Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Jim Davidson...

1234568

Comments

  • shine166 said:
    Admittedly this is turning into HOC chat now 
    It certainly is. Perhaps those who'd like to may wish to use that facility to discuss the pros and cons of migration, leaving this thread free to discuss one of our local comedic talents. 
  • Gribbo said:
    WSS said:
    Gribbo said:
    shine166 said:
    Gribbo said:
    Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it". 

    They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.

    Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.

    I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
    The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here. 
    Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..

    BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?
    But that’s the point, he’s not taking the piss out of people with learning difficulties. In Gervais’ own words:

    “People mistake the subject of a joke with the actual target.”

    My view is the “older” comedians don’t differentiate between the two.
    Yeah I've heard these weird explanations a few times and I completely get what they're saying, but answer this - why do they never use the same logic and tell racist jokes?
     

    Because that would be racist.

    But you can tell jokes about race without being racist.
  • shine166 said:
    Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen. 

    It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to. 

    Re your final comment I think there is more to it than that.
  • Croydon said:
    shine166 said:
    Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen. 

    It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to. 
    How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.

    JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial.  Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.

    Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough.  In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.

    Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.



    Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.

    Tens of thousands are f***** off with the situation.  Jimbo says it how it is.
    He seems pretty obsessed with it.
  • Croydon said:
    shine166 said:
    Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen. 

    It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to. 
    How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.

    JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial.  Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.

    Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough.  In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.

    Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.



    Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.

    Tens of thousands are f***** off with the situation.  Jimbo says it how it is.
    He seems pretty obsessed with it.

    I'd say he was concerned.
  • Think it's been exposed today the sham lawyers directing them too. No doubt when JD mentions crooked lawyers the usual will say its fine and attack him. 
  • Croydon said:
    shine166 said:
    Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen. 

    It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to. 
    How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.

    JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial.  Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.

    Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough.  In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.

    Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.



    Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.

    Tens of thousands are f***** off with the situation.  Jimbo says it how it is.
    He seems pretty obsessed with it.

    I'd say he was concerned.
    Numerous tedious ramblings on his YouTube channel.
  • Top bloke Jim, no time for this ultra woke nonsense. If you don’t like his comedy, simple, don’t listen! 
    'Ultra woke' ???
  • Sponsored links:


  • Croydon said:
    shine166 said:
    Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen. 

    It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to. 
    How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.

    JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial.  Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.

    Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough.  In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.

    Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.



    Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.

    Tens of thousands are f***** off with the situation.  Jimbo says it how it is.
    He seems pretty obsessed with it.

    I'd say he was concerned.
    Numerous tedious ramblings on his YouTube channel.
    You say tedious, tens of thousands will agree with him.
    I appreciate we are all entitled to our own opinion.
  • Here you go, from the far-right rag that is the Independent:

    https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-migration-too-high-government-defends-stop-the-boats-record-2385673

    'Two thirds of people think levels of migration to the UK are too high, a new poll for i has revealed'.

    You're right, most of the people I know aren't credulous and aren't too keen on their patch turning into a mini-Karachi or Somalia.  Surprising, I know.

    Bang on the money again. Don't get derailed by the dozen or so here that appose your view. In the real world it is as you say... 
  • Croydon said:
    shine166 said:
    Not bothered by his jokes, it's his personal opinions about other human beings that make him a wrongen. 

    It's great that he's supported the military over the years, but he should have the intelligence to know that people dont travel across the globe to live on a boat and claim £60 a week unless they really need to. 
    How do they need to? They are already in a safe country in which they can claim asylum, i.e France.

    JD simply reflects the majority view, it is not controversial.  Maybe he has the intelligence to realise that if you have an out of date immigration system that reflects a different age which makes it almost impossible to say no to any Tom, Dick or Harry, then that will be exploited by economic migrants (not that I blame them and I certainly understand their wish for a better life with better prospects), when it is supposed to be for genuine asylum cases.

    Yes, they may have to live on a boat or whatever for a while, but they'll get citizenship soon enough.  In the unlikely case that they are denied asylum, they will simply disappear into the black economy - the chances of them being found and deported are slim; I'm sure that JD has the intelligence to realise that, as do most people.

    Whatever you think of JD, at least he's not credulous.



    Might be the majority view within your circle, but I don't think that's mirrored by the rest of the population.

    Tens of thousands are f***** off with the situation.  Jimbo says it how it is.
    He seems pretty obsessed with it.

    I'd say he was concerned.
    Numerous tedious ramblings on his YouTube channel.
    You say tedious, tens of thousands will agree with him.
    I appreciate we are all entitled to our own opinion.
    Just making the point that he goes on about this stuff ad infinitum - all a bit tedious. Needs to work on his material...
  • I thought he was a great presenter for Generation Game and Big Break. Not a fan of his comedy but can see how it would appeal to certain folk
  • Some of his stories are pretty funny, especially (ive posted it before so won't do it again) when he got stopped by the police and breathalysed but wasn't driving.

    my dad had his sinderella pantomime on video. I remember my parents were out so I watched it (aged 11 ish), it was great for an 11 year old in 1990. His material and attitude hasn't moved with the times and I wouldn't watch him now.

    my top three comedians now

    jimmy carr, so good at dealing with hecklers 
    Jack Whitehall, just a funny guy
    frank skinner, doesn't swear
    Saw him a week or so ago at the O2. 

    Very disappointing. Not what I expected. 
  • Big Break was pukka.

    Some of his views and comedy now seem very dated but we seem to have this discussion about him on multiple threads every 6 months. I don’t know why people seem to get so wound up by him, he’s not the forefront of celebrity news, just ignore him.
  • Big Break was pukka.

    Some of his views and comedy now seem very dated but we seem to have this discussion about him on multiple threads every 6 months. I don’t know why people seem to get so wound up by him, he’s not the forefront of celebrity news, just ignore him.
    Someone else brought him up on this thread, saying "He's back". I sent a joke response, other people said "like him or loath him, he's a good comedian" and it took from there. 

    He's a Charlton fan and thus a person of interest. It's a football forum and we can choose to comment or not. There we have it
  • PaddyP17 said:
    Big Break was pukka.

    Some of his views and comedy now seem very dated but we seem to have this discussion about him on multiple threads every 6 months. I don’t know why people seem to get so wound up by him, he’s not the forefront of celebrity news, just ignore him.
    Someone else brought him up on this thread, saying "He's back". I sent a joke response, other people said "like him or loath him, he's a good comedian" and it took from there. 

    He's a Charlton fan and thus a person of interest. It's a football forum and we can choose to comment or not. There we have it
    Yeah fair, it’s just the same convo over again tho. Seems pointless to me but hey ho.
  • Danepak said:
    Argh, wasn’t going to comment on this thread, but here we go:

    FYI, I think that far too often, people are quick to pull the race card.
    And I’m saying this being brown skinned myself (half Danish, half Pakistani).

    However, regarding Jim Davidson, I don’t know if he’s racist or not, but here’s my observation, as I’ve been the same room as him once.
    It was up at Watford in 2007 (2-2 draw). I had a pre-match pint in a boozer (don’t remember which one).
    I stood there by myself, having a pint and minded my own business.

    From a distance I could see Jim Davidson staring at me in disgust.
    I hadn’t done anything, hadn’t said anything, hadn’t tried to communicate with him.
    But he sent me a look, which felt a bit like ‘f*ckin Paki!’.
    I might have been overly sensitive, but it was weird.

    I had a look around the pub and to me it looked like it was only me he had an issue with being there. I was also the only non-white in there from what I could see.

    A bit of a bizarre experience and trust me, I’m the last one to pull the race card, but when you add some of the stuff up that he says, then it does make you wonder.


    :( I’m sorry this happened to you 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Danepak said:
    Argh, wasn’t going to comment on this thread, but here we go:

    FYI, I think that far too often, people are quick to pull the race card.
    And I’m saying this being brown skinned myself (half Danish, half Pakistani).

    However, regarding Jim Davidson, I don’t know if he’s racist or not, but here’s my observation, as I’ve been the same room as him once.
    It was up at Watford in 2007 (2-2 draw). I had a pre-match pint in a boozer (don’t remember which one).
    I stood there by myself, having a pint and minded my own business.

    From a distance I could see Jim Davidson staring at me in disgust.
    I hadn’t done anything, hadn’t said anything, hadn’t tried to communicate with him.
    But he sent me a look, which felt a bit like ‘f*ckin Paki!’.
    I might have been overly sensitive, but it was weird.

    I had a look around the pub and to me it looked like it was only me he had an issue with being there. I was also the only non-white in there from what I could see.

    A bit of a bizarre experience and trust me, I’m the last one to pull the race card, but when you add some of the stuff up that he says, then it does make you wonder.


    It was the Wetherspoon in the High st, I was in there too
  • Danepak said:
    Argh, wasn’t going to comment on this thread, but here we go:

    FYI, I think that far too often, people are quick to pull the race card.
    And I’m saying this being brown skinned myself (half Danish, half Pakistani).

    However, regarding Jim Davidson, I don’t know if he’s racist or not, but here’s my observation, as I’ve been the same room as him once.
    It was up at Watford in 2007 (2-2 draw). I had a pre-match pint in a boozer (don’t remember which one).
    I stood there by myself, having a pint and minded my own business.

    From a distance I could see Jim Davidson staring at me in disgust.
    I hadn’t done anything, hadn’t said anything, hadn’t tried to communicate with him.
    But he sent me a look, which felt a bit like ‘f*ckin Paki!’.
    I might have been overly sensitive, but it was weird.

    I had a look around the pub and to me it looked like it was only me he had an issue with being there. I was also the only non-white in there from what I could see.

    A bit of a bizarre experience and trust me, I’m the last one to pull the race card, but when you add some of the stuff up that he says, then it does make you wonder.


    Sorry to derail the thread, so you are named after being Danish and Pakistani, rather than bacon? :) 
  • McBobbin said:
    Danepak said:
    Argh, wasn’t going to comment on this thread, but here we go:

    FYI, I think that far too often, people are quick to pull the race card.
    And I’m saying this being brown skinned myself (half Danish, half Pakistani).

    However, regarding Jim Davidson, I don’t know if he’s racist or not, but here’s my observation, as I’ve been the same room as him once.
    It was up at Watford in 2007 (2-2 draw). I had a pre-match pint in a boozer (don’t remember which one).
    I stood there by myself, having a pint and minded my own business.

    From a distance I could see Jim Davidson staring at me in disgust.
    I hadn’t done anything, hadn’t said anything, hadn’t tried to communicate with him.
    But he sent me a look, which felt a bit like ‘f*ckin Paki!’.
    I might have been overly sensitive, but it was weird.

    I had a look around the pub and to me it looked like it was only me he had an issue with being there. I was also the only non-white in there from what I could see.

    A bit of a bizarre experience and trust me, I’m the last one to pull the race card, but when you add some of the stuff up that he says, then it does make you wonder.


    Sorry to derail the thread, so you are named after being Danish and Pakistani, rather than bacon? :) 
    Yep, I thought it was an obvious one to use (and I do love a bit of Danepak bacon too, although you can’t get in in NZ.
  • Gribbo said:
    WSS said:
    Gribbo said:
    shine166 said:
    Gribbo said:
    Wonder what the people who don't like JD think of Gervais, Carr, Boyle etc, constantly using cancer, paedophilia and disability in their material? Generally, just by merely saying you don't find it funny, you're immiately told that it is, in fact, very funny, but you just "don't get it". 

    They're all still in regular work, even though they constantly "offend" people. Mainly because, I think, the people they do offend don't shout and ball about it.

    Remember, when asked on his Desert Island Discs, Jimmy Carr saying that the only subject he wouldn't joke about was the Hillsborough disaster. I don't think he was being completely honest, even if its only because he wouldn't get any work again.

    I personally don't find JD funny as a comedian. Maybe the odd thing he's come out with has made me chuckle, but I struggle with most stand up comedy as I get older.
    The thing is, Boyle and Gervais are clever people and you know that a joke... is a joke and not a personal opinion, which has been pointed out many times on here. 
    Sorry for not keeping up on what's what mate. Gotta be honest, I generally avoid getting into these types of debates these days and leave to you lot to dictate what the rest of us are allowed to think..

    BTW, who's the arbiter on which comedian is clever enough to take the piss out of people with learning difficulties and what's the benchmark of cleverness to be considered by the arbiter?
    But that’s the point, he’s not taking the piss out of people with learning difficulties. In Gervais’ own words:

    “People mistake the subject of a joke with the actual target.”

    My view is the “older” comedians don’t differentiate between the two.
    Yeah I've heard these weird explanations a few times and I completely get what they're saying, but answer this - why do they never use the same logic and tell racist jokes?
     

    https://youtube.com/shorts/ltWkZPmoIgo?feature=share 
  • Billy is a poor man's Plum. 
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!