Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
From what was said on here earlier I believe they can do bothChunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?0 -
Surely if TS buys us for £1 that is the size of the pot.
Personally I don't want Southall getting anything. If he had not try to do his con we would never have heard of Farnell and Paul Elliott would be an ex players name not a con mans.1 -
Chaisty couldn't do October as he's got a difficult fraud case to prosecute then.
However, he's shitting himself over the defence's barrister, who pulls no punches.
22 -
perhaps this should have been members only then .....IdleHans said:
You are not supposed to report on a case while it is in progress. Judge was clear on that in his opening remarks.Bedsaddick said:
Why would that be breaking the law ?fat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?0 -
Compo would be the price that TS buys ESI from Nimer for i would have thought.CL_Phantom said:From my limited understanding...
This case has always been and still is Elliotts shell co. V Nimers shell co.
The club can still be sold, the decision yesterday still stands, nothing happening today in regards to the appeal will overturn that.
The "prosecution" have in their opening statement admited that it's likely a sale will go ahead and be completed before the trial date in November.
At this point it's making sure that Elliots co. Have a claim in should the courts at the appeal trial decode that yes, their sale agreement was breached. The outcome of that I imagine would be...
Elliott's legal fees paidCompensation to at least the sum of what "he" "put in" probably a bit more on top. This would be billed to Panaroma magic (Nimer)0 -
Court of appeal.ForeverAddickted said:
How can they do this?Chunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?2 -
Directly to The Court of AppealForeverAddickted said:
How can they do this?Chunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?1 -
We're into some dull date stuff now. It's at this stage that I think about making a cup of tea.
2 -
Cafc43v3r said:
Court of appeal.ForeverAddickted said:
How can they do this?Chunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?
Cheers... If anything else is good coming from this its learning more about how the Courts themselves workShootersHillGuru said:
Directly to The Court of AppealForeverAddickted said:
How can they do this?Chunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?0 -
How long does that take?ShootersHillGuru said:
Directly to The Court of AppealForeverAddickted said:
How can they do this?Chunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?0 - Sponsored links:
-
The appeal will have no consequences for Thomas Sandgaard if he is owner before then. It will simply be a case of ESI2 fighting for some of the lucre ESI1 have grabbed from the sale. Nimer can run away but Matt Southall can't. There is now a strong incentive for Nimer selling the club for a relatively small fee as that might persuade ESI2 to drop their interest given the costs involved and lack of certainty that those could be awarded as well.1
-
Then the club will still be under a temporary injunction until the appeal is heard, no?Leeds_Addick said:
From what was said on here earlier I believe they can do bothChunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?1 -
but that will take weeks and won't stop a sale going aheadCafc43v3r said:
Court of appeal.ForeverAddickted said:
How can they do this?Chunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?1 -
Blimey it’s all so complicated - you clearly need some brains to work in the law
Makes me wonder how Farnell ever got to where he is !!!6 -
Can't help but like this judge.
A human being - totally unlike the pompous farts we hear about so often.9 -
Chunes said:
Then the club will still be under a temporary injunction until the appeal is heard, no?Leeds_Addick said:
From what was said on here earlier I believe they can do bothChunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?
no0 -
noChunes said:
Then the club will still be under a temporary injunction until the appeal is heard, no?Leeds_Addick said:
From what was said on here earlier I believe they can do bothChunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?0 -
Chaisty's surely wondering through all this when he will be paid having heard yesterday his client couldn't pay a £16
-
The law is solid in this area as it effectively underlines the intention of each party.0
-
Or take £650k - which means Southall has £350k and leave him to face the musicCardinal Sin said:The appeal will have no consequences for Thomas Sandgaard if he is owner before then. It will simply be a case of ESI2 fighting for some of the lucre ESI1 have grabbed from the sale. Nimer can run away but Matt Southall can't. There is now a strong incentive for Nimer selling the club for a relatively small fee as that might persuade ESI2 to drop their interest given the costs involved and lack of certainty that those could be awarded as well.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
That's what I thought as well but according to most on here it doesn't seem like itChunes said:
Then the club will still be under a temporary injunction until the appeal is heard, no?Leeds_Addick said:
From what was said on here earlier I believe they can do bothChunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?0 -
Got to lodge in 14 days iirc, could take months though to be heard.MattF said:
How long does that take?ShootersHillGuru said:
Directly to The Court of AppealForeverAddickted said:
How can they do this?Chunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?1 -
ESI are getting a lot more than £1 from TS. Unbelievable but true.Richard J said:Surely if TS buys us for £1 that is the size of the pot.
Personally I don't want Southall getting anything. If he had not try to do his con we would never have heard of Farnell and Paul Elliott would be an ex players name not a con mans.
The damages could stretch further because ESI let Elliott put money in. I think Elliott has a strong case against them but I also don't care because we should be owned by TS by then
1 -
Great.LargeAddick said:
noChunes said:
Then the club will still be under a temporary injunction until the appeal is heard, no?Leeds_Addick said:
From what was said on here earlier I believe they can do bothChunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?0 -
PeanutsMolloy said:Can't help but like this judge.
A human being - totally unlike the pompous farts we hear about so often.
...and to think that, pre-hearing, we were reading complaints about his behaviour and decision-making. Like you PM, I thought he was ok when I was watching yesterday.1 -
he is paid by the Solicitors who appointed him, it wouldn't have even crossed his mind. They could have insisted on monies on account before proceeding.MattF said:Chaisty's surely wondering through all this when he will be paid having heard yesterday his client couldn't pay a £10 -
If PE has loaned/given money to the club to pay wages, I imagine TS will return it to him?Cardinal Sin said:The appeal will have no consequences for Thomas Sandgaard if he is owner before then. It will simply be a case of ESI2 fighting for some of the lucre ESI1 have grabbed from the sale. Nimer can run away but Matt Southall can't. There is now a strong incentive for Nimer selling the club for a relatively small fee as that might persuade ESI2 to drop their interest given the costs involved and lack of certainty that those could be awarded as well.1 -
No. There is no injunction. The judge can say "I will let you appeal" or "I won't let you appeal". If the latter, then it's off to the Court of Appeal to argue that the judge was wrong in law to not allow an appeal.Chunes said:
Then the club will still be under a temporary injunction until the appeal is heard, no?1 -
He's asking for an appeal..0
-
Has anyone run across the courtroom yet and dropped a roundhouse on Chaisty?2
This discussion has been closed.
