Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Jim Davidson...
Comments
-
Gribbo said:
Do you wear your pink chinos?bobmunro said:
Me too - I have to sit down more now when I go to a comedy club.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
More red than pink.
1 -
It's okay if some quarters say it is. That's really the length and breadth of it.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
People really struggle with the subjectivity of comedy. I mean, some people find Miranda funny
5 -
There is a fine play called ‘Comedians’ that is thought provoking and explores the nature of comedy. The play may seem a bit dated now but it is very good.1
-
Miranda - I laughed more the last time stubbed my toe.1
-
Comedians ultimately become stale - nobody will remain in the public eye forever.Big_Bad_World said:
It's okay if some quarters say it is. That's really the length and breadth of it.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
People really struggle with the subjectivity of comedy. I mean, some people find Miranda funny
JD had a good run.
If he was back on TV how much of an audience would he attract?1 -
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.5 -
Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..shine166 said:
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?8 -
I saw Gervais last year and three fights broke out in the audience at different times due to protesters.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.1 -
Lol nobody is dictating anything, I'm expressing an opinion without being personal or pissy.Gribbo said:
Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..shine166 said:
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?
Jim might be a highly intelligent human being, with nuanced opinions about global issues. But he doesn't express them or come across like that on his podcast while talking about army's of foreigners over here taking jobs and money.. moaning about woke cows at the Council that pulled his show from Torquay.
Not too offended by his jokes, “I took the wife out last night; one punch! Is funny.... until you know he was done for domestic abuse.
0 -
That was the exact situation in my house. I remember him looking at me and just shaking his head. I mean, how can the hairdresser's expedition to Mount Everest not be funny?MuttleyCAFC said:Comedy is very much down to the individual. I recall loving Monty Python and my dad couldn't understand why it was funny. I love Karl Pilkington and Ricky Gervais whilst others don't. I always loved Bottom but I appreciate you have to get yourself into that space. Stand up is quite challenging now. I went to a comedy night a couple of months ago with a lot of comedians and only one was really funny for me.
One thing we all know is that comedy evolves over time. What was funny, in many cases, 40 or 50 years ago is less so now. Watching comedy from the 30s, most of it is not funny (Except Laurel and Hardy who were geniuses). But we can look at Charlie Chaplin films and see his talent but not have too many laughs.
There is still an audience who like Davison's humour but of course it is getting increasingly smaller. But I think that is true for a lot of comedy. Davison looked like he was going to achieve what Bradley Walsh has done, both were/are good at presenting, very good. The thing about Walsh is he clearly tries not to be controversial and maybe because of this is more likeable to many. Mind you, Ant and Dec are likeable but I can't stand them. I appreciate I am in the minority there.0 - Sponsored links:
-
I loved the expedition to build a bridge between both peaks!1
-
I think Jim's son used to post on here.0
-
But that’s the point, he’s not taking the piss out of people with learning difficulties. In Gervais’ own words:Gribbo said:
Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..shine166 said:
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?“People mistake the subject of a joke with the actual target.”
My view is the “older” comedians don’t differentiate between the two.2 -
How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.shine166 said:Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen.
It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.
14 -
Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.bigstemarra said:
How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.shine166 said:Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen.
It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.20 -
Yeah I've heard these weird explanations a few times and I completely get what they're saying, but answer this - why do they never use the same logic and tell racist jokes?WSS said:
But that’s the point, he’s not taking the piss out of people with learning difficulties. In Gervais’ own words:Gribbo said:
Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..shine166 said:
The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here.Gribbo said:Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it".
They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.
Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.
I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?“People mistake the subject of a joke with the actual target.”
My view is the “older” comedians don’t differentiate between the two.
0 -
Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
7 -
I think this where the term "the silent majority" comes from.Croydon said:
Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.bigstemarra said:
How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.shine166 said:Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen.
It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.6 -
As the old political adage says; "beware the silent majority".Croydon said:
Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.bigstemarra said:
How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.shine166 said:Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen.
It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to.
JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial. Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.
Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough. In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.
Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.0 - Sponsored links:
-
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the populationbigstemarra said:Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.2 -
Admittedly this is turning into HOC chat now1
-
I'm guessing you meant Tory voters.shine166 said:
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the populationbigstemarra said:Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.
*Edit just noticed you took out the Tory voter bit.0 -
The article actually says 40 something % were Labour voters, although it's very confusing as it also says 83% were tory voters.southamptonaddick said:
I'm guessing you meant Tory voters.shine166 said:
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the populationbigstemarra said:Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.2 -
How would you know?shine166 said:
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the populationbigstemarra said:Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
All surveys are based upon samples; you can't ask everyone in the country, as you know full well.
OK, I give up. You KNOW that you're right, and who am I to question your infallible powers of being able to mind read the entire population. If the entire developing world decides to move to the UK, then everyone will be fine with it, I'm sure.
I for one, can't wait to be culturally enriched. Living in the 3rd world will be 'vibrant' and edgy, that's for sure. Just don't complain when the immigrants decide that the country is a bit too progressive for their liking and decide on a return to the iron age.
Don't say you weren't warned:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/17/hamtramck-michigan-muslim-council-lgbtq-pride-flags-banned
4 -
As I said you took out the Tory voter bit.shine166 said:
The article actually says 40 something % were Labour voters.southamptonaddick said:
I'm guessing you meant Tory voters.shine166 said:
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the populationbigstemarra said:Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.0 -
My opinion is correct to me, as its my opinion... at no point have I started to get petulant to other posters. It's a forum, we share opinions or its just an echo chamber.bigstemarra said:
How would you know?shine166 said:
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the populationbigstemarra said:Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
All surveys are based upon samples; you can't ask everyone in the country, as you know full well.
OK, I give up. You KNOW that you're right, and who am I to question your infallible powers of being able to mind read the entire population. If the entire developing world decides to move to the UK, then everyone will be fine with it, I'm sure.
I for one, can't wait to be culturally enriched. Living in the 3rd world will be 'vibrant' and edgy, that's for sure. Just don't complain when the immigrants decide that the country is a bit too progressive for their liking and decide on a return to the iron age.
Don't say you weren't warned:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/17/hamtramck-michigan-muslim-council-lgbtq-pride-flags-banned2 -
@bigstemarra - what's the majority view? (Or your notion of what it is, anyway?)0
-
I removed it because I realised I was starting to be a arsehole and labelling a whole group, which Is kinda scummy.southamptonaddick said:
As I said you took out the Tory voter bit.shine166 said:
The article actually says 40 something % were Labour voters.southamptonaddick said:
I'm guessing you meant Tory voters.shine166 said:
'Two 3rds of people', what does that mean ? How many were asked ? It's certainly not 2/3 of the populationbigstemarra said:Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673
'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.
You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia. Surprising, I know.
So what you're saying is no Labour voters, for instance, agree the levels of migration are too high.1
This discussion has been closed.
