Pearce saying he hasn't seen the material in the public domain.
Chaisty saying easy to see reports of Sandgaard being in the country to try and do a deal.
Pearce asking to be pointed to a certain website.
Judge says he hasn’t seen material in public domain re @SandgaardThomasand wonders if he should be. Chaisty suggests that he Googles it. Judge not keen.
Shit! No-one mention Charltonlife or Ali-Wibble to anyone!!
Has Nimer bought a club for £1, found some mugs to put hundreds of thousands in to fund bills, about to sell it for millions and will be basically long gone by should any future judgement say that he needs to make some sort of restitution?
i would love it if Kreamer sticks on a Charlton top to end it.
There is absolutely ZERO conflict of interest in LK representing Panorama and being a recent, former board member of CAST and current and passionate Addick. CAFC is not a party to the proceedings and to the extent that she has an emotional interest in the asset in dispute, that is completely immaterial to the claim and the defence. There are however MULTIPLE conflicts of interest for Mr Farnell who lodged this complaint and has represented both parties to these proceedings - bloody rich for PE's QC to kvetch about it.
My understanding (solicitor but not in this field). First a request for permission to appeal has to be made to Pearce - that's what they are doing today. Usually these get refused unless there is a clear point of law which the judge thinks important enough to go to the Court of Appeal .
If refused, an application for permission to appeal is made to the Court of Appeal. It is considered by a single judge on the papers. If refused, in some circumstances the appellant can ask for a short hearing about the permission. If permission is granted then the hearing goes ahead in front of three judges.
What I'm not sure about is timelines on injunctions. I have a case which my side won. The other side was refused permission from the original court but got permission from the Court of Appeal. That took about 6 weeks. The hearing won't take place for more than a year because the Court of Appeal is so backed up.
I guess they could apply for an emergency interim injunction from the CoA but I would have thought you would need a really important high profile case to get that fast tracked.
You can do a emergency interim application to the COA over the phone,
Unlike London, Manchester could take trial in November so in order to achieve a speedy trial strong argument to hold it in Manchester. Declines transfer.
Because yesterday's game was to spend 80 mins carrying out a character assassination on Mihail, which tbf, worked, opinions and influence can matter and sway decisions in court.
Comments
Along with pyrrhic and draconian from their QC.
Yeah why ignore more reliable sites...
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
This. He is asking the judge to google but TS was in the country before yesterday.
How he's using the media speculation as evidence
Judge looking at webpage from Football League World - not an original source!