Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
if Pearce doesn't grant leave to appeal then they can appeal directly to the Court of Appeal but it will be too late to stop a sale to TS or another party. This is all about getting their 'fair' share of whatever ESI sell to TNS for.Covered End said:
They want an appeal to get yesterday's decision overturned, so they get their injunction to prevent a sale.Leeds_Addick said:If we are sold in the meantime then what would be the point of an appeal?
That's what's confusing me6 -
November 23 it is. Pearce says it might actually start on the 24th and take the rest of the week. He's now asking Chaisty for a timetable for disclosure/witness statements etc.
1 -
Can any legal eagles on here explain to how an appeal to yesterday’s ruling work / what effect it would have please ?1
-
Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?
0 -
carly burn said:This could be playing into TS hands even more so now.
ESI need to get out quick before this gets anywhere near a trial.
So unless the Turks are nearly there id say they are dead in the water. They probably don't even exist
...although one could argue that the sellers could up their price knowing that TS needs to get over the line in the next 2 months or so.0 -
Well Rich Cawley and Airman Brown are doing it?fat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?0 -
.
0 -
Move it to Westminster Hall.🪓⚖️0
-
Of course notfat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?0 -
Just a reminder that of #cafc has been sold by November, the parties will be contesting damages. The ownership of the club won’t be on the table. What we’re interested in is any appeal.
10 - Sponsored links:
-
Yep. And the right to chase Nimer (haha) and Southall (much more likely) for money they "shouldn't" have made by selling the club.LargeAddick said:
if Pearce doesn't grant leave to appeal then they can appeal directly to the Court of Appeal but it will be too late to stop a sale to TS or another party. This is all about getting their 'fair' share of whatever ESI sell to TNS for.Covered End said:
They want an appeal to get yesterday's decision overturned, so they get their injunction to prevent a sale.Leeds_Addick said:If we are sold in the meantime then what would be the point of an appeal?
That's what's confusing me3 -
Grass !!ForeverAddickted said:
Well Rich Cawley and Airman Brown are doing it?fat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?10 -
meldrew66 said:carly burn said:This could be playing into TS hands even more so now.
ESI need to get out quick before this gets anywhere near a trial.
So unless the Turks are nearly there id say they are dead in the water. They probably don't even exist
...although one could argue that the sellers could up their price knowing that TS needs to get over the line in the0 -
it will be heard too late to stop a sale, don't worry ...Lordflashheart said:Can any legal eagles on here explain to how an appeal to yesterday’s ruling work / what effect it would have please ?2 -
No because its not a criminal trial by jury. We would be if it was.fat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?0 -
Southall may be potless now but might have a couple of million from sale of CAFC before the appeal gets heard. Wouldn't it be hilarious if he's only 'rich' for five minutes! I despise the lot of them but would happily see Farnell and Elliott rewarded if it means Southall and Nimer have to pay.1
-
No I'm with Carly, Nimer will be desperate to sell and feck off before the trial. They won't hear from him again.meldrew66 said:carly burn said:This could be playing into TS hands even more so now.
ESI need to get out quick before this gets anywhere near a trial.
So unless the Turks are nearly there id say they are dead in the water. They probably don't even exist
...although one could argue that the sellers could up their price knowing that TS needs to get over the line in the next 2 months or so.0 -
Thank fuck for thatForeverAddickted said:Just a reminder that of #cafc has been sold by November, the parties will be contesting damages. The ownership of the club won’t be on the table. What we’re interested in is any appeal.3 -
or ESI stalls not knowing how much they will owe ESI v2 if they losemeldrew66 said:carly burn said:This could be playing into TS hands even more so now.
ESI need to get out quick before this gets anywhere near a trial.
So unless the Turks are nearly there id say they are dead in the water. They probably don't even exist
...although one could argue that the sellers could up their price knowing that TS needs to get over the line in the next 2 months or so.0 -
Happily? None of them deserve a penny so in a way I don't care which of them earn a few quid.Cardinal Sin said:Southall may be potless now but might have a couple of million from sale of CAFC before the appeal gets heard. Wouldn't it be hilarious if he's only 'rich' for five minutes! I despise the lot of them but would happily see Farnell and Elliott rewarded if it means Southall and Nimer have to pay.
No chance will Nimer have to pay, he'll disappear.0 - Sponsored links:
-
Why would that be breaking the law ?fat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?0 -
Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?
0 -
Or turn it around, if they haven’t sold they may lose the club for a £1.meldrew66 said:carly burn said:This could be playing into TS hands even more so now.
ESI need to get out quick before this gets anywhere near a trial.
So unless the Turks are nearly there id say they are dead in the water. They probably don't even exist
...although one could argue that the sellers could up their price knowing that TS needs to get over the line in the next 2 months or so.I think it is they that need to do a deal quickly. Time for a cheeky offer?2 -
then they'd run the risk of Elliott overturning the injuction on appeal and could end up with nothing.ct_addick said:
or ESI stalls not knowing how much they will owe ESI v2 if they losemeldrew66 said:carly burn said:This could be playing into TS hands even more so now.
ESI need to get out quick before this gets anywhere near a trial.
So unless the Turks are nearly there id say they are dead in the water. They probably don't even exist
...although one could argue that the sellers could up their price knowing that TS needs to get over the line in the next 2 months or so.1 -
You are not supposed to report on a case while it is in progress. Judge was clear on that in his opening remarks.Bedsaddick said:
Why would that be breaking the law ?fat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?1 -
From my limited understanding...
This case has always been and still is Elliotts shell co. V Nimers shell co.
The club can still be sold, the decision yesterday still stands, nothing happening today in regards to the appeal will overturn that.
The "prosecution" have in their opening statement admited that it's likely a sale will go ahead and be completed before the trial date in November.
At this point it's making sure that Elliots co. Have a claim in should the courts at the appeal trial decide that yes, the sale agreement was breached. The outcome of that I imagine would be...
Elliott's legal fees paidCompensation to at least the sum of what "he" "put in" probably a bit more on top. This would be billed to Panaroma magic (Nimer)12 -
How can they do this?Chunes said:Is the judge allowing an appeal, or are they pursuing an appeal in spite of the judge?0 -
That's what I was I thought I heardIdleHans said:
You are not supposed to report on a case while it is in progress. Judge was clear on that in his opening remarks.Bedsaddick said:
Why would that be breaking the law ?fat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?0 -
Discussion about cost and case management and disclosure going on. Nothing of interest to fans!
1 -
I think he said screenshotting or filming the case . Not reporting on it .IdleHans said:
You are not supposed to report on a case while it is in progress. Judge was clear on that in his opening remarks.Bedsaddick said:
Why would that be breaking the law ?fat man on a moped said:Wonder if we are breaking the law commenting on here as the hearing goes on?0
This discussion has been closed.
