Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

A proportionate protest - Charlton v Ipswich *Stand Up For The 2%*

1121315171824

Comments

  • edited November 2015

    stonemuse said:

    Not a chance Henry, she's too arrogant and believes she knows better than us.

    I don't think she does.

    She's just unwilling to admit that she needs help.

    "Imposter syndrome" is common in new managers and in particular female managers.

    She needs help but she feels that admitting that would show weakness. In fact, it would be the opposite.
    Exactly, and she believes RD will also think she is weak ...not forgetting that she believes it would weaken her CV.

    I fully agree, such an approach would be far from weakness and, in fact, would show great initiative and confidence. The best managers work with the best of their staff and become even better themselves.
  • THEMCA said:

    Who the fuck is anyone to tell me to find another club. I was at Derby, MK and Birmingham away and have a season ticket and get told to support this or find another club. I'm not even blaming the result on the protest but I'll say it again, it doesn't help he team.

    The football is secondary to a lot of people now I'm afraid, and I don't blame them.
  • seth plum said:

    I went for a gentleman's comfort break in Bartrams at 10.30 and the security were all giving the vibrating wand to the Ipswich guests and directors at the main entrance.
    I don't know who was there to welcome them, but it wasn't Katrien because she arrived for work today at 11.07, and probably didn't even get started until 11.20 after she'd had the vibrating wand treatment too.

    seth plum said:

    I went for a gentleman's comfort break in Bartrams at 10.30 and the security were all giving the vibrating wand to the Ipswich guests and directors at the main entrance.
    I don't know who was there to welcome them, but it wasn't Katrien because she arrived for work today at 11.07, and probably didn't even get started until 11.20 after she'd had the vibrating wand treatment too.

    She probably enjoyed that.
  • seth plum said:

    I went for a gentleman's comfort break in Bartrams at 10.30 and the security were all giving the vibrating wand to the Ipswich guests and directors at the main entrance.
    I don't know who was there to welcome them, but it wasn't Katrien because she arrived for work today at 11.07, and probably didn't even get started until 11.20 after she'd had the vibrating wand treatment too.

    seth plum said:

    I went for a gentleman's comfort break in Bartrams at 10.30 and the security were all giving the vibrating wand to the Ipswich guests and directors at the main entrance.
    I don't know who was there to welcome them, but it wasn't Katrien because she arrived for work today at 11.07, and probably didn't even get started until 11.20 after she'd had the vibrating wand treatment too.

    She probably enjoyed that.
    Genuine question - what on earth is the vibrating wand?
  • edited November 2015

    seth plum said:

    I went for a gentleman's comfort break in Bartrams at 10.30 and the security were all giving the vibrating wand to the Ipswich guests and directors at the main entrance.
    I don't know who was there to welcome them, but it wasn't Katrien because she arrived for work today at 11.07, and probably didn't even get started until 11.20 after she'd had the vibrating wand treatment too.

    seth plum said:

    I went for a gentleman's comfort break in Bartrams at 10.30 and the security were all giving the vibrating wand to the Ipswich guests and directors at the main entrance.
    I don't know who was there to welcome them, but it wasn't Katrien because she arrived for work today at 11.07, and probably didn't even get started until 11.20 after she'd had the vibrating wand treatment too.

    She probably enjoyed that.
    Genuine question - what on earth is the vibrating wand?
    Metal detector, scanner thing.

    Good to see there were quite a few around me stood up singing.
  • Sponsored links:


  • I printed off some posters and held mine up at 2 minutes. I gave a couple to some other people to hold up, but very few in the Lower West near me had posters and I heard quite a few calls from some that suggested they weren't in favour of the protest.
  • cafctom said:

    Glad it came across better on TV than it did in the ground.

    I was stood up with a mate and felt as though I was the only one singing directly around me. Very awkward.

    Well done to the organiser though, just a shame that we do have quite a worrying number of fans who seemingly don't care or don't have the bottle to participate.

    .....or aren't part of the 2%?
    Just a thought.

    Better to accuse them of not having the 'bottle' to stand up for a minute.
    Jeez
  • kentred2 said:

    All that energy, all that enthusiasm, all those skills, all the unpaid commitment.

    Wouldn't it be great if the CEO could utilise it all, if she'd work with those fans, really work with them, not pay lip service to the idea.

    What an asset that would be to the club.

    Your choice Katrien. Swallow your pride and accept some help.

    None of us can help with the basic gap which is knowledge of professional football. For that Charlton need a new owner, a new CEO, a new manager and some experienced players.
    No, you're wrong. Quite a few fans know about running a football club and one in particular.
    Wait, is the aim of this protest to get the club to employ(re-employ in some cases) certain fans in high up positions?
    No, not at all.

    I was refuting the claim that fans have no knowledge of how to run a football club.
  • cafctom said:

    Glad it came across better on TV than it did in the ground.

    I was stood up with a mate and felt as though I was the only one singing directly around me. Very awkward.

    Well done to the organiser though, just a shame that we do have quite a worrying number of fans who seemingly don't care or don't have the bottle to participate.

    .....or aren't part of the 2%?
    Just a thought.

    Better to accuse them of not having the 'bottle' to stand up for a minute.
    Jeez
    They must enjoy us losing every other game by 0-3 whilst having their intelligence insulted then.
  • se9addick said:

    se9addick said:

    se9addick said:

    razil said:

    STs not turning up doesnt make much difference, visual demos, food/ merch strike will hurt

    Course it will. By sitting in your seat it gives the impression you are consenting to the way the club is being run regardless of whether you hold a poster up for a minute or not. Boycotting sends the message bluntly and is more blatant than turning up and not buying hot dogs.

    Attending is enabling them to carry on with the current strategy as it is.
    I reckon the attendance is 8/9,000 in home areas today, I don't think an organised boycott would really take those numbers down much more.
    Well if that is the case and 8000 are happy with the way things are then I really fear for the future under this current lot. We'll be a Millwall that can't win derbies.
    I'm not sure that going to a football match automatically equals approving of the way the club is being run
    Well it certainly doesn't equal dissaproval
    But lots of people who went to the game today managed to show their disapproval...
    And it was forgotten about and not mentioned by the 3rd minute. If those protesting hadn't turned up that's a 90 minute protest that is much more impacting and meaningful as the club knows how hard it is to stay away for fans so would speak volumes and they may actually address things.

    Today's protest could occur at every match for the rest of the season and will make very little difference unfortunately despite the commendable and admirable best efforts of those involved.
    The protest hasn't been forgotten though, it still being discussed.

    It has been picked up by the media. It will continue as long a fans are willing to act.

    Whose talking about your personal boycott? Have the media interviewed you? Has KM mentioned your boycott?

    No? Well of course not because it is invisable to everyone. The club don't know if you are boycotting or just not coming. If they do know that isn't embarrassing them in public. Other fans cant see it like they can the black and white scarves.

    The CEO isn't being giving leaflets in the streets about your person boycott and won't have to respond as she did in today's programme.

    That's not digging you out as any genuine boycott where someone is choosing not to come when otherwise they would be attending is laudable but by its nature it is invisable.

    Spell It Out is just 6 weeks old. It is not perfect, it won't please everyone as I said at the very beginning but it is something.

    It might be that there will need to be more actions, more protests, different avenues of attack and one of those could be a walk out or a boycott but why go for the nuclear option from day one.


    Joe @ Addickted2TheReds has done a great job and a lot of fans stepped up to leaflet today. Well done to everyone who helped in whatever way. They are the true spirit of Charlton.

    The fight goes on. Nothing has been won yet. The CEO has to deliver on the promises she made as a result of Spell It Out and the car park protests. The CEO has to do a lot more and a lot better so keep the pressure up.
    All fair points and I'm not criticising anyone at all for what they did I just fear that it won't be enough and will be too late before they change if they will ever change at all. Easy for me to not go and say what people have done is not enough though from the comfort of my settee. It's just really frustrating because as I said on the post match thread it doesn't need to be like this and they could be the best post Curbishley board so easily if they chose too amend the "our way or nothing approach."
  • seth plum said:

    I went for a gentleman's comfort break in Bartrams at 10.30 and the security were all giving the vibrating wand to the Ipswich guests and directors at the main entrance.
    I don't know who was there to welcome them, but it wasn't Katrien because she arrived for work today at 11.07, and probably didn't even get started until 11.20 after she'd had the vibrating wand treatment too.

    seth plum said:

    I went for a gentleman's comfort break in Bartrams at 10.30 and the security were all giving the vibrating wand to the Ipswich guests and directors at the main entrance.
    I don't know who was there to welcome them, but it wasn't Katrien because she arrived for work today at 11.07, and probably didn't even get started until 11.20 after she'd had the vibrating wand treatment too.

    She probably enjoyed that.
    Genuine question - what on earth is the vibrating wand?
    It's a bit like a Rampant Rabbit only more magical.
  • Sponsored links:


  • It was a bit disappointing but unsurprising from my seat in the West Upper.

    (cue West Stand Upper jokes .... I sat in the Covered End until six or seven years ago when I moved to give my kids a better view of the game. Next season I feel a move elsewhere may be in order)

    Olympic Stadium??
  • Worth more than a promote or a flag from troll :smiley:
  • edited November 2015

    It was a bit disappointing but unsurprising from my seat in the West Upper. A handful of people held the sheets up while remaining sitting down. My 15 year old and I stood up throughout the second minute but it seemed like only a few in the surrounding rows joined in.

    Meanwhile one of the blokes behind us called us f***ing wankers and to sit down and tried to goad me with a "yeah mate I'm talking about you". (I didn't bite, somehow)

    Was good to see the rest of the ground join in but the apathy around me was even worse than I feared.

    (cue West Stand Upper jokes .... I sat in the Covered End until six or seven years ago when I moved to give my kids a better view of the game. Next season I feel a move elsewhere may be in order)

    Apart from the unpleasantness around me, well done to all and in particular to Joe - but everyone connected in any form today deserves congratulations. As do the majority of those who may have disagreed but didn't resort to calling their fellow fans rude names!

    TBH, the fans least likely to protest, sing, stand up or do anything, likely sit in the Upper West.

    I've sat in the West for some cup games and even then, you get outraged looks if you dare to sing or shout out.


  • Its certainly true that a large number of fans turn up on a match day, watch the game, go home and their next involvement is the next home game. They don't care who runs or owns the Club, just so long as there is one. That is their prerogative. A fair number also think that we should be grateful for RD and if he hadn't saved where would we be.

    On another note, when leaving the East Stand today there were a number of 'leaflets' strewn around in the colours of the Belgian flag with the message 'time to go home' on them. Seems like someone else isn't too happy.
  • Slight aside, but do people feel that the atmosphere and clientele in the East and West are significantly different?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!