New 5 Year Kit Deal With Hummel (Away Kit Revealed, pg.19)
Comments
-
My guess is they put the Betdaq too low on these and had to remove and raise. They probably didn't have enough at the time not to do this. Just a theory.Chris_from_Sidcup said:
The only thing i don't like about it is the slightly different shades on the front. Why is there a lighter rectangle area below the Betdaq logo?Rufus is a dogs name said:
4 -
Does anyone know this?AFKABartram said:Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?
0 -
yes I believe you doAFKABartram said:
Does anyone know this?AFKABartram said:Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?
0 -
If anyone tells you, they'll get pelters for still being members of Valley Gold...AFKABartram said:Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?
9 -
If you do it will mean your child's kit will only cost a bargain £60 rather than £67!AFKABartram said:
Does anyone know this?AFKABartram said:Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?
3 -
I'm impressed that they, also, voided that temptation to increase the prices. Most of the Premier League clubs are asking for c. £55 for a shirt this season. I note they all seem to change every season now as well, where as it used to be every other season.0
-
Well, we are a League One club. If they could shift them for £70 they would charge £70.0
-
Good job I've got twins... :-(se9addick said:
If you do it will mean your child's kit will only cost a bargain £60 rather than £67!AFKABartram said:
Does anyone know this?AFKABartram said:Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?
2 -
Hmm how are they gonna fit the names on the back in that tiny gap!?Callumcafc said:Shirts looking nice with the numbers printed on them.
0 -
I feel your pain brotherAFKABartram said:
Good job I've got twins... :-(se9addick said:
If you do it will mean your child's kit will only cost a bargain £60 rather than £67!AFKABartram said:
Does anyone know this?AFKABartram said:Do you still get a Valley Gold discount?
1 -
Sponsored links:
-
anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?4
-
Elthamaddick said:
anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?
8 -
East Kent Addicks, SE7 Valiants & @Henry Irving only I'm afraidElthamaddick said:anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?
6 -
There was a competition on the website and facebook page to win an invite for tonight. The competition said winners would be draw by 5pm yesterday, but as of now there is no news on the website or facebook page about it. So I'm guessing I didn't win, but it would have been nice to know that they actually did a draw and who did win it.0
-
NorthStandUltra just confirmed who the winners were...randy andy said:There was a competition on the website and facebook page to win an invite for tonight. The competition said winners would be draw by 5pm yesterday, but as of now there is no news on the website or facebook page about it. So I'm guessing I didn't win, but it would have been nice to know that they actually did a draw and who did win it.
5 -
Supposed to be 10 winners, more cut-backs from the club lolForeverAddickted said:
NorthStandUltra just confirmed who the winners were...randy andy said:There was a competition on the website and facebook page to win an invite for tonight. The competition said winners would be draw by 5pm yesterday, but as of now there is no news on the website or facebook page about it. So I'm guessing I didn't win, but it would have been nice to know that they actually did a draw and who did win it.
https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/596c741c8c4c2/win-the-chance-to-be-at-an-exclusive-preview-of-our-home-kit-for-the-201718-season
1 -
yep. I'm thereElthamaddick said:anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?
1 -
See, told yaHenry Irving said:
yep. I'm thereElthamaddick said:anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?
6 -
If you bump in to Sue, let her go in first, you will then stand a good chance of beating her to the Buffet....Henry Irving said:
yep. I'm thereElthamaddick said:anyone going to the home kit launch tonight then?
23 -
This, with bells on.seth plum said:The protest shirt raised loads of money for charity and costs half the price of the official kit. It is sponsored by a true Charlton fan not a gambling company, was designed by fans and looks better than the official kit.
Until he sells, whether we win every match or not next season, the protest kit is the one to wear, not the one shoved down the throat of innocent fans at a rip off price.
I may be a lone voice but my feeling about the new kit is shove it, including any launches and announcements and such like.
I've always been a bit conflicted by blue Charlton kits, too many echoes of the noisy neighbours versus they often look pretty good. Apart from the socks, this new two-tone away kit looks fine and in almost any other circumstance I could see it being popular. Nobody of wit or conscience should endorse roly's toxic pantomime and buy this or any other merch. The only "Charlton" merch to be seen out in is Protest merch, until the carcinogenic crumbly is out of the picture. As soon as that preposterous pensioner has gone for good, we can all splurge bundles of cash on official Charlton goodies, but not before.
Sad to see another misguided "businessman" has nailed his colours to roly's rotten mast by paying to splash his name across the players' shorts. That's one building firm that won't be looking forward to an upturn in trade locally.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
which building firm is it?StigThundercock said:
This, with bells on.seth plum said:The protest shirt raised loads of money for charity and costs half the price of the official kit. It is sponsored by a true Charlton fan not a gambling company, was designed by fans and looks better than the official kit.
Until he sells, whether we win every match or not next season, the protest kit is the one to wear, not the one shoved down the throat of innocent fans at a rip off price.
I may be a lone voice but my feeling about the new kit is shove it, including any launches and announcements and such like.
I've always been a bit conflicted by blue Charlton kits, too many echoes of the noisy neighbours versus they often look pretty good. Apart from the socks, this new Hummel away kit looks fine and in almost any other circumstance I could see it being popular. Nobody of wit or conscience should endorse roly's toxic pantomime and buy this or any other merch. The only "Charlton" merch to be seen out in is Protest merch, until the carcinogenic crumbly is out of the picture. As soon as that preposterous pensioner has gone for good, we can all splurge bundles of cash on official Charlton goodies, but not before.
Sad to see another misguided "businessman" has nailed his colours to roly's rotten mast by paying to splash his name across the players' shorts. That's one building firm that won't be looking forward to an upturn in trade locally.0 -
Named (shamed) on the OS. I'll not give it the oxygen of publicity here.
0 -
Kids still like the official shirts so suspect they'll sell as many as usual (no idea how many that is), no doubt my two will buy oneStigThundercock said:
This, with bells on.seth plum said:The protest shirt raised loads of money for charity and costs half the price of the official kit. It is sponsored by a true Charlton fan not a gambling company, was designed by fans and looks better than the official kit.
Until he sells, whether we win every match or not next season, the protest kit is the one to wear, not the one shoved down the throat of innocent fans at a rip off price.
I may be a lone voice but my feeling about the new kit is shove it, including any launches and announcements and such like.
I've always been a bit conflicted by blue Charlton kits, too many echoes of the noisy neighbours versus they often look pretty good. Apart from the socks, this new Hummel away kit looks fine and in almost any other circumstance I could see it being popular. Nobody of wit or conscience should endorse roly's toxic pantomime and buy this or any other merch. The only "Charlton" merch to be seen out in is Protest merch, until the carcinogenic crumbly is out of the picture. As soon as that preposterous pensioner has gone for good, we can all splurge bundles of cash on official Charlton goodies, but not before.
Sad to see another misguided "businessman" has nailed his colours to roly's rotten mast by paying to splash his name across the players' shorts. That's one building firm that won't be looking forward to an upturn in trade locally.
I've not bought a shirt for donkeys years so unlikely I'd buy whatever, I quite like blue for away, had many over the years.
The building firm is an interesting one.........0 -
fair enough, just had a look and they will also be on the front of the kids kits.StigThundercock said:Named (shamed) on the OS. I'll not give it the oxygen of publicity here.
are we the only club that have a sponsor on the kids kits when the official sponsor isnt allowed on their shirts ?
0 -
The building firm are involved at the training ground in some capacity I believe.
He's a businessman who is simply trying to get more exposure to his business. Just because you hate the owner doesn't make it right to wish failure upon a business who are trying to make money in very testing times in some areas of the construction industry10 -
West Ham have "The Bobby Moore Foundation" on the front of their kids shirts.cafcdave123 said:
fair enough, just had a look and they will also be on the front of the kids kits.StigThundercock said:Named (shamed) on the OS. I'll not give it the oxygen of publicity here.
are we the only club that have a sponsor on the kids kits when the official sponsor isnt allowed on their shirts ?3 -
fair enough, still think it looks better withoutricky_otto said:
West Ham have "The Bobby Moore Foundation" on the front of their kids shirts.cafcdave123 said:
fair enough, just had a look and they will also be on the front of the kids kits.StigThundercock said:Named (shamed) on the OS. I'll not give it the oxygen of publicity here.
are we the only club that have a sponsor on the kids kits when the official sponsor isnt allowed on their shirts ?0 -
According to ConstructionFinance.com the industry is booming
http://constructionfinance.com/2017/02/07/business-is-booming-for-the-construction-industry/0 -
If they're giving money to fund Roland Duchaletet's deliberate destruction of Charlton Athletic they can't be surprised by any backlash. Do your research before entering a commercial partnership. I highly doubt it was his only option.Swisdom said:The building firm are involved at the training ground in some capacity I believe.
He's a businessman who is simply trying to get more exposure to his business. Just because you hate the owner doesn't make it right to wish failure upon a business who are trying to make money in very testing times in some areas of the construction industry3 -
You'll probably find that they're not funding Roland, at least not directly. Smells of a deal, discount on building costs in exchange for advertising.0
