The issue with VAR is when you have a referee this much of a diva. Even if you told him in his ear he was wrong he would ignore you and stick with his decision.
Surprise surprise you defend VAR even when it looks like it got it wrong.
Sorry who gave the decision?
They are two seperate things though. You're blaming the ref for both. The penalty was soft, probably the wrong decision. He is not in control of VAR though is he?
VAR have to give the benefit of the doubt when it's not an obvious error.
They didn't stop play and tell ref to give the penalty.
You defended VAR by saying the ref would have ignored them anyway. Where's your proof for that? How often has a referee ignored what VAR has said to them?
A referee gives the worst decision in the tournament by a country mile, you decide to bash VAR anyway.
Nice to see refs are given a pass to make terrible decisions because it's the big bad VAR's fault they can't use their eyes.
The issue with VAR is when you have a referee this much of a diva. Even if you told him in his ear he was wrong he would ignore you and stick with his decision.
You would defend Var regardless of how shite a decision they make
The issue with VAR is when you have a referee this much of a diva. Even if you told him in his ear he was wrong he would ignore you and stick with his decision.
Surprise surprise you defend VAR even when it looks like it got it wrong.
Sorry who gave the decision?
They are two seperate things though. You're blaming the ref for both. The penalty was soft, probably the wrong decision. He is not in control of VAR though is he?
VAR have to give the benefit of the doubt when it's not an obvious error.
They didn't stop play and tell ref to give the penalty.
You defended VAR by saying the ref would have ignored them anyway. Where's your proof for that? How often has a referee ignored what VAR has said to them?
A referee gives the worst decision in the tournament by a country mile, you decide to bash VAR anyway.
Nice to see refs are given a pass to make terrible decisions because it's the big bad VAR's fault they can't use their eyes.
I haven't said anything of the sort. VAR has a big advantage over the referees, they should use that. Live I was about 75% sure it wasn't a pen so yes, it was a poor decision. After the replay, I was 100% sure it wasn't. Therefore VAR had the better position but didn't use it.
Regardless, you defended VAR by saying the referee would have ignored them anyway, I noticed you ignored my previous questions. Mainly because you're chatting shite.
The issue with VAR is when you have a referee this much of a diva. Even if you told him in his ear he was wrong he would ignore you and stick with his decision.
Surprise surprise you defend VAR even when it looks like it got it wrong.
Sorry who gave the decision?
They are two seperate things though. You're blaming the ref for both. The penalty was soft, probably the wrong decision. He is not in control of VAR though is he?
VAR have to give the benefit of the doubt when it's not an obvious error.
They didn't stop play and tell ref to give the penalty.
You defended VAR by saying the ref would have ignored them anyway. Where's your proof for that? How often has a referee ignored what VAR has said to them?
A referee gives the worst decision in the tournament by a country mile, you decide to bash VAR anyway.
Nice to see refs are given a pass to make terrible decisions because it's the big bad VAR's fault they can't use their eyes.
The issue with VAR is when you have a referee this much of a diva. Even if you told him in his ear he was wrong he would ignore you and stick with his decision.
You would defend Var regardless of how shite a decision they make
The issue with VAR is when you have a referee this much of a diva. Even if you told him in his ear he was wrong he would ignore you and stick with his decision.
You would defend Var regardless of how shite a decision they make
Comments
Nice to see refs are given a pass to make terrible decisions because it's the big bad VAR's fault they can't use their eyes.
It's just then about fitting the player to the right club. Nego has clearly found a better fit in Hungary than he did in London.
Regardless, you defended VAR by saying the referee would have ignored them anyway, I noticed you ignored my previous questions. Mainly because you're chatting shite.
Germany 0-1 Hungary
As it stands:
1. France (vs Switzerland)
2. Hungary (vs England)
3. Germany (vs Belgium)
4. Portugal (knocked out)
Luckily able to be overturned this time.