Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

World Cup 2026 - USA/Canada/Mexico

1717274767791

Comments

  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 38,599
    Gonna overreact but we look so much more energetic and fresh going into this than previous teams.

    No Phillips or Henderson bollocks here.

    Anderson and Rice are class 
    Anderson is such a clutch player, does the dirty shit but looks forward all the time
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 22,143
    Ark at them having a fecking picnic by the corner flag, WTAF? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 16,373
    Ark at them having a fecking picnic by the corner flag, WTAF? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    Only in America would you have what looked like a Burger King next to the corner flag 
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 7,929
    Can tell there is competition in the squad. Players pressing like this is the actual tournament. 


  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 12,401
    Fucking hell Anderson is a good player isn’t he. 
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 22,143
    Ark at them having a fecking picnic by the corner flag, WTAF? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    Only in America would you have what looked like a Burger King next to the corner flag 
    Strange, because they’re not known for being big eaters out there 
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 12,401
    edited June 10
    Anthony Gordon to Barcelona and I’m now all in on it 
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 9,078
    Solly’s had enough! 
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 9,078
    This is fab!
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 38,599
    These are shit but so are Ghana and Panama. We look decent.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 7,929
    Echoing all the above. 

    Anderson is just a superb footballer. I remember watching him alongside Scott for the U21’s. 

    You could see the talent.
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 16,373
    We really look up for it.

    our midfield 3 are absolutely superb

    wide men both playing well, lots of pressure to perform out there with the talent sitting on the bench 
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 27,864
    Great goal. Good work by Barca’s Gordon 🤩
    Never quite understood Southgate’s reluctance to use Gordon - a left-footed winger on the left.
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,968
    Pickfords ball distribution as shocking as ever
  • Gisappointed
    Gisappointed Posts: 1,250
    bobmunro said:
    Mametz said:
    fenaddick said:
    Mametz said:
    Normally I look forward to the World Cup finals but not this time. Why has the USA got it again so soon after having it before? Why has it been expanded to so many teams? Extended half times, so as to pack in as much advertising revenue as possible. Etc, etc, etc. 

    I really can’t be arsed to watch this overblown farce.
    So soon? It's been 32 years!! For reference, the shortest gap is 16 years (Mexico 1970 & 1986). Germany was also 32 years
    Mametz said:
    Normally I look forward to the World Cup finals but not this time. Why has the USA got it again so soon after having it before? Why has it been expanded to so many teams? Extended half times, so as to pack in as much advertising revenue as possible. Etc, etc, etc. 

    I really can’t be arsed to watch this overblown farce.
    Much as I disagree with another totalitarian 😉 state like the USA being given most of the world cup, it's Mexico's third bite of the apple, the last being only sixteen years after the first. 
    Thanks for both of your replies. 

    I can accept that the America’s have right to host the World Cup, given the enthusiasm of the fans and the success of teams such as Brazil, Argentina and Uruguayan in previous World Cups. But the USA? It is not one of the two most popular sports in that country. It may be 32 years since The USA hosted the tournament but it is 36 years since Italy, three times winners, hosted the tournament, 44 years since Spain, former winners, have hosted the tournament and 60 years since England, former winners, hosted the tournament. In all of those countries there is greater enthusiasm for football than the USA. 


    I get your point but they rotate the tournament across different continents and you can't host a world cup in North America without the US involved.

    The last 5 world cups have been Africa, South America, Europe, Asia and now North America.
    In that case, shouldn't it go to Australia?  There is no rule at FIFA - only money counts.
    I don't think Australia has enough suitable stadiums to host it. 
    Utter bollocks. The MCG is one of the biggest stadia in the world. Sydney not much smaller. 

    Half a dozen over 50k. 

    The MCG and SCG are huge but not ideal for football unless it's Aussie Rules.

    But there are half a dozen other NRL and RU stadiums with 50k plus.
    Wembley used to have a speedway and dog track between the pitch and the crowd. I think at least one was partly replaced with turf but it was never a spectators idyl. 
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 58,942
    These are shit but so are Ghana and Panama. We look decent.
    These are not sh*t, they are proper sh*t. Just hope we get through without an injury. 

    Ghana will be a much different test 
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 9,078
    Madueke 🫣
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 12,401
    Oh dear Noni. What a ball Bellingham though
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 7,929
    You don’t want to be doing that when Saka is your competition.
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 16,373
    Laddick01 said:
    You don’t want to be doing that when Saka is your competition.
    Exactly, no good laughing about it mate - you’ve gotta finish that 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 7,929
    The ball looks very floaty. 

    Rice, Bellingham and even Kane with very uncharacteristic efforts.
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 12,401
    See I know the commentators said no penalty and whilst it was touch and go, I don’t think that’s what VAR is for.

    It’s meant for I be for clear and obvious errors. Not debatable decisions 
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 58,942
    Wasn’t a penalty though, can’t argue with that. 
  • iainment
    iainment Posts: 8,236
    Isn’t it good to watch England without that godawful band playing. And no drummers!
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 16,373
    CAFC Bexley flag behind the goal 
  • Good view just now of the Bexley Charlton flag.
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 7,929
    The amount of tactical fouls this friendly has had is funny.
  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 21,761
    bobmunro said:
    Mametz said:
    fenaddick said:
    Mametz said:
    Normally I look forward to the World Cup finals but not this time. Why has the USA got it again so soon after having it before? Why has it been expanded to so many teams? Extended half times, so as to pack in as much advertising revenue as possible. Etc, etc, etc. 

    I really can’t be arsed to watch this overblown farce.
    So soon? It's been 32 years!! For reference, the shortest gap is 16 years (Mexico 1970 & 1986). Germany was also 32 years
    Mametz said:
    Normally I look forward to the World Cup finals but not this time. Why has the USA got it again so soon after having it before? Why has it been expanded to so many teams? Extended half times, so as to pack in as much advertising revenue as possible. Etc, etc, etc. 

    I really can’t be arsed to watch this overblown farce.
    Much as I disagree with another totalitarian 😉 state like the USA being given most of the world cup, it's Mexico's third bite of the apple, the last being only sixteen years after the first. 
    Thanks for both of your replies. 

    I can accept that the America’s have right to host the World Cup, given the enthusiasm of the fans and the success of teams such as Brazil, Argentina and Uruguayan in previous World Cups. But the USA? It is not one of the two most popular sports in that country. It may be 32 years since The USA hosted the tournament but it is 36 years since Italy, three times winners, hosted the tournament, 44 years since Spain, former winners, have hosted the tournament and 60 years since England, former winners, hosted the tournament. In all of those countries there is greater enthusiasm for football than the USA. 


    I get your point but they rotate the tournament across different continents and you can't host a world cup in North America without the US involved.

    The last 5 world cups have been Africa, South America, Europe, Asia and now North America.
    In that case, shouldn't it go to Australia?  There is no rule at FIFA - only money counts.
    I don't think Australia has enough suitable stadiums to host it. 
    Utter bollocks. The MCG is one of the biggest stadia in the world. Sydney not much smaller. 

    Half a dozen over 50k. 

    The MCG and SCG are huge but not ideal for football unless it's Aussie Rules.

    But there are half a dozen other NRL and RU stadiums with 50k plus.
    Wembley used to have a speedway and dog track between the pitch and the crowd. I think at least one was partly replaced with turf but it was never a spectators idyl. 

    The old Wembley was iconic - but not a great football stadium.
  • PrincessFiona
    PrincessFiona Posts: 5,843
    Am sure I'm not the only one to see/comment on this - just seen a Charlton flag behing the Costa Rica goal
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 35,909
    Am sure I'm not the only one to see/comment on this - just seen a Charlton flag behing the Costa Rica goal
    Not really news. What will be news is when you see a Costa Rica flag behind a Charlton goal  😀