Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The General Election - June 8th 2017

1269270272274275320

Comments

  • Shami Chakrabarti just said on Question Time that Jeremy Corbyn won the election !

    There are far too many fantasists about. (sorry fantasists no offence intended).

    And the other lady just called May a robot and Corbyn a clown! Why is it I always seem to agree with whoever isn't a politician......
  • edited June 2017
    Edit: Fiiish and I had the same idea and credit to him for putting it more simply.

    Exit poll versus final tally looks very good. By the way, I would expect it to be very good given the sample size of 30k. Not sure where they put the margin of error for the exit poll, but the end result must surely be within it.



  • SDAddick said:

    Edit: Fiiish and I had the same idea and credit to him for putting it more simply.

    Exit poll versus final tally looks very good. By the way, I would expect it to be very good given the sample size of 30k. Not sure where they put the margin of error for the exit poll, but the end result must surely be within it.



    The margin of error was 20 seats so yes well within that.
  • Rob7Lee said:

    Shami Chakrabarti just said on Question Time that Jeremy Corbyn won the election !

    There are far too many fantasists about. (sorry fantasists no offence intended).

    And the other lady just called May a robot and Corbyn a clown! Why is it I always seem to agree with whoever isn't a politician......
    "If you act like a robot, they will elect a clown"

    Political bants.
  • Her bitterness is delicious.
  • Sponsored links:


  • @bobmunro you have to pay a deposit of £500 to stand which would eat into any funds raised
  • Huskaris said:

    Question time is a good one tonight. Shami Chakrabarti seems like she want to meet Isabel Oakeshott in the car park for afters.

    I agree, less labour supportive considering London than I thought it would be.

    ps, I think Isabel would win, she'd get a dirty kick in first....
  • That Isabel Oakeshott is usually so cocky on QT. Tonight she's got a face like a smacked arse.

    She is the most obnoxious individual I have seen in a long time.

    No UKIP on the panel - just as well seeing as they have no MPs and no leader.
  • Saga Lout said:

    That Isabel Oakeshott is usually so cocky on QT. Tonight she's got a face like a smacked arse.

    She is the most obnoxious individual I have seen in a long time.

    Has an opinion for sure, what makes you say obnoxious?
  • I don't think we'll be able to have a public debate for the next 5/10/50 years without some budget Hopkins shouting everyone down. State of our discourse
  • @bobmunro you have to pay a deposit of £500 to stand which would eat into any funds raised

    Yes was aware of that Henners - I was thinking I would stump that up (who knows I may not lose it) so all monies raised would go to the good causes. I'm not not sure about charities and political activity - I've just read some stuff where it says a charity should avoid supporting or endorsing a candidate - but I haven't found anything that would preclude a candidate using the process (invisibly if need be) to raise money.

    More research needed but it may be a runner if it's lawful. Could have some real fun as well.
  • @bobmunro you have to pay a deposit of £500 to stand which would eat into any funds raised

    Create a CL Party, £2 subs each - sorted, including @MuttleyCAFC produced campaign literature...
  • Rob7Lee said:

    Saga Lout said:

    That Isabel Oakeshott is usually so cocky on QT. Tonight she's got a face like a smacked arse.

    She is the most obnoxious individual I have seen in a long time.

    Has an opinion for sure, what makes you say obnoxious?
    Well, the first thing she did was to talk over the Labour representative on the panel, who was too polite to shout her down. She then proceeded to spend the rest of the show defending the Daily Mail, of all things.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Rothko said:

    Osbourne is having way to much fun



    Mfuck osbournevabd call me dave
  • Saga Lout said:

    Rob7Lee said:

    Saga Lout said:

    That Isabel Oakeshott is usually so cocky on QT. Tonight she's got a face like a smacked arse.

    She is the most obnoxious individual I have seen in a long time.

    Has an opinion for sure, what makes you say obnoxious?
    Well, the first thing she did was to talk over the Labour representative on the panel, who was too polite to shout her down. She then proceeded to spend the rest of the show defending the Daily Mail, of all things.
    I saw the first bit, they all do it on there...... .can't say I heard the Daily Mail defence.....
  • bobmunro said:

    @bobmunro you have to pay a deposit of £500 to stand which would eat into any funds raised

    Yes was aware of that Henners - I was thinking I would stump that up (who knows I may not lose it) so all monies raised would go to the good causes. I'm not not sure about charities and political activity - I've just read some stuff where it says a charity should avoid supporting or endorsing a candidate - but I haven't found anything that would preclude a candidate using the process (invisibly if need be) to raise money.

    More research needed but it may be a runner if it's lawful. Could have some real fun as well.
    I genuinely think this is the best thing/proposal/argument I've now read on 272 pages. I'd quite happily be an official donor to the bob Munro party.

    Independents run all the time. I'm now officially backing bob Munro 2022
  • bobmunro said:

    @bobmunro you have to pay a deposit of £500 to stand which would eat into any funds raised

    Yes was aware of that Henners - I was thinking I would stump that up (who knows I may not lose it) so all monies raised would go to the good causes. I'm not not sure about charities and political activity - I've just read some stuff where it says a charity should avoid supporting or endorsing a candidate - but I haven't found anything that would preclude a candidate using the process (invisibly if need be) to raise money.

    More research needed but it may be a runner if it's lawful. Could have some real fun as well.
    I'd be happy to kick in a tenner. Is it legal for a non-citizen non-resident to influence elections there? Are there laws against that? And if so, how do they work? Asking for a friend(ly country).
  • cabbles said:

    bobmunro said:

    @bobmunro you have to pay a deposit of £500 to stand which would eat into any funds raised

    Yes was aware of that Henners - I was thinking I would stump that up (who knows I may not lose it) so all monies raised would go to the good causes. I'm not not sure about charities and political activity - I've just read some stuff where it says a charity should avoid supporting or endorsing a candidate - but I haven't found anything that would preclude a candidate using the process (invisibly if need be) to raise money.

    More research needed but it may be a runner if it's lawful. Could have some real fun as well.
    I genuinely think this is the best thing/proposal/argument I've now read on 272 pages. I'd quite happily be an official donor to the bob Munro party.

    Independents run all the time. I'm now officially backing bob Munro 2022
    Anyone know how we can become registered in the area to vote Bob!?
  • bobmunro said:

    Just been discussing with my son the somewhat eccentric candidates - Lord Bucket Head and Mr Fish Finger to name but two.

    I have decided that at the next election (probably quite soon) I will be standing in Stoke on an independent ticket. The purpose will be to gain sponsors for x per vote gained to raise money as part of my fundraising for Leukemia research and the Anthony Nolan Trust. I'll be sure to let you all know but just wanted to check something in case it's not allowed. It will not be an offensive name and likewise the manifesto will be humorous rather than derogatory so would appear to be acceptable. Anyone see any reason why it wouldn't be allowed?

    If you do it in a 6ft penis costume I will give you £1 per vote.
  • Rob7Lee said:

    cabbles said:

    bobmunro said:

    @bobmunro you have to pay a deposit of £500 to stand which would eat into any funds raised

    Yes was aware of that Henners - I was thinking I would stump that up (who knows I may not lose it) so all monies raised would go to the good causes. I'm not not sure about charities and political activity - I've just read some stuff where it says a charity should avoid supporting or endorsing a candidate - but I haven't found anything that would preclude a candidate using the process (invisibly if need be) to raise money.

    More research needed but it may be a runner if it's lawful. Could have some real fun as well.
    I genuinely think this is the best thing/proposal/argument I've now read on 272 pages. I'd quite happily be an official donor to the bob Munro party.

    Independents run all the time. I'm now officially backing bob Munro 2022
    Anyone know how we can become registered in the area to vote Bob!?
    We can all come and live with him. I bet he'd love it. Then there would be no need for any of us to go on here. We just start discussions round his kitchen table. It would be well worth it. For all of us
  • bobmunro said:

    Just been discussing with my son the somewhat eccentric candidates - Lord Bucket Head and Mr Fish Finger to name but two.

    I have decided that at the next election (probably quite soon) I will be standing in Stoke on an independent ticket. The purpose will be to gain sponsors for x per vote gained to raise money as part of my fundraising for Leukemia research and the Anthony Nolan Trust. I'll be sure to let you all know but just wanted to check something in case it's not allowed. It will not be an offensive name and likewise the manifesto will be humorous rather than derogatory so would appear to be acceptable. Anyone see any reason why it wouldn't be allowed?

    If you do it in a 6ft penis costume I will give you £1 per vote.
    What will you do when he gets erected elected?
  • http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/09/ruth-davidson-planning-scottish-tory-breakaway-challenges-theresa/

    Ruth Davidson is to defy Theresa May’s plans for a hard Brexit and tear her Scottish party away from English control after the UK Tories’ disastrous General Election result.

    Amid a growing clamour among senior Tories in London for Ms Davidson to be given a top position in the UK party, her aides are working on a deal that would see the Scottish party break away to form a separate organisation.
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!