Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ICC Cricket World Cup 2019

1686971737497

Comments

  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    Chizz said:

    Cricket owes much of its appeal and enjoyment to the fact that it should be played not only according to the Laws, but also within the Spirit of Cricket.  The major responsibility for ensuring fair play rests with the captains, but extends to all players, match officials and, especially in junior cricket, teachers, coaches and parents.

    Respect is central to the Spirit of Cricket.

    Respect your captain, team-mates, opponents and the authority of the umpires.

    Play hard and play fair.

    Accept the umpire’s decision.

    Create a positive atmosphere by your own conduct, and encourage others to do likewise.

    Show self-discipline, even when things go against you.

    Congratulate the opposition on their successes, and enjoy those of your own team.

    Thank the officials and your opposition at the end of the match, whatever the result.

    Cricket is an exciting game that encourages leadership, friendship and teamwork, which brings together people from different nationalities, cultures and religions, especially when played within the Spirit of Cricket.

    We also ask that players refrain from sandpapering the ball and deliberately bowling wides.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,849
    Chizz said:
    Roy could clearly be seen saying to Finch what are you doing. 
    Finch could have retracted his appeal  as he new Roy didn't touch the ball.
    Finch is as guilty as anyone if you ask me.
    Nope. When did you last see an Australian or English captain withdraw an appeal after a player has been given out?  Say, in the last 100 years. 
    In the final if Williamson is incorrectly given out I'm sure Jason Roy will run to the umpire to reverse the decision
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,792
    I'm sorry - as much as Roy didn't hit it, his behaviour subsequently was awful
    Cheated out of a century in a world cup semi-final. 
    I fully support him
    And that behaviour is replicated every Saturday afternoon - which is why so many teams turn up without an umpire
    Crikey it wasn’t that bad ffs. 

    Really? This isn't football
    What’s that got to do with the price of fish?
    He was, quite rightly, angry & he had his say before he walked. 
    Can’t see what’s so bad about that. 
    He’ll get fined & feck all will be said about the umpire. 
    The difference is that this sort of behaviour in disputing decisions is expected with football. It isn't with cricket but has crept into the game over the last 30 years or so to the extent that grass roots cricket cannot get people who are prepared to officiate.


    But in this instance, he just questioned his decision before he walked. 
    Why would that put off people officiating at grass roots?

    You are meant to walk when you are given out. Not dispute the decision or swear at the opposition for appealing. It is this action that causes issues. Because on a Saturday, if a batsman disputes a decision, he is then told by one of the opposition fielders to "just fxxx off, you've been given out". And then the umpire doesn't just have to umpire but try to stop all hell breaking lose.


  • cafckev
    cafckev Posts: 2,914
    Just watch the umpire. He can clearly been seen hesitating in raising his finger. To me it’s clear he was unsure about the decision, but because the Aussies were so loud, it influenced him.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    Anyway ....................................

    197-2    29 overs

    England require 27 from 21 overs.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Bairstow should not be allowed to appeal again. 
    He appeals for everything when batting or keeping no matter how stupid the appeal is.
    If I was captain I would just tell him to bat and keep wicket but leave the appeals to others.
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,229
    This isn't the dog and duck 2nd 11, against the Samaritans. I would hope that England would appeal against the Aussies in a similar situation..

    Semi final of a cricket WC. Two reviews seem right to me for 50 over and test cricket. Bairstow and Roy didn't think that through but JB was great so let's not castigate the Yorkshire pudding too much.
  • i think Roy may also have been questioning the delivery as a no ball ...
  • Bairstow should not be allowed to appeal again. 
    He appeals for everything when batting or keeping no matter how stupid the appeal is.
    If I was captain I would just tell him to bat and keep wicket but leave the appeals to others.
    Absolutely.

    By all means appeal if you need 20 runs and are 8 men down. No need whatsoever to use your last appeal when you are 124/0 in the 18th over.
  • Sponsored links:



  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Bairstow should not be allowed to appeal again. 
    He appeals for everything when batting or keeping no matter how stupid the appeal is.
    If I was captain I would just tell him to bat and keep wicket but leave the appeals to others.
    Absolutely.

    By all means appeal if you need 20 runs and are 8 men down. No need whatsoever to use your last appeal when you are 124/0 in the 18th over.
    And chasing a very low score to win.
    Doesn't make sense. 
  • addick05
    addick05 Posts: 2,348
    Can just visualize the sports pages in the Aussie press tomorrow!
  • Laddick01
    Laddick01 Posts: 6,365
    Will Morgan let Root have the 50 hmmm
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,338
    addick05 said:
    Can just visualize the sports pages in the Aussie press tomorrow!
    Right now (this isn't a joke) the cricket section of the Melbourne Age is leading with: Mark Taylor and Ian Healy have suggested Jason Roy could be in trouble for dissent
  • This has to go down as one of our best ever ODI performances.

    Won't get many better all round than this. Pretty much perfect aside from Bairstow's review.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,338
    222 for 2, 2 to win.  

    RIP, Richie Benaud
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    Eng win with 107 balls spare.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Chizz said:
    addick05 said:
    Can just visualize the sports pages in the Aussie press tomorrow!
    Right now (this isn't a joke) the cricket section of the Melbourne Age is leading with: Mark Taylor and Ian Healy have suggested Jason Roy could be in trouble for dissent
    Sandpaper wankers 
  • Addick Addict
    Addick Addict Posts: 39,792
    Absolutely thrashed the Aussies.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    Chizz said:
    addick05 said:
    Can just visualize the sports pages in the Aussie press tomorrow!
    Right now (this isn't a joke) the cricket section of the Melbourne Age is leading with: Mark Taylor and Ian Healy have suggested Jason Roy could be in trouble for dissent
    We know he's in trouble.
    He'll get a fine & a disciplinary point.
  • Sponsored links:



  • addick05
    addick05 Posts: 2,348
    As opposed to the whole f******g Aussie team being in trouble. What a bunch of sore losers. Smashed them out of sight and this is the best they can come up with?
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    Absolutely thrashed the Aussies.
    A phrase I'll never tire of reading
  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    edited July 2019
    Someone tell Chizz England won,that will piss him off
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,607
    Absolutely thrilled with that. 
    Just didn’t want that Australian side winning anything, as that imo sends out a far worse message to kids playing cricket than having a word with the umpire. 
    Good luck to them in the final. 
    Brilliant. 
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,026
    Fabulous result, well done England!
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,849
    What a complete demolition job. 8 wickets, nearly EIGHTEEN overs in hand!
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,338
    The best part of that performance is the fact that a lot of the senior players stepped up to the mark.  Woakes and Archer were a far better opening attack than Berendorf and Starc; Wood thoroughly deserved his wicket; Rashid bowled even better than his figures suggest; Buttler's one key moment was utterly brilliant (to nutmeg the opponents' star player at the same time as running him out); Bairstow and (especially) Roy completely outplayed the Aussies; Root and Morgan completed the demolition with consummate ease.  It was *almost* the perfect performance.  

    One more to go...
  • Sillybilly
    Sillybilly Posts: 9,236
    edited July 2019
    Woakes given motm.  That’sjust plain politics. Roy all day long. His reaction to being given out has done for him. 
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    England v New Zealand in the final. 
    Predicted on the 6th of July.

    I thank you. 
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,229
    Chizz said:
    addick05 said:
    Can just visualize the sports pages in the Aussie press tomorrow!
    Right now (this isn't a joke) the cricket section of the Melbourne Age is leading with: Mark Taylor and Ian Healy have suggested Jason Roy could be in trouble for dissent
    Sandpaper wankers 

    Please don't try this at home  :'(