Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2025

14849515354121

Comments

  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,765
    The only slight anomaly with Crawley is his record vs the Aussies which is pretty decent (average 43). His style will also massively help out in Oz.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,934
    fenaddick said:
    fenaddick said:
    Crawley had a great second innings at Headlingly which showed how he can play, the frustrating thing is the inconsistency 
    He did well but I wouldn't call "65" great. Duckett's 149 was great though. Take the Zimbabwe ton out (who, let's face it, aren't of Test quality) and the last time he hit one was virtually two years ago. 

    As I've said, Crawley averages 30.08 opening but if one considers that he averages 57.92 in the 9 games and 14 innings when we've drawn, it's not difficult to recognise that he is a flat track bully. In fact, he averages just 29.47 when we've won and 23.28 when we've lost. He is very lucky to have been given as many opportuniites as he has - 103 in total. 
    The innings was about more than just the score though, the way he played allowed Duckett to play how he did and have a fantastic innings. 

    Of course he needs to improve and up that average but sometimes an innings score doesn’t sum up how the innings was played or how important it was. 
    He's has 103 innings. I agree about the "sometimes" but the "sometimes" have been very, very few compared to the numerous failures.  
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,122
    I think ultimately Key and Baz have too much faith in Crawley to drop him

    Shame they wasted the Zimbabwe test on not looking at the other options. 
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 23,012
    fenaddick said:
    Ultimately if Crawley played how he did in that Headingley innings even 70% of the time we wouldn’t be having this conversation 
    Thought he was pretty lucky at Headingley though - wasn't by any means a chanceless 65.

    Wasn't like Pope in the first innings who looked really good.
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,934
    The only slight anomaly with Crawley is his record vs the Aussies which is pretty decent (average 43). His style will also massively help out in Oz.
    His average in Australia is 27.66. His scores there have been 12, 5, 18, 77, 18 & 36. 


  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,366
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,815
    The only slight anomaly with Crawley is his record vs the Aussies which is pretty decent (average 43). His style will also massively help out in Oz.
    If he's still in the team and he opens in Australia we deserve to lose. Enough is enough
  • DennisBooth
    DennisBooth Posts: 146
    Maybe dropping Crawley now is not the right thing to do with Australia on the horizon. But what if he fails in every Test against India? Do we still take him as he is so out of form? As AA says, his scores in Australia have not been great.
  • CHG
    CHG Posts: 4,533
    Agree, too late to find a replacement for Crawley now. We should have been testing out a new partner for Duckett from the Zimbabwe test…
  • DennisBooth
    DennisBooth Posts: 146
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,366
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,122
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    I'd say the whole Aussie top order bar Smith is probably in flux. Their top 3 could be absolutely anything. Don't think Marnus is guaranteed even. 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,743
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    Just because Australia are struggling with their opening partnership 's doesn't mean we can't improve ours. 
    The two things are not related. 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,761
    MarcusH26 said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    I'd say the whole Aussie top order bar Smith is probably in flux. Their top 3 could be absolutely anything. Don't think Marnus is guaranteed even. 
    He isn’t guaranteed at all, completely dropped for WI series. Green hasn’t looked any better there though. Lots of bat offs in the early round of the Sheffield Shield 
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,366
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    Just because Australia are struggling with their opening partnership 's doesn't mean we can't improve ours. 
    The two things are not related. 
    We should absolutely improve ours. If there's a tall, right handed, experienced opener who likes to play off the front foot and would have an instant understanding running between the wickets with Ben Duckett, he should be considered. 

    Is there someone who fits all these criteria? 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,934
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    Just because Australia are struggling with their opening partnership 's doesn't mean we can't improve ours. 
    The two things are not related. 
    We should absolutely improve ours. If there's a tall, right handed, experienced opener who likes to play off the front foot and would have an instant understanding running between the wickets with Ben Duckett, he should be considered. 

    Is there someone who fits all these criteria? 

    Can't you narrow your criteria even more? How about, "who possesses a glorious cover drive when the pitch is a road?"
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,743
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    Just because Australia are struggling with their opening partnership 's doesn't mean we can't improve ours. 
    The two things are not related. 
    We should absolutely improve ours. If there's a tall, right handed, experienced opener who likes to play off the front foot and would have an instant understanding running between the wickets with Ben Duckett, he should be considered. 

    Is there someone who fits all these criteria? 
    Hopefully yes.
    We won't know until we try.
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,122
    fenaddick said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    I'd say the whole Aussie top order bar Smith is probably in flux. Their top 3 could be absolutely anything. Don't think Marnus is guaranteed even. 
    He isn’t guaranteed at all, completely dropped for WI series. Green hasn’t looked any better there though. Lots of bat offs in the early round of the Sheffield Shield 
    I don't get the thinking with Green at 3 , feels like square peg in a round hole to accommodate him. I can't see them reverting to the likes of Matt Renshaw or Marcus Harris at the top of the order but they've really not got a lot of top order options. 

    Nathan McSweeney would probably be the obvious pick at 3 with Smith 4, Head 5 and Beau Webster at 6. But the openers is anyone's game. 
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,366
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    Just because Australia are struggling with their opening partnership 's doesn't mean we can't improve ours. 
    The two things are not related. 
    We should absolutely improve ours. If there's a tall, right handed, experienced opener who likes to play off the front foot and would have an instant understanding running between the wickets with Ben Duckett, he should be considered. 

    Is there someone who fits all these criteria? 
    Hopefully yes.
    We won't know until we try.
    Good answer
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 11,761
    MarcusH26 said:
    fenaddick said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    I'd say the whole Aussie top order bar Smith is probably in flux. Their top 3 could be absolutely anything. Don't think Marnus is guaranteed even. 
    He isn’t guaranteed at all, completely dropped for WI series. Green hasn’t looked any better there though. Lots of bat offs in the early round of the Sheffield Shield 
    I don't get the thinking with Green at 3 , feels like square peg in a round hole to accommodate him. I can't see them reverting to the likes of Matt Renshaw or Marcus Harris at the top of the order but they've really not got a lot of top order options. 

    Nathan McSweeney would probably be the obvious pick at 3 with Smith 4, Head 5 and Beau Webster at 6. But the openers is anyone's game. 
    The Green thing is crazy, he’s not a good enough batter or bowler to just do one and they seem to view him as an all rounder with little evidence he can do it. Not that I’m complaining of course 

  • Sponsored links:



  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,122
    fenaddick said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    fenaddick said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    I'd say the whole Aussie top order bar Smith is probably in flux. Their top 3 could be absolutely anything. Don't think Marnus is guaranteed even. 
    He isn’t guaranteed at all, completely dropped for WI series. Green hasn’t looked any better there though. Lots of bat offs in the early round of the Sheffield Shield 
    I don't get the thinking with Green at 3 , feels like square peg in a round hole to accommodate him. I can't see them reverting to the likes of Matt Renshaw or Marcus Harris at the top of the order but they've really not got a lot of top order options. 

    Nathan McSweeney would probably be the obvious pick at 3 with Smith 4, Head 5 and Beau Webster at 6. But the openers is anyone's game. 
    The Green thing is crazy, he’s not a good enough batter or bowler to just do one and they seem to view him as an all rounder with little evidence he can do it. Not that I’m complaining of course 
    It's against England they'll roll out Mitch Marsh at 3 or something. 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,743
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    Just because Australia are struggling with their opening partnership 's doesn't mean we can't improve ours. 
    The two things are not related. 
    We should absolutely improve ours. If there's a tall, right handed, experienced opener who likes to play off the front foot and would have an instant understanding running between the wickets with Ben Duckett, he should be considered. 

    Is there someone who fits all these criteria? 
    Hopefully yes.
    We won't know until we try.
    Good answer
    For what it's worth I agree with you that having a very tall Right handed opening batsman and a very short left handed opening batsman  is a good thing. 
    It must be very tough for the opening bowlers to have to keep changing their line and length every over. 
    In an ideal world Crawley would suddenly become more consistent and things would be perfect. 
    But if he continues getting low scores on a regular basis with only the odd decent score thrown in then there is an argument for trying someone else. 
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,366
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Chizz said:
    Opening partnerships this year 
    Crawley and Duckett 490 runs at 81.66 
    Khawaja and Head 162 at 54.00 
    Khawaja and Konstas 130 at 21.66 
    Kawaja and Labuschagne 40 at 20.00 

    There's something to be said for not chopping and changing. 
    There is also something to be said for reacting quickly. You can massage figures any way you like. I can produce a set of figures that completely contradict yours.
    I'm sure you can. But the point remains that, with Crawley and Duckett as an established opening partnership, Australia face significant questions still on who their openers will be. 
    Just because Australia are struggling with their opening partnership 's doesn't mean we can't improve ours. 
    The two things are not related. 
    We should absolutely improve ours. If there's a tall, right handed, experienced opener who likes to play off the front foot and would have an instant understanding running between the wickets with Ben Duckett, he should be considered. 

    Is there someone who fits all these criteria? 

    Can't you narrow your criteria even more? How about, "who possesses a glorious cover drive when the pitch is a road?"
    No, there wouldn't be any point in doing that. My list merely shows those facets that most benefit Duckett at the other end. 

    A tall batter compliments Duckett as makes length harder for the opposition bowlers. A right handed batter makes line hard. Duckett is superb square of the wicket, so a partner who plays off the front foot is an ideal foil. Duckett and Crawley run well together, so if Crawley were to be replaced it should be by someone who runs well with him. 

    The risk of replacing Crawley with someone - anyone - else is in compromising what he brings to the partnership. That's why, if Crawley were to be dropped and Duckett retained, then the player brought in should possess those same advantages. 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,934
    Crawley's last 20 innings for England:

    0
    3
    18
    78 (v Pakistan)
    27
    3
    29
    2
    0
    1
    17
    8
    21
    5
    124 (against the mighty Zimbabwe who even the SA captain felt sorry for)
    4
    65 (v India)
    19
    0
    18

    So that's an average of 22.10 and if we take out that Zimbabwe innings, that drops to 16.74. Given half of those are single digits, it's safe to conclude that very few of those have resulted in a meaningful opening partnership. Despite the fact that Crawley is "a tall, right handed, experienced opener who likes to play off the front foot".  
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,743
    England currently have 3 batsmen ranked in the world top ten.

    Root 
    Brooke 
    Smith.

    Sort out the top 3 in the batting order and we are in very good shape. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,032
    Crazy that Bethell is the next cab off the rank, when he has no centuries of any sort, and in 2025 has played ONE red ball game, scoring 20 and 12 for Warks against Somerset last month.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,402
    Sorry, are we actually taking Chizz seriously on a cricket thread? Have a word lads 
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,366
    Crazy that Bethell is the next cab off the rank, when he has no centuries of any sort, and in 2025 has played ONE red ball game, scoring 20 and 12 for Warks against Somerset last month.
    Who else is in the rank as a likely opening batter? 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,122
    Tom Haines should be the next cab off the rank , in great form for Sussex and hit 171 on a road at Canterbury Vs India A for the Lions
     
    Alas he's left handed and doesn't Bazball. 
  • kinveachyaddick
    kinveachyaddick Posts: 3,888
    Proper test cricket this now. This session will be huge and go a long way to deciding who wins this Test and goes 2-1 up