Chaisty saying Panorama is a shell company and will have no interest in the case.
But he's still asking for a speedy trial in case their pessimism is misplaced or some form of relief from the court of appeal which still makes a trial effective.
This is looking a bit more interesting than I had thought.
Attacking fans for abuse (with some justification), attacking LK, wants an appeal and fast trial. Suddenly the prospect of a sale is imminent according to Chaisty following media reports. Yesterday he said that was all just gossip.
Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November.
He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
Twat made the opposite argument yesterday, saying there would be no problem in granting the injunction as the trial would happen before any likely sale
Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November.
He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
Surely this is him bringing his own evidence?
I thought LK was stopped from doing this yesterday?
I suspect it's come into the public demain over night. So is relevant to an appeal?
For a solicitor, Chaisty states an awful lot of conjuncture trying to dress it as factual. Easy to take sides in this case but I think he certainly needs a lot more substance if he were to impress me. Obvious mind games at the start in trying to scare Kreamer a little.
Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November.
He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
Nice to see the judge using last nights news to effectively back up his decision not to award the injunction
This is looking a bit more interesting than I had thought.
Attacking fans for abuse (with some justification), attacking LK, wants an appeal and fast trial. Suddenly the prospect of a sale is imminent according to Chaisty following media reports. Yesterday he said that was all just gossip.
1. I don't understand how he's able to bring new evidence into this.
There is no issue in being a fan of a football club and also representing it - she stepped down from CAST to sever any link whilst she acted on the case - end of
Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November.
He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
Surely this is him bringing his own evidence?
I thought LK was stopped from doing this yesterday?
I suspect it's come into the public demain over night. So is relevant to an appeal?
LK was bringing stuff up that was in the public doman yesterday and Chaisty made a fuss about it and she had to stop
Just re-posting from the other thread. @Rob7Lee has said that "John Burke" was added, early on to the list of attendees, presumably by Elliott's crew. Did anyone else notice this? If so, did they see the person on screen? We are very anxious to ID him.
Didn't see his face but if Tom from Eltham is reading I'd happily go to Court to say it was him who turned on his mic and shouted "That's because you're a c*** Farnell".
The judge isn't an idiot. The imminent sale isn't going to effect things, purely on the basis it was the main reason the injunction wasn't granted yesterday.
There is no issue in being a fan of a football club and also representing it - she stepped down from CAST to sever any link whilst she acted on the case - end of
Chaisty said in light of press releases last night there is no likelihood of a sale not taking place before November.
He says the trial in November will be a "non-event" - the shares will be sold and Panorama will have "disappeared into the ether'.
Surely this is him bringing his own evidence?
I thought LK was stopped from doing this yesterday?
I suspect it's come into the public demain over night. So is relevant to an appeal?
LK was bringing stuff up that was in the public doman yesterday and Chaisty made a fuss about it and she had to stop
You would argue that that could have been submitted as part of the evidence, but as it wasn't tough.
You can't include something that had not happened yet as evidence. But it could influence an appeal.
So yesterday Chaisty wants an injunction cause there's no evidence of an imminent sale, judge says no because it might put off any potential sale, now Chaisty says there is evidence of imminent sale so we want the appeal, this law stuff is bonkers
Kreamer wants trial transferred to London. Says suggestion it doesn’t matter as hearing is remote not an adequate reason for case to commence in Manchester. Respondent in London so proceedings should have been issued there. Should be transferred.
Kreamer applying for transfer of the case to the High Court in London.
Kreamer wants trial transferred to London. Says suggestion it doesn’t matter as hearing is remote not an adequate reason for case to commence in Manchester. Respondent in London so proceedings should have been issued there. Should be transferred.
Kreamer applying for transfer of the case to the High Court in London.
Comments
Attacking fans for abuse (with some justification), attacking LK, wants an appeal and fast trial. Suddenly the prospect of a sale is imminent according to Chaisty following media reports. Yesterday he said that was all just gossip.
Was he not busy for several weeks!
2. This was the reason the injunction was refused
Kreamer wants "speedy resolution" but takes exception to Chaisty saying about Panorama disappearing. Doesn't want that factored into judge's thinking.
In the meantime Charlton can be sold as there is no injunction
You can't include something that had not happened yet as evidence. But it could influence an appeal.
Kreamer applying for transfer of the case to the High Court in London.
joke