Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Olympic Stadium; our day in court

1104105106107108110»

Comments

  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 22,111
    Some people just can’t help themselves. 
    It’s pathetic mate 
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,047
    I think it is wrong to accuse Coe. He wanted the stadium to be the national athletics stadium.
    Why let facts get in the way of a good old political rant?
    Yes but those willing to absolve the guilty are just as bad. Facts in this case shouldn't be viewed as political. The main culprit is not in parliament.
    Off with their head's then 🪓 
    Only if corruption annoys you. If you are happy with it fine. 
    Obviously the deal that WHU ended up with stinks to high heaven.
    No doubt some brown envelopes were exchanged somewhere down the line.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 48,211
    I think it is wrong to accuse Coe. He wanted the stadium to be the national athletics stadium.
    Why let facts get in the way of a good old political rant?
    Yes but those willing to absolve the guilty are just as bad. Facts in this case shouldn't be viewed as political. The main culprit is not in parliament.
    Off with their head's then 🪓 
    Only if corruption annoys you. If you are happy with it fine. 
    Obviously the deal that WHU ended up with stinks to high heaven.
    No doubt some brown envelopes were exchanged somewhere down the line.
    Yes, the political element is irrelevent, only that those indulging it it need to have power. That is why I corrected an accusation against Coe who is a Conservative. You have corrupt people in power of all colours but we should be able to call it out when we see it.
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,405
    ross1 said:
    According to the Mayor of London, London taxpayers will have to pay £2.5m if West Ham relegated
    I don't understand this comment by SK. Are West Ham currently paying £5m pa rent at the moment or am I missing something else. 
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,284
    redman said:
    ross1 said:
    According to the Mayor of London, London taxpayers will have to pay £2.5m if West Ham relegated
    I don't understand this comment by SK. Are West Ham currently paying £5m pa rent at the moment or am I missing something else. 
    Less, I'm pretty sure, but @PragueAddick will know for sure.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,526
    redman said:
    ross1 said:
    According to the Mayor of London, London taxpayers will have to pay £2.5m if West Ham relegated
    I don't understand this comment by SK. Are West Ham currently paying £5m pa rent at the moment or am I missing something else. 
    Less, I'm pretty sure, but @PragueAddick will know for sure.
    Actually it is pretty close. Stu will be thinking of the starting level rent which was just £2m'ish, but gradually after a lot of pressure it has been squeezed up to £4.6m p.a. Credit for that goes to Lyn Garner who succeeded David Goldstone,  who was CEO of the LLDC at the time the original deal was done. She was appointed by Sadiq Khan and by that time the Moore Stephens inquiry which laid bare the fiasco of the deal had been published. Goldstone was a weasel who tried to discredit both the BBC documentary, and Steve Clarke and I by suggesting we had "secretly" submitted a different FOI request which demanded sight of the stadium plans. I mean, the whole point of FOI is to make things un-secret, and why would we need the stadium plans? Dan Roan at the BBC, himself put under pressure by Goldstone, tipped me off about that and I have fondly preserved the written apology I wrung from Goldstone. 

    Lyn Garner had the business brain and the cojones to face down Brady and make them pay more. That was no easy task because the LLDC had very little leverage. Trouble is it still did not and does not cover the annual expenses incurred by West Ham's tenancy, still less ongoing maintenance and renovation costs. One of the clauses which was retained was the relegation clause which stipulates a 50% reduction in rent. That more or less covers SK's £2.5m assertion, and is the main reason for it.

    The Athletic has a more than decent summary of the situation here, which hopefully is not paywalled. (though I am certain that the refit cost is £323m and not £272m as they say, I know where the difference comes from but would need time to dig it out) Another thing I didn't know about, mentioned elsewhere, is that they are trying to persuade West Ham to co -operate so that London can hold the 2029 World Athletics Championship, which take place in September that year. The unintentional LOL headline of the article is "West Ham urged to show ‘heart and soul’ over London 2029 World Athletics bid". That's how much leverage we have. Well Brady's gone, but you can take it from me Daniel Kretinsky is not well known in Prague for his "heart and soul" either🤣
  • letthegoodtimesroll
    letthegoodtimesroll Posts: 11,347
    edited May 22


    They seem to do well on the business rates side as well 
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 48,211
    Leicester could do with their expenses going down 50% now they have been relegated to League One. I fail to see how West Hams relegation, if it is them and not Spurs, is the fault of tax payers.
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 30,262
    West Ham will make an announcement next Tuesday on season ticket renewals. West Ham Interim CEO Karim Virani and Ticketing Director Nicola Key told the FAB that season ticket prices will be frozen if West Ham make the great escape and retain Premier League status on Sunday.  

    A final decision on Championship season ticket pricing will be made next week whether that be a freeze or make a slight reduction.  The Championship has 23 home games, four more than the Premier League so price per game would reduce by 17.38% even if prices are only frozen from last season.