Kent have done far better this season than I thought they would. Surrey on the other hand have under performed. But we should both be safe to play one another next season in the top division. Happy days.
I was behind with my info. It was 17. WE gave it a go but called it a draw at 57-3 after 8.2 overs. Blake did bat in place of the concussed Kuhn. Hope he is OK. Suspect he may have to miss the weekend's 20/20.
I was behind with my info. It was 17. WE gave it a go but called it a draw at 57-3 after 8.2 overs. Blake did bat in place of the concussed Kuhn. Hope he is OK. Suspect he may have to miss the weekend's 20/20.
Comments
153 to win off of (presumably) 17 given the loss of two for the innings break.
Tough. Will they go for it?
So unlikely to force a win, but should be some good entertainment!
We will likely fall short but great to see us giving it a good go.
Blakey out for a run-a-ball 15, Kent 53-2.
100 to win off a minimum 9.3 balls.
97 required from 8.5, so a smidge over 11 an over
For the optimistic: 97 to win off 54 balls.
Or, if you're old-school, 9 overs to avoid losing 7 wickets and thus secure the draw ...
Kent 12pts, Hants 11pts.
With Notts losing and Warks in strife against Essex (along with Slurrey being crap too
Surrey on the other hand have under performed.
But we should both be safe to play one another next season in the top division.
Happy days.
https://www.kentcricket.co.uk/news/stevens-heads-out-on-loan-for-blast/