Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Bond, James Bond

145791012

Comments

  • Options
    DA9 said:
    Watch Taboo and revenant and then claim he can’t act, and as Ronnie Kray in Legend....outstanding 

    And whilst I’m here, James Bond should never be anything but a white actor, whole back story would be ruined otherwise, Idris Elba is a fantastic actor, and taken in isolation would suit it, but, there is a whole lot more to consider than just acting, the whole (as mentioned) back story of a white Scottish father and white Swiss mother, plus the Fleming original book illustrations, based on a white character.

    Using the same logic, shaft and othello could be played by white actors, equally ridiculous and wrong in my view.


    Watched em both.
    Could’nt distinguish much difference.
    Same grunts and groans.
    Maybe it’s just me but I find him exactly the same in every role. Mumbling and at times incoherent 🤷‍♀️
    Try Locke, totally different role 
  • Options
    The important thing more than what skin pigmentation the actor has is that they are good. I like Idris Elba, I don't think he's a very good actor at all but he looks the part and that goes a long way. Even if I think he's too much if a unit to play James Bond 

    Its like the whole thing having Jodie Whittaker play doctor who. Whats more important is the programme is good and the last few times I've watched doctor who it has been shite, nothing to do with Jodie Whittaker, the writing is crap and the storylines worse


  • Options
    edited September 2020
    I think with the modern Bond, you have to play it straight. You don't need the greatest acting. Just look like you believe what is going on. Craig was a brilliant Bond IMO. I hate to say it, but probably the best.
  • Options
    I think with the modern Bond, you have to play it straight. You don't need the greatest acting. Just look like you believe what is going on. Craig was a brilliant Bond IMO. I hate to say it, but probably the best.
    Yeah agree I think Daniel Craig is an excellent Bond but he is a really good actor as well. Not that its a necessity like you say for the role 
  • Options
    Would have welcomed idris as Bond but that boat has now sailed. Of the current batch of hopefuls for me it would be Hardy or Norton with no preference. Both fine actors and fit the Bond image. Agree with Muttley that the best Bond has been Daniel Craig and I remember seeing the Connery films “at the pictures” 
  • Options
    I think with the modern Bond, you have to play it straight. You don't need the greatest acting. Just look like you believe what is going on. Craig was a brilliant Bond IMO. I hate to say it, but probably the best.
    Until Craig started, I had never been a fan of Bond films. 

    Skyfall changed it for me, and enjoyed Spectre too.  
  • Options
    Not a fan of Hardy - doesn't suit Bond for me.
  • Options
    stonemuse said:
    I think with the modern Bond, you have to play it straight. You don't need the greatest acting. Just look like you believe what is going on. Craig was a brilliant Bond IMO. I hate to say it, but probably the best.
    Until Craig started, I had never been a fan of Bond films. 

    Skyfall changed it for me, and enjoyed Spectre too.  
    Amazing how opinions differ.

    I've been a huge Bond fan and my love for it has gone massively downhill since Craig has been involved. The worst Bond for me and aside from CR his films (not his fault) just don't feel like Bond films to me. 
  • Options
    cafcpolo said:
    stonemuse said:
    I think with the modern Bond, you have to play it straight. You don't need the greatest acting. Just look like you believe what is going on. Craig was a brilliant Bond IMO. I hate to say it, but probably the best.
    Until Craig started, I had never been a fan of Bond films. 

    Skyfall changed it for me, and enjoyed Spectre too.  
    Amazing how opinions differ.

    I've been a huge Bond fan and my love for it has gone massively downhill since Craig has been involved. The worst Bond for me and aside from CR his films (not his fault) just don't feel like Bond films to me. 
    Yeah I love reading or hearing how different people have vastly different opinions of the same thing. For me the best thing to happen to James Bond films was not better special effects or bigger sets to blow up it was the Bourne films


  • Options
    Agree that Bourne affected Casino Royale, but I still think Skyfall ruined that. 

    The Bond movies have been reacting to other franchises for a long time. For instance, Moonraker came along two years after Star Wars, and True Lies was a big deal a year before Goldeneye came out. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    JiMMy 85 said:
    Agree that Bourne affected Casino Royale, but I still think Skyfall ruined that. 

    The Bond movies have been reacting to other franchises for a long time. For instance, Moonraker came along two years after Star Wars, and True Lies was a big deal a year before Goldeneye came out. 
    Yeah agree, essentially they only have so much source material to go on and that is fairly telegraphic so the quirks and innovation come from following others. 

    One thing you can't not appreciate with any Bond film is how good they look. The sets are gorgeous they always have a funky scene or 7 and its something I appreciate in a big blockbuster, or any film come to that
  • Options
    Bond is pure escapism. It’s what films should be about. 
  • Options
    I know many won't agree, but I thought Spectre was the peak. I say the peak as I can't imagine they can beat that. Great opening leading into the best ever Bond song (fantastic competition) and action and suspense all the way, leading to a great ending. 

    I was hooked as that helicopter scene merged into the opening credits. Craig definitely made a good claim for being the best Bond when I wasn't sure initially. Good luck to Hardy. 
  • Options
    When did Bond changing race/gender etc become a thing? It feels like something the producers put out there every few years for cheap publicity rather than anything they're remotely serious about.
  • Options
    Now confirmed that No Time To Die is pushed back to April 2021
  • Options
    Trailer does look good
  • Options
    Now confirmed that No Time To Die is pushed back to April 2021
    Or whenever a copy gets leaked online.
  • Options
    Now confirmed that No Time To Die is pushed back to April 2021
    Wonder what comes out first a vaccine or this film.
  • Options
    Sunday Times are reporting that all cineworld cinemas are going to close this week until April. Sounds like the delay on the Bond film was the final blow and they’ve decided to go into hibernation.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    They’ll have delayed it for a year out of greed and when they want to release it there will be no cinemas left, ah well....straight to britbox?
  • Options
    If they can't show it by Summer 2021 it will probably have to go on Netflix or somewhere. I wonder how much they will charge to view it!
  • Options
    I watched Layer Cake again last night (what a cracking film).
    Both Craig & Hardy in it & the new Q.
    Couldn't stop laughing at the thought of Hardy being the new Bond. Unless he camps him up? He’d make a great camp Bond.
    Craig really bulked up for Bond didn’t he? But I still find him so one dimensional.

  • Options
    Having read this thread the other day, I decided to watch a Bond film (my very first). It was Skyfall and I thought it was decent. I'm a big fan of the Bourne films but was never interested in James Bond films. This one changed my previous opinion of the franchise.
  • Options
    Jessie said:
    Having read this thread the other day, I decided to watch a Bond film (my very first). It was Skyfall and I thought it was decent. I'm a big fan of the Bourne films but was never interested in James Bond films. This one changed my previous opinion of the franchise.
    One of the best Bond films ever made, definitely in the modern era.
  • Options
    Ross said:
    Jessie said:
    Having read this thread the other day, I decided to watch a Bond film (my very first). It was Skyfall and I thought it was decent. I'm a big fan of the Bourne films but was never interested in James Bond films. This one changed my previous opinion of the franchise.
    One of the best Bond films ever made, definitely in the modern era.
    Pish, it’s no Live and let die is it....
  • Options
    Ross said:
    Jessie said:
    Having read this thread the other day, I decided to watch a Bond film (my very first). It was Skyfall and I thought it was decent. I'm a big fan of the Bourne films but was never interested in James Bond films. This one changed my previous opinion of the franchise.
    One of the best Bond films ever made, definitely in the modern era.
    I noticed it was directed by Sam Mendes who had directed quite a few films I liked very much (Revolutionary Road, Jarhead, Road to Perdition and the recent 1917) so I chose it as my first Bond film. That said, the one after that, Spectre, was also directed by him but the ratings are low so I gave it a miss.
  • Options
    Fumbluff said:
    They’ll have delayed it for a year out of greed and when they want to release it there will be no cinemas left, ah well....straight to britbox?
    Disney tested the water with Mulan and discovered that they can't make anywhere near enough money charging £20 to watch at home, compared to what they make at the cinema, which is why No Time To Die, Black Widow and Dune et al will be pushed back until they can guarantee at least 75% capacity in cinemas (Tenet is struggling to make its budget back with 25-50% capacity).

    We'll probably only see indie movies get what they call a 'day and date' release (when it's on pay per view at home at the same time as cinema) but not many more blockbusters. 

    Sky Movies were trying to close the home ents window for years, but it was the big cinema chains that were holding studios back from doing more Day and Date stuff. They insist on getting 90 days exclusivity. Now that Odeon and co. can't threaten the studios, I expected to see more experiments. Mulan seems to have ended that, sadly. 
  • Options
    I was surprised at reading that but I suppose once a film is digitally 'out there' it won't take long before it ends up on a free streaming service which makes studios exactly fuck all 

    Something I did for a while with my wife was Friday night movies, I have never found a streaming service that is either not a hassle to use or has good enough quality to justify sticking with one, so we would buy a film on Amazon, relatively new release and watch that. Some are cheap the biggies tend to be around the 10 mark as buy and keep. Cheaper than going to the pictures but also fair and OK value to watch on a decent TV and soundsystem.

    I've found that as much as i live the cinema its something that makes me too angry too often to go regularly. People on phones, people talking, people eating generally people and whilst I have found no better way to watch a film than as soon as the cinema opens, mid week on my own, its impractical with having a day job. 


  • Options
    I am not to surprised really, Cinema tickets are what £15 each.

    So even if its say just an average family say, Mum, Dad and 2 kids thats what about say £40 for tickets, watch it at home for £20 and thats half the revenue gone already, add to that if you have a neighbour and there wife over to watch it as well(socially distanced of course) but thats another £30 the cinema would lose that would count towards the £20 you paid.


Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!