I think its quite likely they will go to the Court of Appeal, I see little reason for them not to.
At worst, the sale goes through before they get the chance and their position remains the same in having to look for damages. At best, it gives a chance at injunction.
Does mean higher legal fees, that's the only big question mark considering they haven't yet paid the £1 Lex Dominus spent on the club.
I think its quite likely they will go to the Court of Appeal, I see little reason for them not to.
At worst, the sale goes through before they get the chance and their position remains the same in having to look for damages. At best, it gives a chance at injunction.
Does mean higher legal fees, that's the only big question mark considering they haven't yet paid the £1 Lex Dominus spent on the club.
Just hope that the Judge doesnt let them have a seven day injunction!!
Has Nimer bought a club for £1, found some mugs to put hundreds of thousands in to fund bills, about to sell it for millions and will be basically long gone by should any future judgement say that he needs to make some sort of restitution?
Has Nimer bought a club for £1, found some mugs to put hundreds of thousands in to finer bills, about to sell it for millions and will be basically long gone by should any future judgement say that he needs to make some sort of restitution?
i would love it if Kreamer sticks on a Charlton top to end it.
There is absolutely ZERO conflict of interest in LK representing Panorama and being a recent, former board member of CAST and current and passionate Addick. CAFC is not a party to the proceedings and to the extent that she has an emotional interest in the asset in dispute, that is completely immaterial to the claim and the defence. However, LK noted in yesterday's proceedings that there appears to be a clear conflict of interest for Mr Farnell, who lodged this complaint and has represented both parties to these proceedings. All in all, bloody rich for PE's QC to kvetch about LK.
If it goes to the Court of Appeal then Chaisty gets a few more days of billable work - an understandable motivation that I'm sure he'd deny. Meanwhile PE racks up more legal costs that he has little chance of recovering. Indeed if he persists in using Chaisty and Panorama Magic continue to have access to Lauren's time PE has every chance of forking the bill for his own and Panorama's legal costs.
How long before we see Lex Dominus chasing IPS Law for compensation?
Has Nimer bought a club for £1, found some mugs to put hundreds of thousands in to finer bills, about to sell it for millions and will be basically long gone by should any future judgement say that he needs to make some sort of restitution?
The guy is teflon. Buys a club for a quid. Gets someone else to pay the wages and then walks away with 2 mil.
A big weakness in the argument for a 7 day freeze, is that in arguments yesterday, Chaisty argued there was no evidence of an imminent sale. What benefit exists therefore for a temporary freeze if nothing is imminent?
A big weakness in the argument for a 7 day freeze, is that in arguments yesterday, Chaisty argued there was no evidence of an imminent sale. What benefit exists therefore for a temporary freeze if nothing is imminent?
Yeah should be turned down seeing that Chaisty went with the argument yesterday that a takeover wasnt imminent
i would love it if Kreamer sticks on a Charlton top to end it.
There is absolutely ZERO conflict of interest in LK representing Panorama and being a recent, former board member of CAST and current and passionate Addick. CAFC is not a party to the proceedings and to the extent that she has an emotional interest in the asset in dispute, that is completely immaterial to the claim and the defence. There are however MULTIPLE conflicts of interest for Mr Farnell who lodged this complaint and has represented both parties to these proceedings - bloody rich for PE's QC to kvetch about it.
100% agree with that view. Makes you wonder why LK stepped down from CAST if (legally) there cannot be a conflict of interest. Maybe she was just being ultra cautious ("whiter than white")
So he's now brought up Thomas Sandgaard as an imminent owner, but why should a judge overturn his own decision (that he has made twice) to allow Elliott to go over his head to the court of appeal
Pearce saying he hasn't seen the material in the public domain.
Chaisty saying easy to see reports of Sandgaard being in the country to try and do a deal.
Pearce asking to be pointed to a certain website.
Judge says he hasn’t seen material in public domain re @SandgaardThomasand wonders if he should be. Chaisty suggests that he Googles it. Judge not keen.
Comments
At worst, the sale goes through before they get the chance and their position remains the same in having to look for damages. At best, it gives a chance at injunction.
Does mean higher legal fees, that's the only big question mark considering they haven't yet paid the £1 Lex Dominus spent on the club.
But I'm loving him.
CAFC is not a party to the proceedings and to the extent that she has an emotional interest in the asset in dispute, that is completely immaterial to the claim and the defence.
However, LK noted in yesterday's proceedings that there appears to be a clear conflict of interest for Mr Farnell, who lodged this complaint and has represented both parties to these proceedings.
All in all, bloody rich for PE's QC to kvetch about LK.
How long before we see Lex Dominus chasing IPS Law for compensation?
3 June 2020 - interim injunction refused
18 June 2020 - hearing before court of appeal (unclear when permission was granted). Appeal failed
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/793.html
If Thomas does get his skates on and gets the deal through this week, we should be OK whatever
Judge says he hasn’t seen material in public domain re @SandgaardThomas and wonders if he should be. Chaisty suggests that he Googles it. Judge not keen.