++Charlie Kelman signs on a 4 year deal++

DamoNorthStand

Will score 20 in league 1 next season for us.

Dazzler21

£50 Says we don't go down. (To the upbeats)

Diebythesword

Fantastic goalscorer and can create chances on his own. If we played better football he’d be 20 goal a season. 

Scoham

Garrymanilow said:

Zulu said:

Kelamity Man isnt the answer - how many goals has he scored in between his (numerous) injuries? Really dont get the love-in.

I knew as soon as I saw this that Kelman was going to get a goal next time he played. Whenever a player gets a criminally overwritten, shit nickname like this karma has no choice but to respond

We need to give similar nicknames to the entire team to try to turn this form around.

mendonca

Lovely finish. 

Am going to avoid reading the post-match thread.

crookester

Thought he played really well. Really good finish for his goal and was a pain in the neck for them all game. Just wish the rest of the team turned up.

Henry Irving

Martin Kelman, father of Charlie, in the museum yesterday and the Covered End today. Would have had a perfect view of his son's goal.

Over from the US, he also popped in the Royal Oak pre-game.

 

Ferryman

8 goals from 20 Championship starts ain't too shabby, especially considering how extremely disjointed the 20 starts have been. Give him a decent run loved his movement today 

DubaiCAFC

Thought was one of best performances for us. Looked sharp, and dangerous. Hope can be consistent and run of games 

Crispywood

played the equivalent of 19 (90min) matches at championship level and has 8 goals not a bad return. Arguably the player that would benefit the most from Jones going 

grumpyaddick

Every time Kelman scores he gets dropped.

It's bewildering. 

fenaddick

grumpyaddick said:

Every time Kelman scores he gets dropped.

It's bewildering. 

I've just been thinking about how NJ might set up on Saturday and Kelman's going to be unlucky again isn't he? He'll park the bus and need Leaburn's height as an out ball, Kelman might get half an hour off the bench but I equally wouldn't be surprised to see NJ gamble on Mbick's size instead. 

wmcf123

fenaddick said:

grumpyaddick said:

Every time Kelman scores he gets dropped.

It's bewildering. 

I've just been thinking about how NJ might set up on Saturday and Kelman's going to be unlucky again isn't he? He'll park the bus and need Leaburn's height as an out ball, Kelman might get half an hour off the bench but I equally wouldn't be surprised to see NJ gamble on Mbick's size instead. 

I’d give them a chance to play together .  Not sure what you do with Tyreece but that’s for Jones to work out 

LargeAddick

fenaddick said:

grumpyaddick said:

Every time Kelman scores he gets dropped.

It's bewildering. 

I've just been thinking about how NJ might set up on Saturday and Kelman's going to be unlucky again isn't he? He'll park the bus and need Leaburn's height as an out ball, Kelman might get half an hour off the bench but I equally wouldn't be surprised to see NJ gamble on Mbick's size instead. 

Best form of defence is attack. We are all expecting to lose anyway so this is a free hit as it were, two up top and take the game to them. I’d rather lose 4-1 having a go than defend for 90+ and lose anyway.

NabySarr

LargeAddick said:

fenaddick said:

grumpyaddick said:

Every time Kelman scores he gets dropped.

It's bewildering. 

I've just been thinking about how NJ might set up on Saturday and Kelman's going to be unlucky again isn't he? He'll park the bus and need Leaburn's height as an out ball, Kelman might get half an hour off the bench but I equally wouldn't be surprised to see NJ gamble on Mbick's size instead. 

Best form of defence is attack. We are all expecting to lose anyway so this is a free hit as it were, two up top and take the game to them. I’d rather lose 4-1 having a go than defend for 90+ and lose anyway.

I’d rather defend for 90 and get a result like we did last season. If we try and have a go then I think it would be worse than 4-1 the way Boro are playing at the moment. They’re the best team in the league and the worst thing you can do is go at them the way they play 

Crispywood

wmcf123 said:

fenaddick said:

grumpyaddick said:

Every time Kelman scores he gets dropped.

It's bewildering. 

I've just been thinking about how NJ might set up on Saturday and Kelman's going to be unlucky again isn't he? He'll park the bus and need Leaburn's height as an out ball, Kelman might get half an hour off the bench but I equally wouldn't be surprised to see NJ gamble on Mbick's size instead. 

I’d give them a chance to play together .  Not sure what you do with Tyreece but that’s for Jones to work out 

Play Kelman up top don’t get the best of TC but you get a goal scorer.

Play Leaburn you don’t get a goalscorer but get the best of TC. 

Play Leaburn + Kelman you get a good balance up top but don’t get the best of TC because he’s stuck at LWB.

442 seems like the best solution but when you don’t have a RM nor centre mids who can manage games in a 3 let alone a 2 there’s no real solution 

sam3110

Okonkwo
Ramsay Jones Koumetio Mesík 
Rankin-Costello Coventry Mwamba 
Kelman Leaburn Campbell

Play in a lopsided 433/442 with Campbell wider than Leaburn and Kelman, and JRC wider than Coventry and Mwamba. Out of possession would look more like 

Okonkwo

Ramsay Jones Koumetio Mesík 

Rankin-Costello Coventry Mwamba Campbell

Leaburn
Kelman

Chunes

LargeAddick said:

fenaddick said:

grumpyaddick said:

Every time Kelman scores he gets dropped.

It's bewildering. 

I've just been thinking about how NJ might set up on Saturday and Kelman's going to be unlucky again isn't he? He'll park the bus and need Leaburn's height as an out ball, Kelman might get half an hour off the bench but I equally wouldn't be surprised to see NJ gamble on Mbick's size instead. 

Best form of defence is attack. We are all expecting to lose anyway so this is a free hit as it were, two up top and take the game to them. I’d rather lose 4-1 having a go than defend for 90+ and lose anyway.

Yeah, but we can't attack.