Is it just me??? A few days ago people on here were laying into the bloke left right and centre...now he's been nicked it's all, "Ah poor little spanner has been picked on by the filfth..."
No one was seriously suggesting he should be punished (other than for his barnet) were they?!?!
The lads involved in the fisticuffs sure - bang to rights, but what he did was nothing more than silly.
Feel sorry for the silly twat if anything. Most lads who do silly drunken things like that on a Sat night don't have the footage all over the tv and in the nationals for their family/friends and work to see.
Saw the footage on the other site earlier - some pissed up people in the middle of all that. Fighting over rows of seats is full of trip hazards though !
Forget the haircut on the guy who lifted the police hat - check out "Jamie Sanderson sports writer for the metro's" hair! That is outrageous - is he working for free?
Forget the haircut on the guy who lifted the police hat - check out "Jamie Sanderson sports writer for the metro's" hair! That is outrageous - is he working for free?
I recognise the third and fourth ones on the top. They are the judges on masterchef. And the second guy was the gay ginger one from the full monty. I'll get my trusty pitch fork out and knock on their doors.
Forget the haircut on the guy who lifted the police hat - check out "Jamie Sanderson sports writer for the metro's" hair! That is outrageous - is he working for free?
hahaha looks like he's got a christmas pudding on his head
The law regarding theft includes, I believe, 'intention to permanently deprive', which if he even slung it into a 'meat wagon' would mean that he is not guilty of theft. The haircut on the other hand....
No, that would be a split infinitive, use of which would be a hanging offence :-) The Act says "with the intention of permanently depriving". So, if he took it, and his actions - hiding it under his jacket for example - made it clear that he meant to steal it but later changed his mind, he would still have had the initial intention of stealing it and a prosecution might succeed.
LOL!! You beat me to it Oak. I'd just copied the address line to post here and there it was at the end of the thread, his ugly boat looking at me. I'm sure in some parts of the World that look is technically illegal ;P
@Kent_red, quality find m8, post of the week hands down )
Wasn't he on sesame street or the muppet show? If not, he should have been. That is a grade A frizz cake and gormless face combo. Take a bow son, take a bow - you look truly ridiculous.
we've got a bloke at work who looks so ridiculous that I can't look at him without laughing -we've even got a full size picture of his face on a stick purely for amusement and chuckle inducement and the picture above is having a similar affect on me
Wasn't he on sesame street or the muppet show? If not, he should have been. That is a grade A frizz cake and gormless face combo. Take a bow son, take a bow - you look truly ridiculous.
Lol he does look like he should be on The Muppet Show! Great shout.
I'd imagine that's him, I work with his brother and he's from Hither Green. Don't know what's going on but was told he returned the hat on getting calls about being caught live on tv.
Spoke to a Millwall fan I know yesterday who is the type that would avoid trouble if at all possible, yet even he trotted out the reasons why the media are making too much out of this.
"just a bit of self policing, if the police are not there then those that are have to do it for them. Then when the police finally turn up they cause more trouble than they are worth."
Comments
The lads involved in the fisticuffs sure - bang to rights, but what he did was nothing more than silly.
Feel sorry for the silly twat if anything. Most lads who do silly drunken things like that on a Sat night don't have the footage all over the tv and in the nationals for their family/friends and work to see.
http://metro.co.uk/2013/04/19/police-release-images-of-10-millwall-fans-wanted-over-fa-cup-violence-3653711/
I bet he's a right one with the burds.
The Act says "with the intention of permanently depriving". So, if he took it, and his actions - hiding it under his jacket for example - made it clear that he meant to steal it but later changed his mind, he would still have had the initial intention of stealing it and a prosecution might succeed.
@Kent_red, quality find m8, post of the week hands down
"just a bit of self policing, if the police are not there then those that are have to do it for them. Then when the police finally turn up they cause more trouble than they are worth."