Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

England Cricket 2025

1…174175176177178180»

Comments

  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,899
    North Lower Neil said:
    Apparently the Snicko company are taking responsibility:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/articles/c0mpjw7g7nko

    Amazing how all these issues seem to be benefitting the Aussies.
    Not to worry though, they assure us it won't happen again...
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,633
    edited 11:24AM
    This bowling attack cannot bowl consistent spells of pressure. Batsmen know if they are ever put under the pump it really won't be for long.
    And what were we thinking bowling Jacks for as many overs as we did?

    Never mind all that I suppose. We'll just smash them to bits when we have bat In hand.
    McCullum showing the kind of tactical prowess akin to Karel Fraeye!
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,278
    killerandflash said:
    England losing a review for a blatant error by the Snicko operator makes this even more ridiculous. At least we should have the review back.
    I think they should suspend using "snicko". It has shown to be unreliable with "spikes" not matching audio. It was clear as day that Carey got a touch on that ball.....where else did the noise (and there "spike") come from ? Ball was nowhere near his pads or body.

    Absolute joke.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,866
    Looks like Fox have rolled there own tech on this, where Sky and others have got Hawkeye in to run the system properly 
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,483
    Addick Addict said:
    Rumours that Steve Smith is ill and is going to miss the Test. They've all come from Australians though by all accounts. 
    He's suffering from 'I should still be captain itis'
  • kinveachyaddick
    kinveachyaddick Posts: 3,958
    How many was Carey on when he nicked it?
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,980
    edited 12:14PM
    kinveachyaddick said:
    How many was Carey on when he nicked it?
    70 odd but with a new batter at the other end
  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,483
    As with VAR, the 'Snickogate' controversy shows that reliance on technology, the 'computer says no' syndrome is still far from satisfactory.
    If memory serves this is not the first instance of 'snickoitis' in this series. Wasn't there an issue with a Crawley dismissal ?  (or not lol)
  • North Lower Neil
    North Lower Neil Posts: 23,112
    Lincsaddick said:
    As with VAR, the 'Snickogate' controversy shows that reliance on technology, the 'computer says no' syndrome is still far from satisfactory.
    If memory serves this is not the first instance of 'snickoitis' in this series. Wasn't there an issue with a Crawley dismissal ?  (or not lol)
    Jamie Smith.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,980
    Lincsaddick said:
    As with VAR, the 'Snickogate' controversy shows that reliance on technology, the 'computer says no' syndrome is still far from satisfactory.
    If memory serves this is not the first instance of 'snickoitis' in this series. Wasn't there an issue with a Crawley dismissal ?  (or not lol)
    This one is human error though rather than just the frames not lining up. It should have been so obvious to spot

  • Sponsored links:



  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,420
    Latest betting:

    Australia - 1.51 (66%)
    England - 3.60 (28%)
    Draw - 15.50 (6%)




  • DubaiAddickted
    DubaiAddickted Posts: 56
    what's the best option for extended (60min?) highlights? Found a couple of shorter 15min highlights packages...but can't seem to find anything more substantial.
  • Steven81
    Steven81 Posts: 1,049
    DubaiAddickted said:
    what's the best option for extended (60min?) highlights? Found a couple of shorter 15min highlights packages...but can't seem to find anything more substantial.
    Couldn't find you an hour one but managed 32mins 

    https://youtu.be/Rjc4ApHEU10?si=Ou6oREtzSwSQTikO
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 40,420
    fenaddick said:
    Lincsaddick said:
    As with VAR, the 'Snickogate' controversy shows that reliance on technology, the 'computer says no' syndrome is still far from satisfactory.
    If memory serves this is not the first instance of 'snickoitis' in this series. Wasn't there an issue with a Crawley dismissal ?  (or not lol)
    This one is human error though rather than just the frames not lining up. It should have been so obvious to spot
    They were using TNT's "special" feed. The one that tells you what's happened in advance of the action.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,403
    Rothko said:
    Looks like Fox have rolled there own tech on this, where Sky and others have got Hawkeye in to run the system properly 
    How have they been allowed to do this? surely one of the bodies must decide?
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,494
    Re Snickogate, I've never seen that kind of sound profile (extended multi-part noise) for a simple thin nick. I'm really not sure the sound was bat on ball
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,980
    cantersaddick said:
    Rothko said:
    Looks like Fox have rolled there own tech on this, where Sky and others have got Hawkeye in to run the system properly 
    How have they been allowed to do this? surely one of the bodies must decide?
    The TV broadcaster provides everything for DRS, Fox have a deal with Snicko while most of the rest of the world use Ultra Edge. There were issues with it when they hosted India last year too
  • DubaiAddickted
    DubaiAddickted Posts: 56
    Steven81 said:
    DubaiAddickted said:
    what's the best option for extended (60min?) highlights? Found a couple of shorter 15min highlights packages...but can't seem to find anything more substantial.
    Couldn't find you an hour one but managed 32mins 

    https://youtu.be/Rjc4ApHEU10?si=Ou6oREtzSwSQTikO
    Fantastic! Cheers, mate
  • arny23394
    arny23394 Posts: 1,260
    Use of ultra edge should be compulsory - it is a far better system. 

Categories

“Marketplace”