Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
Me too - I have to sit down more now when I go to a comedy club.
Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
It's okay if some quarters say it is. That's really the length and breadth of it.
People really struggle with the subjectivity of comedy. I mean, some people find Miranda funny
There is a fine play called ‘Comedians’ that is thought provoking and explores the nature of comedy. The play may seem a bit dated now but it is very good.
Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
It's okay if some quarters say it is. That's really the length and breadth of it.
People really struggle with the subjectivity of comedy. I mean, some people find Miranda funny
Comedians ultimately become stale - nobody will remain in the public eye forever. JD had a good run.
If he was back on TV how much of an audience would he attract?
Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.
Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.
Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?
Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
I saw Gervais last year and three fights broke out in the audience at different times due to protesters.
Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.
Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?
Lol nobody is dictating anything, I'm expressing an opinion without being personal or pissy.
Jim might be a highly intelligent human being, with nuanced opinions about global issues. But he doesn't express them or come across like that on his podcast while talking about army's of foreigners over here taking jobs and money.. moaning about woke cows at the Council that pulled his show from Torquay.
Not too offended by his jokes, “I took the wife out last night; one punch! Is funny.... until you know he was done for domestic abuse.
Comedy is very much down to the individual. I recall loving Monty Python and my dad couldn't understand why it was funny. I love Karl Pilkington and Ricky Gervais whilst others don't. I always loved Bottom but I appreciate you have to get yourself into that space. Stand up is quite challenging now. I went to a comedy night a couple of months ago with a lot of comedians and only one was really funny for me.
One thing we all know is that comedy evolves over time. What was funny, in many cases, 40 or 50 years ago is less so now. Watching comedy from the 30s, most of it is not funny (Except Laurel and Hardy who were geniuses). But we can look at Charlie Chaplin films and see his talent but not have too many laughs.
There is still an audience who like Davison's humour but of course it is getting increasingly smaller. But I think that is true for a lot of comedy. Davison looked like he was going to achieve what Bradley Walsh has done, both were/are good at presenting, very good. The thing about Walsh is he clearly tries not to be controversial and maybe because of this is more likeable to many. Mind you, Ant and Dec are likeable but I can't stand them. I appreciate I am in the minority there.
That was the exact situation in my house. I remember him looking at me and just shaking his head. I mean, how can the hairdresser's expedition to Mount Everest not be funny?
Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.
Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?
But that’s the point, he’s not taking the piss out of people with learning difficulties. In Gervais’ own words:
“People mistake the subject of a joke with the actual target.”
My view is the “older” comedians don’t differentiate between the two.
Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen.
It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to.
How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.
Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen.
It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to.
How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.
Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.
Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.
Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?
But that’s the point, he’s not taking the piss out of people with learning difficulties. In Gervais’ own words:
“People mistake the subject of a joke with the actual target.”
My view is the “older” comedians don’t differentiate between the two.
Yeah I've heard these weird explanations a few times and I completely get what they're saying, but answer this - why do they never use the same logic and tell racist jokes?
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen.
It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to.
How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.
Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.
I think this where the term "the silent majority" comes from.
Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen.
It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to.
How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.
Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.
As the old political adage says; "beware the silent majority".
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the population
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the population
I'm guessing you meant Tory voters. So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.
*Edit just noticed you took out the Tory voter bit.
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the population
I'm guessing you meant Tory voters. So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.
The article actually says 40 something % were Labour voters, although it's very confusing as it also says 83% were tory voters.
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the population
How would you know?
All surveys are based upon samples; you can't ask everyone in the country, as you know full well.
OK, I give up. You KNOW that you're right, and who am I to question your infallible powers of being able to mind read the entire population. If the entire developing world decides to move to the UK, then everyone will be fine with it, I'm sure.
I for one, can't wait to be culturally enriched. Living in the 3rd world will be 'vibrant' and edgy, that's for sure. Just don't complain when the immigrants decide that the country is a bit too progressive for their liking and decide on a return to the iron age.
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the population
I'm guessing you meant Tory voters. So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.
The article actually says 40 something % were Labour voters.
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the population
How would you know?
All surveys are based upon samples; you can't ask everyone in the country, as you know full well.
OK, I give up. You KNOW that you're right, and who am I to question your infallible powers of being able to mind read the entire population. If the entire developing world decides to move to the UK, then everyone will be fine with it, I'm sure.
I for one, can't wait to be culturally enriched. Living in the 3rd world will be 'vibrant' and edgy, that's for sure. Just don't complain when the immigrants decide that the country is a bit too progressive for their liking and decide on a return to the iron age.
My opinion is correct to me, as its my opinion... at no point have I started to get petulant to other posters. It's a forum, we share opinions or its just an echo chamber.
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the population
I'm guessing you meant Tory voters. So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.
The article actually says 40 something % were Labour voters.
As I said you took out the Tory voter bit.
I removed it because I realised I was starting to be a arsehole and labelling a whole group, which Is kinda scummy.
It certainly is. Perhaps those who'd like to may wish to use that facility to discuss the pros and cons of migration, leaving this thread free to discuss one of our local comedic talents.
Comments
More red than pink.
People really struggle with the subjectivity of comedy. I mean, some people find Miranda funny
JD had a good run.
If he was back on TV how much of an audience would he attract?
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?
Jim might be a highly intelligent human being, with nuanced opinions about global issues. But he doesn't express them or come across like that on his podcast while talking about army's of foreigners over here taking jobs and money.. moaning about woke cows at the Council that pulled his show from Torquay.
Not too offended by his jokes, “I took the wife out last night; one punch! Is funny.... until you know he was done for domestic abuse.
My view is the “older” comedians don’t differentiate between the two.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.
*Edit just noticed you took out the Tory voter bit.
All surveys are based upon samples; you can't ask everyone in the country, as you know full well.
OK, I give up. You KNOW that you're right, and who am I to question your infallible powers of being able to mind read the entire population. If the entire developing world decides to move to the UK, then everyone will be fine with it, I'm sure.
I for one, can't wait to be culturally enriched. Living in the 3rd world will be 'vibrant' and edgy, that's for sure. Just don't complain when the immigrants decide that the country is a bit too progressive for their liking and decide on a return to the iron age.
Don't say you weren't warned:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/17/hamtramck-michigan-muslim-council-lgbtq-pride-flags-banned