Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

1…969799101102…175

Comments

  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    Sounds to me like someone is getting really desperate
  • Red7OakRed7Oak
    If the judge reads the articles it also says the sale of the club is important because it saves us from the cretins fighting over ownership! Being a community club that should be important to him!
  • Rob7LeeRob7Lee
    Chaisty's digging a hole, judge not going to like this.
  • IdleHansIdleHans
    He's sounding like an excited Steve Claridge 
  • se9addickse9addick
    Chaisty's getting aggy. 
  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
  • WishIdStayedinthePubWishIdStayedinthePub
    Come on, m'lud, do not cave into this twat
  • Sponsored links:


  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    Judge ruling on injunction pending application to appeal. Says unusual having decided not to grant injunction for longer period. Judge believes appeal will not be successful.
  • BodBod
    It is high time these thick bastards realised that the game is up. 
  • ProperCharltonProperCharlton
    edited September 2020
    Come on. We're so close.
  • TalalTalal
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
    Has Pearce gone to the bog? 
  • CAFCsayerCAFCsayer
    BR7_addick said:
    This is crap surely, what next?

    Chasity: “As you can see judge Pearce, there’s lots of tweets saying imminent”
    Hahaha... Not only has the whole ESI saga been acted out over Twitter, they've now got their lawyer trying to quote twitter in a court of law. Gold. 
  • carly burncarly burn
    Chaisty not the first to be caught out by the 'Its happening' gif that's been posted on here a gazillion times over the years.
  • Cafc43v3rCafc43v3r
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
    Who is judge Clarke?!?! 
  • LargeAddickLargeAddick
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
    where has he popped up from?
  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    Is there another Judge there too seeing that Judge Clarke has just been mentioned, or has Cawley done a typo?
  • The Prince-e-PaulThe Prince-e-Paul
    BR7_addick said:
    This is crap surely, what next?

    Chasity: “As you can see judge Pearce, there’s lots of tweets saying imminent”
    There's lots of posts saying that we were gonna smash Millwall, but we know the actual result every time!
  • Sponsored links:


  • robinofottershawrobinofottershaw
    Everyone keep fingers crossed.
  • meldrew66meldrew66
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
    oh-oh, that kinda opens the door for Judge Pearce to grant the interim injunction then?
  • ct_addickct_addick
    Hold on but Chaisty sayin yesterday no sale imminent but flips that today. Judge ruled yesterday that CAFC an asset to the community and in peril. Surely needs to kick this out and chastise Chaisty
  • The Red RobinThe Red Robin
    LargeAddick said:
    ForeverAddickted said:
    Judge Clarke says it would be "unusual" for a court to grant an injunction for a short time when it hadn't granted it for a longer time. He says it doesn't mean the court has "no power" to grant an interim injunction while a party at least tries to go to Court of Appeal.
    where has he popped up from?

    90th minute substitution.
  • ForeverAddicktedForeverAddickted
    The judge says he doesn't think Lex Dominus appeal will be successful.
  • golfaddickgolfaddick
    BR7_addick said:
    This is crap surely, what next?

    Chasity: “As you can see judge Pearce, there’s lots of tweets saying imminent”
    Lauren wants to pull out the infamous VOTV issue then.....from 3 years ago  !!
  • Cafc43v3rCafc43v3r
    I thought Sarr was the back up for Pearce..... Not Billy Clarke. 
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!