2nd Ashes Test at Lords
Comments
-
Why are you complaining, I'm sure you used that 15 minutes well estimating the size of the away support. ;-)oohaahmortimer said:
No sign of the Queen and apparently she left after an hour .... Well worth the 15 minute delayA-R-T-H-U-R said:
Yeah, because you've never had a reign delayed start to a match before.oohaahmortimer said:11.15am start I hear because the Queen is being introduced to the teams
Anyone. Know how that affects the sessions
Surely she could have got up 15 mins earlier rather than making us all fry in the sun
Hope you enjoyed the marvellous reception and atmoshpere.0 -
right ... Lords here I come .. hope the M11 is not its usual snarled self at the London end and I get into town before 5 o'clock this evening. It'll sure be a long drive in this heat ..... chauffeur ... turn up the ac and the radio0
-
Have a great day!Lincsaddick said:right ... Lords here I come .. hope the M11 is not its usual snarled self at the London end and I get into town before 5 o'clock this evening. It'll sure be a long drive in this heat ..... chauffeur ... turn up the ac and the radio
0 -
I think we cocked it up yesterday. It was Australia's day for sure. I'm surprised the Aussies weren't playing more leggies, however crap. Essex's Tom Craddock tore through England, and he isn't all that good.
I still can't believe Broad gets a nightwatchman!
We need at least another 100 runs, and I can't see it happening, unless Swann "does an Agar".0 -
I always like the second day of a Test - in theory you should see both teams bat and all is still up in their air regarding the direction of the match.0
-
many thanks K a Fkillerandflash said:
Have a great day!Lincsaddick said:right ... Lords here I come .. hope the M11 is not its usual snarled self at the London end and I get into town before 5 o'clock this evening. It'll sure be a long drive in this heat ..... chauffeur ... turn up the ac and the radio
0 -
England 5/4 ish Aussies 5/2 ish
Can't see that think its an evenly balanced test0 -
McBobbin said:
I still can't believe Broad gets a nightwatchman!
Damned if they did, damned if they don't. If Broad had gone out to bat and lasted an over then everyone would be wondering why a nightwatchman wasn't used. As it was the new ball was taken and hopefully Anderson will hang around for a few overs.
0 -
Bresnan c Haddin b Harris 7 1st ball of the day.0
-
The guy chosen for his batting. Just leaving the office for a corporate day at Lords with one of the broadcasters. Looks like I will have a day of watching the Aussies smash us round the park. Thats a 400+ wicket there.0
- Sponsored links:
-
0
-
Anderson c Haddin b Harris 12
5 wickets for Harris.
England 313-9.0 -
The proof of Bresnan's pudding should be in his bowling. It's not as if Finn is a great batsman.
I'd settle for 350 now. Don't expect it.0 -
happy with this considering the start we had. Up to broad and swann now to take the momentum away from the aussies a bit and score some quick runs.0
-
Cracking cameo from the last wicket pair...0
-
a few more overs of this and England are back in business0
-
On the one hand these runs are welcome...but we'll have to bowl on this wicket soon.0
-
Siddle and Pattinson combined are 0 - 166. If someone did not know the score would think we were 500 - 20
-
361 All Out0
-
361 All Out.
I'd have taken that this morning.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Agree. A bit short, but I've given up making predictions this series, and both sets of batsmen have been suicidal.BlackForestReds said:361 All Out.
I'd have taken that this morning.0 -
This series is building up to be a cracker, as both teams have moments of brilliance and moments where they throw it all away, so there's been very few days when one team is completely dominant.0
-
we have good bowlers I have faith in them0
-
I ate it...Lincsaddick said:
what ?????????? .. come on tell allsoapy_jones said:If we get 320 I'll eat my...
0 -
I hope Lincs made it in time.0
-
Not if he left Lincs at 8am. Bumble said yesterday, there was a queue at 8am from St Johns Wood stn to the ground.LenGlover said:I hope Lincs made it in time.
0 -
No, on the line is a No Ball. Part of the foot raised or flat must be behind the crease.BlackForestReds said:
The whole of the front foot must be over the line when the foot lands.red_murph said:I'm watching without sound at work. Just saw the replay and his heel looked on the line?! What is the rule with no balls?
0 -
42-1 at lunch
Watson lbw Bresnan 300 -
And a waste of a review...0
-
Anyone know any bars in the City showing the ashes with tv's outside? Ta.0