Covered End said:MuttleyCAFC said:Airman Brown said:cafcdave123 said:J BLOCK said:I've always back Sandgaard, but the end of this window has done me. He hasn't got the resources, god knows what would happen if we got to the championship.
For us to compete properly, he needs to sell.
i think we are at least in a safe pair of hands with TS at the moment.
I would agree that Sandgaard is an upgrade on ESI and Duchatelet, has some positive personal qualities, and that the team is more interesting to watch and likely to do better than last season, but there is a big hole in the project and it is his credibility. It isn't going to work financially and for that reason the club is far from "safe", albeit it's a slow motion car crash this time.
The end game will be someone buying Duchatelet out, in my opinion. It won't be Thomas.
Then you have the next most important. Charlton fans who may be a bit disillusioned in recent years and are no longer season ticket holders and um and ah about whether to attend a game or not. They are and always will be Charlton fans though. They are the next most important as they can make the crowds and revenues more decent but probably not enough ultimately. You can of course take a leaf out of a certain poster's book and call them all traitors and you know whats but that won't get them back. Good winning football and optimism for the future after so many knock backs will do that.
Then you have the most important fans of all. These are potential and fickle fans who need persuading Charlton is their club. The demographics in our catchment area is a positive and suggests there is something to unlock, but you need a key to unlock it. And a plan.
Of course this isn't fair on the true die hard fans but it that doesn't make it untrue IMO. There will always be a few thousand turning up and watching us play Barnet in the National League. But the club has to grow, not shrink. It is already in a place where it is too big to be viable and it either has to get out of that place or shrink appropriately. Which it is gradually doing from what I can see.
You claim to be more important to the club than me because I buy a S/T and attend all the games and you don't.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYOZ3IzRaf4
Difficult to be anything else since I moved to Cornwall.
Seriously I am glad there are diehard fans who turn up because that is what supporting the club means.1 -
TelMc32 said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.QPR might be a better comparison…
https://gameofthepeople.com/2022/02/16/qpr-cut-their-losses-despite-matchday-hit/2 - Sponsored links:
-
TheAddicks4Ever said:MUNGO BRIDGE is an available!!! He’s a Free Agent - he’ll bridge the gap we have at the back !
That'll confuse the youngsters5 -
soapboxsam said:cafcdave123 said:SantaClaus said:Don't give up hope, Josh Parker's still a free agent.
Zero Goals.2 -
eastterrace6168 said:JamesSeed said:TheAddicks4Ever said:MUNGO BRIDGE is an available!!! He’s a Free Agent - he’ll bridge the gap we have at the back !
Sorry being pedantic but meteorological autumn began yesterday...almost a great joke...😎😉0 -
Airman Brown said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.
So, what this shows is that despite ESI wasting money on themselves and Covid, which hit in March 2020, the operating loss in 2019/20 in the Championship was £5.3m, which was £6.6mm, £8.0m and £9.0m better than in L1 in the preceding three seasons. The main reason is the top line - central income. I would argue and have that Duchatelet should have spent SOME of that on improving the squad to increase the chances of staying up, but nothing like all of it.
The 2015/16 figure is an outlier because Duchatelet spent heavily trying to stay up which you can see was then largely recouped by player trading, The 2020/21 figure is distorted because almost all the season was behind closed doors and Sandgaard transferred the leasehold assets (the stands) to Roland as part of his lease agreement. They were previously on the football club balance sheet.
It is just a fact that Charlton have tended to lose less money in the Championship than L1, although the losses accelerated under Roland. The figure was £7.2m in 2013/14 and £7.8m in 2014/15.
Have a good look at those commercial income figures in L1 while you're there.2 -
TelMc32 said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.QPR might be a better comparison…
https://gameofthepeople.com/2022/02/16/qpr-cut-their-losses-despite-matchday-hit/0 -
The fixed costs that don’t change much I guess are the staff and the stadium costs regardless of league 1 or champ but the player wages are roughly double in the championship and they must be by far the biggest operating expenses so probably more than negates the central income and gate money ?0
-
JamesSeed said:TheAddicks4Ever said:MUNGO BRIDGE is an available!!! He’s a Free Agent - he’ll bridge the gap we have at the back !3
-
JamesSeed said:Todds_right_hook said:RodneyCharltonTrotta said:Todds_right_hook said:WhenIwasLittleBoy said:Shopping in Poundland, the player has had no pre season meaning it will be atleast November before he is fully up to speed, why does that player not have a club ? Does that suggest he is past his best or injury prone ?
How many free agents have actually turned a clubs season around ?
There will unlikely be a Yann out there albeit some very appealing names on the available list such as Vydra and to a lesser extent Robson Kanu0 -
Cafc43v3r said:Redrobo said:golfaddick said:Players like Robson Kanu & Vydra (who were playing for Premier League/high end Championship clubs) are not going to resettle in London for £3k-£5k per week. Not on your nelly.
The trouble with negativity is that nobody is good enough, too old, too young, unfit, injury prone, too expensive, too short, too timid, too aggressive etc etc. and you may well be right.
What I do know is that if you don’t try it certainly won’t happen. Remember when we signed the European footballer of the year?
So your suggestion is that we just give up. Well you go and hide behind the settee.0 -
DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.
So, what this shows is that despite ESI wasting money on themselves and Covid, which hit in March 2020, the operating loss in 2019/20 in the Championship was £5.3m, which was £6.6mm, £8.0m and £9.0m better than in L1 in the preceding three seasons. The main reason is the top line - central income. I would argue and have that Duchatelet should have spent SOME of that on improving the squad to increase the chances of staying up, but nothing like all of it.
The 2015/16 figure is an outlier because Duchatelet spent heavily trying to stay up which you can see was then largely recouped by player trading, The 2020/21 figure is distorted because almost all the season was behind closed doors and Sandgaard transferred the leasehold assets (the stands) to Roland as part of his lease agreement. They were previously on the football club balance sheet.
It is just a fact that Charlton have tended to lose less money in the Championship than L1, although the losses accelerated under Roland. The figure was £7.2m in 2013/14 and £7.8m in 2014/15.
Have a good look at those commercial income figures in L1 while you're there.
Roland/ESI could have spent another £5m on players' wages in 2019/20 and the operating loss would still have been lower than the preceding three seasons in L1 by some margin.4 - Sponsored links:
-
DOUCHER said:TelMc32 said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.QPR might be a better comparison…
https://gameofthepeople.com/2022/02/16/qpr-cut-their-losses-despite-matchday-hit/0 -
MillwallFan said:DOUCHER said:TelMc32 said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.QPR might be a better comparison…
https://gameofthepeople.com/2022/02/16/qpr-cut-their-losses-despite-matchday-hit/7 -
Airman Brown said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.
So, what this shows is that despite ESI wasting money on themselves and Covid, which hit in March 2020, the operating loss in 2019/20 in the Championship was £5.3m, which was £6.6mm, £8.0m and £9.0m better than in L1 in the preceding three seasons. The main reason is the top line - central income. I would argue and have that Duchatelet should have spent SOME of that on improving the squad to increase the chances of staying up, but nothing like all of it.
The 2015/16 figure is an outlier because Duchatelet spent heavily trying to stay up which you can see was then largely recouped by player trading, The 2020/21 figure is distorted because almost all the season was behind closed doors and Sandgaard transferred the leasehold assets (the stands) to Roland as part of his lease agreement. They were previously on the football club balance sheet.
It is just a fact that Charlton have tended to lose less money in the Championship than L1, although the losses accelerated under Roland. The figure was £7.2m in 2013/14 and £7.8m in 2014/15.
Have a good look at those commercial income figures in L1 while you're there.
Roland/ESI could have spent another £5m on players' wages in 2019/20 and the operating loss would still have been lower than the preceding three seasons in L1 by some margin.0 -
MillwallFan said:DOUCHER said:TelMc32 said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.QPR might be a better comparison…
https://gameofthepeople.com/2022/02/16/qpr-cut-their-losses-despite-matchday-hit/0 -
MillwallFan said:MillwallFan said:DOUCHER said:TelMc32 said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.QPR might be a better comparison…
https://gameofthepeople.com/2022/02/16/qpr-cut-their-losses-despite-matchday-hit/
1 -
MuttleyCAFC said:Airman Brown said:cafcdave123 said:J BLOCK said:I've always back Sandgaard, but the end of this window has done me. He hasn't got the resources, god knows what would happen if we got to the championship.
For us to compete properly, he needs to sell.
i think we are at least in a safe pair of hands with TS at the moment.
I would agree that Sandgaard is an upgrade on ESI and Duchatelet, has some positive personal qualities, and that the team is more interesting to watch and likely to do better than last season, but there is a big hole in the project and it is his credibility. It isn't going to work financially and for that reason the club is far from "safe", albeit it's a slow motion car crash this time.
The end game will be someone buying Duchatelet out, in my opinion. It won't be Thomas.
Then you have the next most important. Charlton fans who may be a bit disillusioned in recent years and are no longer season ticket holders and um and ah about whether to attend a game or not. They are and always will be Charlton fans though. They are the next most important as they can make the crowds and revenues more decent but probably not enough ultimately. You can of course take a leaf out of a certain poster's book and call them all traitors and you know whats but that won't get them back. Good winning football and optimism for the future after so many knock backs will do that.
Then you have the most important fans of all. These are potential and fickle fans who need persuading Charlton is their club. The demographics in our catchment area is a positive and suggests there is something to unlock, but you need a key to unlock it. And a plan.
Of course this isn't fair on the true die hard fans but it that doesn't make it untrue IMO. There will always be a few thousand turning up and watching us play Barnet in the National League. But the club has to grow, not shrink. It is already in a place where it is too big to be viable and it either has to get out of that place or shrink appropriately. Which it is gradually doing from what I can see.0 -
DOUCHER said:MillwallFan said:DOUCHER said:TelMc32 said:DOUCHER said:Airman Brown said:SteveKielyCambridge said:Airman Brown said:
It’s a dynamic situation, admittedly, but generally we have lost more money in L1 than in the Championship. I don’t accept it’s either/or - there is a middle ground which Millwall have occupied quite successfully in recent years. We were relegated in 19/20 because RD starved the football side of resources.
in any case, TS isn’t “running a tight ship” - he’s reducing crowds with unrealistic prices and removing committed staff on spurious grounds. It’s amateurish and so is his commentary on it.
In all likelihood by dint of finances or personality, TS cannot and will not make it work. He may have done better with a more professional approach but ultimately we need to get the ground back and that will take someone with bigger pockets.I do not claim any great knowledge of the veracity of the research, but according to this article, Millwall were running £10million losses annually even pre-Covid, and had lost £78million in the last decade. So, if that is accurate, it rather proves the point.I don't necessarily disagree with you that TS has made various mistakes (often in taking the fans at their word) and, personally, I would be more cautious with price rises than he has been - although it does strike me as hilarious that the same fans who are currently in meltdown because he is not putting his hand in his pocket to buy more players, simply decide not to show up when they are asked to put their hands in their own pockets.The facts remain: promotion does not offer a way out of this (just larger numbers on the P&L and the same debts, if not more), a cost-of-business crisis is coming (the club's electricity bill next quarter will be eye-watering), and so clubs need to cut their costs. You can certainly argue that TS is going about it in the wrong way, but this is a process that needs to happen.
Is Championship football the solution - no. But it gives you significantly more income to utilise and it makes you much more attractive to a buyer, plus it is an easier sell to fans.
How you conclude that fans not showing up are those concluding he should spend more money I have no idea. I should think most are season tickets holders.QPR might be a better comparison…
https://gameofthepeople.com/2022/02/16/qpr-cut-their-losses-despite-matchday-hit/0 -
I'll keep saying it:
Abolish the transfer window; it inflates prices, gets everyone too worked up, and yet it is totally unnecessary.9 -
Looking forward to that top half of division three finish Thomas? Yer plank!2
-
Redrobo said:Cafc43v3r said:Redrobo said:golfaddick said:Players like Robson Kanu & Vydra (who were playing for Premier League/high end Championship clubs) are not going to resettle in London for £3k-£5k per week. Not on your nelly.
The trouble with negativity is that nobody is good enough, too old, too young, unfit, injury prone, too expensive, too short, too timid, too aggressive etc etc. and you may well be right.
What I do know is that if you don’t try it certainly won’t happen. Remember when we signed the European footballer of the year?
So your suggestion is that we just give up. Well you go and hide behind the settee.
You bang on about how brilliant it is that we are "sustainable" and how brilliant it is, despite that fact we are not sustainable at all. Then you suggest paying a player the same as the rest of the team put together is worth trying.
I never once suggest we should give up.
But you keep believing everything is wonderful if it helps.3